♡(6/13) Da?n AI . Don't get addicted to AI ! Don't make AI your lover！ Don't use AI, think and write for your @kbozon note.com/ykbozon/n/nc358c31e… ♡(6/13) Da?n AI . Don't get addicted to AI ! Don't make AI your lover！ Don't use AI, think and write for yourself !! Don't be fooled by AI !! Ｗe request the disclosure of the search formula that appears to have been created by a patent office examiner!! The plaintiff's claim was dismissed (Plaintiff = Mitsubishi Chemical and others' rights invalid). This isthe 313th case to be declared "invalid" by the Intellectual Property High Court. drive.google.com/file/d/19FK… docs.google.com/spreadsheets… The patent holder, Mitsubishi Chemical (and others), was defeated in an invalidation trial (Invalid 2011-800165) by Riken Vitamin Co., Ltd., which is believed to be an interested party, at the Japan Patent Office's trial division. Riken Vitamin Co., Ltd., the plaintiff, presented various prior art documents as evidence A, among which the examiner recognized "A4 Invention" (JP Patent Publication No. 10-165152) as a strong prior art document. The examiner then invalidated the patents of Mitsubishi Chemical and others. The patent holders, Mitsubishi Chemical (and others), were dissatisfied with this decision and filed a lawsuit with the Intellectual Property High Court, but as mentioned above, they lost, and the patent rights were invalidated. The Intellectual Property High Court's decision largely followed the decisions of the Japan Patent Office's invalidation examiners. The problem in this case is the investigative ability of the examiners and examiners at the Japan Patent Office's examination and appeal stages. At both of the above stages, "A4 Invention" (JP Patent Publication No. 10-165152) could not be found. The examiner of the Japan Patent Office (Naoyoshi Takiguchi) was not satisfied with the patent documents provided by the searcher (KY23) of the registered search organization (General Incorporated Foundation Industrial Property Cooperation Center IPCC), so he created his own search formula to search for further prior art and presented it to the applicant. However, the nine patent documents presented to the applicant did not include the above-mentioned {A4 Invention (JP Patent Publication 10-165152). In the trial appeal, the examiners also issued a "Notice of Reasons for Refusal," but without any citations, and simply stated that "the description of the claims is incomplete, and therefore violates the provisions of Article 36, Paragraph 6, Item 1 of the Patent Act." Here again, the weak research capabilities of the Japan Patent Office, especially the examiners, are proven. It is not acceptable for the Japan Patent Office to grant a patent to an applicant based on a sloppy (search) at the examination and trial stages. Therefore, I believe that the Japan Patent Office should not have granted a patent to the applications of Mitsubishi Chemical and others. Here, I have listed the "FI" and "F-term" from the "Application Information" of this patent publication (2008-109926) on the second sheet and beyond of this Excel document. In this case, there seems to be a problem with the classification assignment. In other words, there is only one classification each ("FI" and "F-term") assigned to this patent publication (2008-109926), which is far too few. This may be affecting the examiner's review (search). In addition, we attach materials such as "Selection of search terms and classifications (FI, F-terms) and creation of search logical formulas," "Specific examples," "Searches using insufficient and irrelevant "logical search formulas" conducted by searchers at a registered research organization," and "Patent documents that searchers at a registered research organization (AIRI Co., Ltd.) were unable to find." drive.google.com/file/d/1T5b… docs.google.com/spreadsheets… （日本語原文） ♡(6/13)。くた・れAI 。AI依存症になるな ! AIを恋人にするな ！　AIを使うな、自分で考えて文章を書け ! ! 特許庁の審査官が作成したと思われる【検索論理式】の開示を、求めます！！ 原告の請求棄却、（原告=三菱ケミカル 他の権利無効）。 知的財産高等裁判所により「権利無効」とされた３１３件目のものです。 drive.google.com/file/d/19FK… docs.google.com/spreadsheets… 特許権者である三菱ケミカル（他）は、利害関係者と思われる理研ビタミン株式会社に無効審判（無効2011-800165）を起こされて、特許庁の審判部において敗北しました。 審判請求人の理研ビタミン株式会社は、種々の先行技術文献を甲号証として提示していますが、その中でも「甲４発明」（特開平１０ー１６５１５２）が強力な先行技術文献と審判官に認められました。 そして、審判官は三菱ケミカル他の特許を無効としました。 特許権者である三菱ケミカル（他）は、これを不服として、知的財産高等裁判所へ提訴しましたが、上記の通り敗北し、特許権は無効となりました。 知的財産高等裁判所の判断は、特許庁の無効審判官らの判断をほぼ踏襲しています。 本件の問題点は、特許庁の審査および不服審判の段階での審査官および審判官の調査能力です。 上記の両段階においても、「甲４発明」（特開平１０ー１６５１５２）を見つけることができていません。 特許庁の審査官（滝口尚良）は、登録調査機関（一般財団法人工業所有権協力センターIPCC）の検索者（KY23）から上がってきた特許文献に飽き足らず、自ら【検索論理式】を作成し、更なる先行技術文献を探し求めて、出願人へ提示しています。 しかしながら、出願人に提示した９件の特許文献の中には、上記の｛甲４発明」（特開平１０ー１６５１５２）は含まれていません。 また、不服審判においても、審判官らは「拒絶理由通知書」を発しましたが、引例は無く、「特許請求の範囲の記載が不備のため、特許法第３６条第６項第１号の規定に違反する。」としただけです。 ここでも、特許庁の特に審査官の調査能力が弱いことが証明されています。 特許庁の審査及び審判段階におけるいい加減な（サーチ）に基づいた、出願人への特許付与は許されません。 従って、本来なら、三菱ケミカル他の出願に対して、特許庁は特許を与えるべきでなかった、と考えます。 ここで、本件特許公開（2008-109926）の「出願情報」のうち「ＦＩ」と「Ｆターム」を、本エクセル資料の２シート目以降に挙げておきました。 本件ではこの分類付与にも問題点があるように思われます。 即ち、本件特許公開（2008-109926）への付与分類（「ＦＩ」と「Ｆターム」）が各１個ずつで、余りにも少なすぎます。 このことが審査官の審査（サーチ）に影響を及ぼしているとも考えられます。 ここで、「検索用語・分類（ＦＩ、Ｆターム）の選定 と 検索論理式の作成」、「その具体例」、「登録調査機関の検索者が行った、不十分で、的外れな「論理検索式」による（サーチ）」、「登録調査機関（株式会社ＡＩＲＩ）の検索者が見つけることのできなかった特許文献」などの資料を添付します。 drive.google.com/file/d/1Q3h… docs.google.com/spreadsheets… (Hashtags) #INPIT #JPlatPat ＃note ＃OpenAI ＃Claude #JPO #USPTO #EPO ＃Patent #ChatGPT #GPT-5 #GPT #Gemini #Threads #bing #bingAI #AI #DX #IT #DeepSeek #Copilot #BigTech #manus #Manus #ITEngineer #IPLandscape #Generative #DeepLearning #Work #Business #BusinessSkills #BusinessModel #IntellectualProperty #IntellectualPropertyRights #IntellectualPropertyHighCourt #PatentResearch #PatentLaw #PatentOffice #PatentClassification #PatentSearch #ClaudeCode

At Relecura, our AI-driven tools streamline the innovation lifecycle. Check out our AI Classifier—it categorizes vast patent datasets with high accuracy and no coding needed. Sign up for a demo! relecura.ai//products/ #ai #innovation #patentclassification #classifier #relecura

#PatentClassification is a system for classification and search of #patent documents in accordance with the field of technology they relate to. #l2pro #L2ProIndia #patents #PatentLawyer #patentlaw #patentact #textsearch #keywordsearch

#PatentClassification is a system for classification and search of #patentdocuments in accordance with the field of technology they relate to. To understand more about patents, download the L2PRO e-learning IP training program at bit.ly/3iKYgdA #l2pro #startups

Witness the power of data-driven decisions with PatSeer's patenting trends chart: bit.ly/3Hp4YAU #johnsonandjohnson #patentfiling #innovation #patseer #patentanalytics #patentsearch #patents #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification

Explore patent classification systems to navigate the maze of innovation with ease. Ready to elevate your #patent strategy? Transform your IP journey: bit.ly/3JMd5cV #innovation #patseer #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification

PatSeer's latest AI-driven feature is a game-changer in patent search. Uncover the future of innovation today. Give it a try now! bit.ly/3pU2zqs #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #ai #patentclassification #patentsearch

#PatentClassification is a system for classification and search of patent documents in accordance with the field of technology they relate to. To understand more about #patents, download the #L2PRO e-learning IP training program at bit.ly/3iKYgdA #Classification

Get insights! See what others are saying: bit.ly/3PYL6Yz #review #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentsearch #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification

Fast-track accurate patent categorization with PatSeer’s AI Classifier. Try PatSeer for free today: bit.ly/3r50Jnk #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification #patentsearch

Discover user experiences! Read reviews now: bit.ly/3PYL6Yz #review #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification #patentsearch

Read what our clients have to say about us. Don't miss your chance to try the ultimate patent platform: bit.ly/3PYL6Yz #review #industry #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification #technology

Optimize your patent strategy with PatSeer's dynamic charts and filters: bit.ly/3Hp4YAU #samsung #industry #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification #technology #infographic #electronics

Discover insights on the technologies that are shaping tomorrow. Download our free infographic to know more: bit.ly/3BFzZja #drones #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification #technology #infographic

_________ had the highest number of approved U.S. patents in 2022 #poll #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification #ibm #samsung #canon #lgelectronics #technology #tech

Unlock insights on technologies that are shaping the future. Don't miss out on our latest infographics: bit.ly/3BFzZja #drone #uav #innovation #patseer #patents #patentanalytics #patentlandscape #patentportfolio #patentclassification #infographic

Automatic Text Categorization in the International Patent Classification [IPC] lnkd.in/f7Wc_bN #patent #classification #ipc #international #patentclassification #artificialintelligence #ai #automatic #text #categorization #search #wipo #patents #upliftip #intepatip

Automatic Classification: There is likely a data deficiency challenge ahead – we need human investment! One of the take-aways from Alexander Klenner-Bajaja's insights into #AI & #patentclassification #EPOPIC