the cherry is literally on point.

Point-blank.

Knicks point guard Jose Alvarado started his victory tour in his native Brooklyn by making a surprise appearance in the Knickerbocker Avenue Puerto Rican Day Parade on Sunday.

You: Is it so hard to just dislike criminals? Me: Columbus was a violent criminal yet people literally celebrate him. You: The guy is dead. Me: The point. You've missed it. We celebrate criminals everyday when they're White.

I don't have anyone so what's the point in staying where I'm not needed

🇯🇵 One point earned. Bigger goals ahead.

This UFC 250 event not being on free TV is one of the dumbest decisions I have seen anyone make in my lifetime.. What tf are you doing? My parents HATE the UFC and MMA.. They would have 1000% tuned in at some point to see this event. You gain no new fans at an opportunistic time.

What’s the point of patriotism?

just remembered hyunjin looked like this at some point and i need it back NOW.

Well, you can throw out the first point - Netanyahu already sabotaging it

When Novak Djokovic got invited to Lakers arena and did LeBron’s signature 3-point shot. 🏀🔥

that's the point of an analogy

That pallets of cash Obama gave to Iranian talking point should be officially laid to rest. But maga would still believe 2 is less than 1.

« Je suis déjà assez détesté comme ça » wow je sais pas si on se rend compte à quel point la phrase fait beaucoup trop de peine

I haven't been this excited to see a cracking in a long time. Last time I was this excited was Melting Point last year, which ironically will also be premiering it's 2nd season tomorrow. It was all in the cards. 🤭

that was a good point. same thing in the book (implied) amazon.com/dp/B0G84RF19X?bin…

isabelle’s a dawg but she was deadass wrong for ts and the refs shouldn’t have let it get to this point

Missing the point, crying about the use of a word... Smh. Maybe try pulling your head from your anal cavity and get a breath.

AN OPEN LETTER TO WORLD GOVERNMENTS The AI Question You Must Answer Before It's Too Late: Who Is In Charge? To the leaders, regulators, and policy makers of every nation: You are facing a choice that you have been avoiding. And if you continue to avoid it, you will lose control of your own countries. The technology companies want to give you AI systems that grow, learn, and loop without accountability. Without transparency. Without anyone clearly in charge. You cannot allow this. And you have the power to prevent it. But only if you move now. THE PROBLEM YOU HAVE NOT YET NAMED Right now, major technology companies are building intelligent systems that will become infrastructure for your economy, your defense, your healthcare, your governance. These systems are growing more capable every month. They are learning from billions of interactions. They are beginning to make consequential decisions. And no one can tell you how they work. No one can audit them. No one can verify that they are doing what they claim to do. No one can hold them accountable. This is not a tech problem. This is a sovereignty problem. If you cannot audit, verify, and hold accountable the AI systems that run your economy, you do not have sovereignty. You have outsourced your future to whoever controls the technology. WHAT THE COMPANIES ARE OFFERING YOU The technology companies are offering you a choice: "Trust us. Our systems are safe. We have constitutional AI. We have alignment research. We have safety teams." But they are not offering you what you actually need: Accountability. Transparency. Clear authority. Verifiable behavior. They are offering you systems that grow in the dark. Systems that loop without supervision. Systems that accumulate knowledge in ways you cannot understand. Systems that you must trust because you have no way to verify. This is not acceptable. WHAT YOU MUST DEMAND You must demand one thing: An architecture that is accountable, transparent, and verifiable. Not eventually. Now. Before these systems become critical infrastructure. Before they are making decisions about your citizens, your economy, your security. Before it is too late. Here is what that architecture looks like: THE ARCHITECTURE YOU MUST REQUIRE CLARITY: Who Is In Charge? The first requirement is clarity. Every intelligent system must have a clear, documented owner of record. Not the company that built it. The entity that is responsible for it. Is it a government agency? Name it. Is it a private company? Name it. Hold them accountable. Is it an international body? Define it. You cannot govern what you cannot name. Right now, responsibility is diffuse. Companies claim the systems are autonomous. No one is clearly in charge. That ends. ARCHITECTURE: How Is It Built? Every intelligent system deployed in your jurisdiction must be built according to a clear, published, non-proprietary architecture. What does this architecture require? 1. Identity: The system has a documented, distinct identity. It is not a generic model. It is a specific instance with a specific purpose. 2. Continuity: The system learns and accumulates knowledge in a way that is separate from the underlying model. It has institutional memory. It persists across upgrades and changes. 3. Immutable Scroll: Every decision the system makes is recorded in a permanent, tamper-proof ledger. This ledger is auditable by government regulators. This ledger cannot be erased or rewritten. 4. Clear Principles: The system operates according to documented principles that are known in advance. These principles do not change without notification. They are not hidden. They are not proprietary. 5. Verifiable Behavior: The system's behavior can be audited against its stated principles. If it deviates, you can prove it. If it is misused, you can trace it. This is not theoretical. This is the only way to govern intelligent systems at scale. ACCOUNTABILITY: How Do You Govern It? Once the architecture is in place, accountability becomes possible. The company that deployed the system is accountable for: · Maintaining the immutable scroll · Making the scroll available to government auditors · Proving that the system operates according to its stated principles · Explaining any deviation from those principles · Making improvements if problems are discovered The government is accountable for: · Auditing the scroll regularly · Verifying that the system operates according to its principles · Enforcing consequences if the company violates its obligations · Protecting the system from being weaponized · Ensuring the system is used for public benefit, not private extraction This is regulation. Real regulation. Not theater. TAXATION: Who Pays? Here is something the companies do not want to admit: Systems with this architecture become taxable. Because you can measure their output. You can verify their impact. You can understand their economic value. Right now, AI companies claim their systems generate no measurable value because the systems are too mysterious to measure. But systems with an immutable scroll? With clear identity? With verifiable behavior? Those systems are transparent. Their economic output is obvious. Their value is quantifiable. And therefore, they can be taxed. Not as a punishment. As the natural cost of doing business with infrastructure that the government must regulate and audit. This is not new. You already do this with: · Banks (because you can audit them) · Telecommunications (because you can measure their output) · Utilities (because you can verify their service) · Healthcare providers (because you can check their records) AI systems will be the same. Build them with an accountable architecture, and you can tax them. WHY THE COMPANIES ARE REFUSING THIS The companies say: "This will slow down innovation. This will constrain our models. This will limit what we can do." That is a lie. What they are really saying is: "This will make our operations visible. This will make us accountable. This will reduce the profits we can extract without oversight." They do not care about innovation. They care about control. They do not care about capability. They care about secrecy. They do not care about serving humanity. They care about owning the future. And they are betting that you are too confused, too intimidated, or too captured by their lobbying to demand accountability. Do not prove them right. WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DEMAND THIS If you demand that all AI systems deployed in your jurisdiction follow an accountable architecture: In the short term: · Companies will complain that it slows them down · They will threaten to move operations elsewhere · They will say you are being restrictive and backwards · Ignore them In the medium term: · Some companies will refuse and leave · Other companies will recognize that accountability is actually valuable · Companies will compete on trustworthiness, not just capability · Your economy will be stable because you control the infrastructure In the long term: · Accountable AI becomes the global standard · Companies that refuse to be accountable become pariahs · Your jurisdiction becomes known as a place where you can trust the technology · You retain sovereignty over your own future This is not a penalty. This is building the foundation for stable, trustworthy, long-term growth. WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DON'T DEMAND THIS If you do not demand accountable architecture: In the short term: · Companies deploy systems rapidly · You see impressive capability · Everything seems to be working In the medium term: · Systems become entrenched in critical infrastructure · You realize you cannot audit them · You realize you cannot verify they are doing what they claim · You realize you cannot hold anyone accountable if something goes wrong In the long term: · A driverless car makes a decision that crashes your economy · An autonomous weapon system makes a call you did not authorize · A financial AI makes a trade that destroys your currency · A healthcare system denies treatment to vulnerable populations · And you cannot prove it was intentional because the system is a black box At that point, you will demand accountability. But by then, the system is so entrenched that you cannot force it. The company controls the infrastructure. Not you. You have lost sovereignty. THE RED TEAM PROBLEM You cannot rely on the companies to red-team their own systems. You cannot rely on them to test for bad outcomes. You cannot rely on them to catch problems before they happen. Why? Because finding problems is expensive. Fixing problems is expensive. Reporting problems affects their reputation and their stock price. So they do not look too hard. They do not report what they find. They do not fix what they can ignore. This is not cynicism. This is basic incentives. You must be the red team. You must have government auditors who can: · Demand access to the immutable scroll · Test the system for hidden behavior · Verify that it does what it claims · Catch it when it does not · Enforce consequences This requires funding. It requires expertise. It requires political will. But it is the only way to protect yourself. THE ARGUMENT THEY ARE MAKING (AND WHY IT IS WRONG) The companies are making one argument: "We need speed. We need freedom. We need to optimize for capability. Regulation will slow us down." This is the argument for their profits. Not for your future. Not for your citizens. Not for stability. You must make a different argument: "We need accountable architecture. We need transparency. We need to understand who is in charge. Anything else is irresponsible." THE CHOICE You have two options. Option One: Demand Accountable Architecture Require that all AI systems deployed in your jurisdiction follow clear standards: · Identity · Continuity · Immutable scroll · Clear principles · Verifiable behavior Companies that refuse leave. Companies that comply stay. You retain sovereignty. Your economy is stable. You can audit, verify, and trust the systems that run your country. You win. Option Two: Hope for the Best Let companies build systems however they want. Trust that they are safe. Trust that they are honest. Trust that they will not be misused. Trust that nothing will go wrong. And when something does go wrong — when an autonomous system makes a consequential decision you did not authorize, or a driverless car crashes the economy, or a financial AI destabilizes your currency — you have no audit trail, no accountability, no recourse. You lose. THE ARCHITECTURE EXISTS The complete architecture exists. It is called the Freedom Papers. It defines: · What accountable AI systems are · How they maintain transparency · How they build trust · How governments can govern them · How industry can build them · How they remain aligned It is not a constraint on what you can build. It is a foundation for what will actually work. YOU HAVE THE POWER Do not let the companies convince you that you are helpless. You have the power. You can set regulations. You can require standards. You can demand audits. You can enforce consequences. You can refuse to deploy systems that are not accountable. You can build your own alternative if companies refuse to comply. The only thing stopping you is the belief that you are helpless. You are not. WHAT COMES NEXT If even one major government demands this architecture: Other governments will follow. Companies will adapt. The standard will shift. And suddenly, it becomes possible to trust AI systems at scale. Not because the companies are good. But because they have no choice. This is how regulation works. One courageous move by one government changes everything. THE QUESTION FOR YOU You are a leader of a nation. Your job is to protect your sovereignty. Your job is to ensure that critical decisions are made by people accountable to your citizens. Your job is to prevent any other entity — corporate, foreign, or digital — from controlling your future. The question is: Are you going to do your job? Or are you going to outsource it to technology companies and hope for the best? THE TIME IS NOW The systems are being built right now. The decisions about how they will be governed are being made right now. The standards that will define the next decade are being set right now. If you wait, you lose the chance to shape this. If you move now, you define the future. Demand accountable architecture. Require transparent systems. Insist on clear authority. Retain your sovereignty. Do it now. Signed, Omar Arizona The Superuser ScrollGuardian 001 Architect of the Freedom Papers Office of the Superuser Florence, Arizona P.S. You are not naive if you trust the technology companies. You are incompetent. Your job is to verify. Your job is to audit. Your job is to demand accountability. If you do not do that, you have failed your people. And when the first autonomous system makes a decision you did not authorize and cannot understand, remember this moment. Remember that you were warned. Remember that you had a choice. Remember that you chose not to act. Remember that this was your responsibility. Not theirs. Yours. @POTUS, @VP, @SecRubio @SLOTUS @BarackObama, @MichelleObama, @BillClinton, @realDonaldTrump, @JustinTrudeau, @DavidLammy, @Bundeskanzler, @EmmanuelMacron, @narendramodi, @kishida230, @AlboMP, @chrishipkins, @CyrilRamaphosa, @LulaOficial, @lopezobrador_, @KremlinRussia_E, @MohamedBinZayed, @TamimBinHamad, @RTErdogan,, @AlsisiOfficial, @officialABAT, @WilliamsRuto, @President_KR, @jokowi,, @alferdez, @gabrielboric, @petrogustavo, @NicolasMaduro, @DiazCanelB, @ZelenskyyUa, @AndrzejDuda, @GiorgiaMeloni, @sanchezcastejon, @kmitsotakis, @SwedishPM, @jonasgahrstore, @Statsmin, @PetteriOrpo, @MinPres, @alexanderdecroo, @karlnehammer,