The Architectural Overture – The Confluence of Regional Destinies
Happymon Jacob
@HappymonJacob, to read your masterful essay in The Hindu, titled “SAARC empowers Delhi amidst global turmoil,” is to step onto an intellectual bridge that connects the physical geography of the Indian subcontinent with the grand strategies of a changing world.
At this moment, as the minilateral architectures of the Indo-Pacific—from the Quad to the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC)—face severe disruptions caused by shifting American priorities and regional conflicts, your words bring a necessary clarity.
You have looked past the fashionable trends of modern diplomacy to describe a core reality: the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), despite its long pause, remains an essential, sovereign instrument for India to manage its immediate neighborhood and protect its strategic space.
Your essay opens by identifying a significant structural paradox.
For the past twelve years, New Delhi chose to set aside SAARC, focusing its diplomatic energy on newer, minilateral groupings that promised global status and a simpler path forward without regional friction.
Yet, as you ruthlessly document, the international environment of 2026 has completely changed.
The minilateral forums that India embraced are now under great strain.
The Quad has not held a leaders' summit since 2024, impacted by the transactional approach of U.S. President Donald Trump and his recent diplomatic moves toward Beijing.
Simultaneously, the IMEC stands stalled due to the ongoing conflicts in West Asia, and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) remains complicated by external sanctions.
In this chaotic global landscape, SAARC offers India what no other forum can: a regional framework that requires no external guarantees, operates entirely within our immediate geographic space, and allows New Delhi to help set the terms of regional engagement as and when it is revived.
This opening provides a direct challenge to the dominant, Western-centric liberal institutionalist models that have guided international policy for decades.
For generations, global theorists argued that regional cooperation could only succeed if it was integrated into open global markets and supported by a single global superpower.
Your analysis completely alters this view.
By showing how global shifts can disrupt far-reaching minilateral networks, you present an alternate model of regional organization.
Real stability does not come from distant, complex alliances; it is built through the steady, patient work of neighborhood management.
This realist perspective forms the core theme of your extensive body of work, including your widely acclaimed books like Line on Fire: Ceasefire Violations and India-Pakistan Escalation Dynamics and your strategic columns for the Council on Strategic and Defense Research (CSDR).
In those foundational texts, you argued that India’s global ambitions are permanently tied to its capacity to maintain peace and stability in its immediate neighborhood.
Today, you apply that exact strategic framework to the crisis facing modern minilateralism, proving that if India wishes to protect its sovereign future, it must return to the foundational geography of South Asia and lead the revival of SAARC.