Accelerating Drug Discovery with HyperLab: An Easy-to-Use AI-Driven Platform
1 HyperLab (by HITS) is presented as a web-based, AI-driven SBDD platform aimed at making structure-based workflows usable by experimental drug discovery researchers without requiring AI/CADD expertise, emphasizing integrated UI/UX over fragmented toolchains.
2 The platform compresses early discovery into a single environment spanning: protein–ligand pose affinity prediction (Hyper Binding), covalent complex modeling (Covalent Hyper Binding), virtual screening from 1M to 11T compounds (Hyper Screening / Hyper Screening X), structure-based molecular optimization (Hyper Design), SAR analysis, and 19-endpoint ADME/T prediction (Hyper ADME/T), with an embedded AI assistant for workflow automation.
3 Hyper Binding’s key technical angle is physics-informed deep learning for protein–ligand interactions, supporting multiple protein inputs (PDB ID, uploaded PDB, AlphaFold structures via UniProt) and an end-to-end co-folding mode that predicts complex structures directly from protein sequence plus ligand, reducing dependence on curated receptor structures.
4 On PoseBuster v2 (PB-valid) pose prediction, Hyper Binding reports 77% accuracy when given binding-site information, compared with 58% for Vina and 13% for DiffDock; it approaches AlphaFold3 (84%) and is comparable to Boltz2 (78). The paper also highlights throughput: ~3 minutes per complex (via cloud) vs ~15 minutes for AlphaFold3 on an RTX 3060.
5 For binding affinity prediction on two FEP-style benchmarks (focused on subtle potency differences among close analogs), Hyper Binding reports Pearson r = 0.70 and 0.53, outperforming evaluated deep learning scorers (Luminet, GenScore) and physics-based docking (Glide SP, Vina) on both datasets.
6 Covalent drug discovery is treated as a first-class workflow: covalent pose prediction is benchmarked on a curated covalent set (from PDBBind/PDB). Covalent Hyper Binding (cofolding) reports 88.7% pose accuracy vs 48.4% (COV SMINA) and 46.8% (GNINA); the docking mode reports 61.3%. Screening enrichment (EF@10%) is reported as 6.56 (Mpro) and 9.97 (KRAS), exceeding baselines under the described setup.
7 Hyper Screening targets rapid hit finding by running Hyper Binding across curated libraries and returning top-ranked candidates (top 500). Built-in libraries include: Diverse (1,000,000), Fragment (500,000; rule-of-three-like), Kinase-focused (65,000), Natural product-like fragments (4,200), and FDA-approved (1,100), plus support for user-registered libraries.
8 Hyper Screening X expands to an 11-trillion-molecule virtual space using generative exploration with GFlowNet-based models, optimizing binding score plus properties (e.g., MW, TPSA, LogP). The workflow is described as: set target property constraints, train (~48h), then generate molecules (e.g., 100 molecules in ~30 min), with synthetic route output and optional synthesis request via a partner service.
9 Hyper Design provides structure-based optimization starting from a scaffold or an X-ray-bound ligand, enabling user-specified modification sites and fragment growth/replacement with synthesizability constraints; outputs include 3D structures and iterative “design trees.” The paper positions use cases as fragment-to-lead growth and generating patent-distinct analogs while preserving key interactions.
10 The internal validation study emphasizes “no post-analysis/visual inspection” selection: a 24-hour Hyper Screening run led to 52 compounds tested, yielding 5 hits with IC50 70–600 nM (~9% hit rate). Hyper Design then produced derivatives; 5 were synthesized and 3 showed >75% inhibition at 1 µM with IC50 200–400 nM, including one compound comparable or better than a reference and with supporting pathway assay readouts.
📜Paper:
biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
#DrugDiscovery #ComputationalBiology #Cheminformatics #StructureBasedDrugDesign #VirtualScreening #CovalentInhibitors #ADMET #GenerativeAI #ProteinLigandDocking #BioRxiv