That isn't just an uphill battle; it is a systemic barrier that limits your choices. A quarter of New Mexico’s electorate is now registered as independent or "decline to state." You deserve to have your voice represented without bureaucratic roadblocks. Because of this deeply unfair burden, I have officially taken legal action against the Secretary of State to challenge these requirements. We are asking the court to reduce the independent signature total to 7,100—cutting the arbitrary requirement in half to make ballot access fair. We already have the momentum. We already have 8,000 of you standing with us. Now, we are fighting to make sure those 8,000 voices are legally recognized. New Mexico deserves a governor who isn't beholden to rigid party lines or Washington politics. Let’s break down these barriers and build a government that finally works for all New Mexicans. koat.com/article/former-las-…

Maine Democratic primary poll results for the 2nd congressional district:

Sen. Lisa Murkowski just voted NO on advancing the SAVE America Act, a critical measure to require proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration and safeguard our elections from non-citizen voting. Her excuse? She claims it would disenfranchise too many rural Alaskans who supposedly can't get the necessary documents. Yet she admits she supports voter ID in principle—only not when it actually gets implemented to protect the integrity of our votes. This is exactly why real conservatives are fed up with RINOs who talk tough on election security but fold when it counts. Alaskans deserve senators who fight for secure borders at the ballot box, not make excuses that weaken our democracy. Time to remember in the next primary. 🇺🇸

Alaskans‼️ You know what to do! Call Murkowski’s office non stop and tell her you want the Save act passed‼️

The real question isn't capitalism versus socialism. The real question is: Who has meaningful political power to negotiate their interests? In a two-party system with first-past-the-post voting, regardless of whether you call it capitalist or socialist, power concentrates in whoever controls the binary choice. The economic label is almost irrelevant compared to the structural reality of how decisions get made. In a proportional multi-party system, you can have robust markets and strong social safety nets because multiple constituencies - workers, small business owners, rural communities, urban professionals, environmentalists - all have actual seats at the table and have to negotiate outcomes. Nobody gets to impose a pure ideological vision. Everything is compromise between competing legitimate interests. That's not capitalism. That's not socialism. That's pluralism with accountability mechanisms.