Notice Bass at start won BIG and Raman lost big? Notice how Bass isn't getting votes now and Raman is after election night? Why? Because the cheat is to put Raman over Pratt in LA Mayor race. It is impossible Bass isn't getting more. SEE IT NOW? FRAUD

Sport drink by sport drink shoutout @sportdrink

US-IRAN DEAFENING FIREFIGHT WHERE F-15 PILOT SHELTERS — REPORTS

This is Going On in ALL 50 States and the Territory of Puerto Rico…

RT @TonySeruga: 🚨 BREAKING: The FBI now believes the mass shooting at a bar in Austin, Texas, that killed three and injured 14 was an “act…

This is not a war against Iran. It is a fight for Iran’s freedom. We are supporting this military action against ayatollah's regime. #ThankYouTrump

Truflation's US CPI just cratered from 1.24% to 0.86% in a single reading. That's their lowest inflation print since 2020. Meanwhile, markets are still pricing in "higher for longer" and the Fed is holding rates at restrictive levels. Something doesn't add up. The official CPI narrative says inflation is sticky around 2.5-3%. Independent real-time data says we're already below 1%. That's roughly a 3x divergence between what the government reports and what prices are actually doing on the ground. Here's what's driving the collapse: - Utilities down 0.13%. - Clothing down 0.08%. - Housing down 0.05%. - Transport down 0.05%. - Food down 0.04%. These aren't cherry-picked categories. These are the core components of everyday spending, all moving in the same direction. When real-time inflation data diverges this sharply from official prints, one of two things happens. Either the official data catches up with a lag. Or policy stays too tight for too long and something breaks. The last time @Truflation showed readings this low was late 2020. What followed was one of the most aggressive risk-on rallies in recent memory. Current Fed policy assumes inflation is still a problem worth fighting. This Truflation data says the war might already be over. If this reading holds or drops further, the pressure for rate cuts becomes impossible to ignore. Risk assets at current levels are pricing in a Fed that stays restrictive. The independent data is screaming that the Fed is already behind the curve, just in the opposite direction everyone expected.

Had Enough? zerohedge.com/political/had-…

We should replace the word Democrat with Anti-American. It's simpler.

🚨IMPORTANT🚨 If you have a gas fireplace with an electric wall switch igniter, take the cover off and put fresh batteries in the backup igniter. If/when you lose power, the switch will activate the battery igniter and you can use your fireplace for heat. @weatherchannel FERN

#WinterStormFern, #StormPrep, #PowerOutageTips,

WOW 🚨 Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison says his Minneapolis ICE rioters CAN storm churches during service "None of us are immune from the voice of the public” Democrats will let rioters invade churches to protect their illegal voters

He automatically won the game

Number of military personnel European countries are sending to Greenland Per Reuters/Bloomberg 🇩🇪 Germany: 13 🇳🇴 Norway: 2 🇬🇧 UK: 1

#IranProtests Rebels in #Iran are burning down Mosques, in addition to govt installations; 26 Mosques have been burnt down over two days. This is a proof that the protests are orchestrated by non-Muslims (#Zionist influence). In fact, according to Jerusalem Post, the protests are spurred by #Mossad.

Larry and Sergey can’t stay in California since the wealth tax as written would confiscate 50% of their Alphabet shares. Each own ~3% of Alphabet's stock, worth about $120 billion each at today's ~$4 trillion market cap. But because their shares have 10x voting power, the SEIU-UHW California billionaire tax would treat them as owning 30% of Alphabet (3% × 10 = 30%). That means each founder's taxable wealth would be $1.2 trillion. A 5% wealth tax on $1.2 trillion = $60 billion tax bill, each. That's 50% of their actual Alphabet holdings—wiped out by a "5%" tax. Section 50303(c)(3)(C) of the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act states: "For any interests that confer voting or other direct control rights, the percentage of the business entity owned by the taxpayer shall be presumed to be not less than the taxpayer's percentage of the overall voting or other direct control rights." This means if a founder holds shares representing only 3% of economic interest but 30% of voting control (through Class B supervoting shares), the tax would presume their ownership stake is at least 30% for valuation purposes, not 3%. The wealth tax is poorly defined and designed to drive tech innovation out of California.

Who could have predicted this...

Trump Says He Has Made Up His Mind on His Fed Chair Pick