Calling on the #RulesCommittee to do the right thing & put the amendment to vote.

Calling all patriots, activists, and informed citizens: We need a bipartisan effort to support Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna in blocking Section 219 (previously 224) of the NDAA. If this provision passes, U.S. military technology will be permanently integrated with Israel’s. Here is the list of House Rules Committee members, with their names and phone numbers. Please call them and urge them to block Section 219. #NDAA #America #RulesCommittee @RulesReps

Now you know why @SpeakerJohnson kicked @RepThomasMassie off the #RulesCommittee.

This is why the traitor @SpeakerMikeJohnson kicked @RepThomasMassie off the #RulesCommittee.

The Governor does not have that power. However, we can write to RulesCommittee@council.nyc.gov to file a complaint

TAKE ACTION TODAY: Draft amendments to judicial practice book would encourage "preferred pronoun" usage in the courtroom Connecticut is considering amendments to the state’s judicial practice book, a guide to rules of procedure for the court. One of these amendments would encourage judges to use “Preferred Pronouns/Salutions” in the courtroom. Part of the draft change reads: “[...] courtesy includes treating individuals in a manner that is objectively respectful of gender identity. This rule is intended to avoid the misgendering of litigants and attorneys by the judicial authority[...].” While the amendments would not mandate that judges (or anyone else) use “preferred pronouns”, it seems likely that these changes would ultimately result in women witnesses and plaintiffs being encouraged or instructed by judges to “respect” male perpetrators of violence by referring to them using female pronouns. Calling male rapists “she” and “her” retraumatizes victims, confuses jurors and observers, and leads to inaccurate data on patterns of criminality. To submit a comment regarding the Connecticut Practice Book (Section 3-4A), Notice of Preferred Pronouns/Salutations, email RulesCommittee@jud.ct.gov. Comments are due before the end of the day TODAY, Wednesday, April 29. Respondents do not need to be residents of Connecticut.

Don’t act you care about women while you actively disenfranchise women of our vote. We know you along with McConnell, Cornyn & Collins voted against instructing the Chamber RulesCommittee to add Save American Act to the Budget reconciliation. You’re re an embarrassment to women

#CongressmanMassie: #election2026 #USConstitution #Trump #ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles #DOJ #PamBondi; #IceFunding #Obamacaresubsidies #minnesotacorruption #WasteFraudAbuse #GovernmentBudget #RulesCommittee... 55krc.iheart.com/featured/br…

🚨 LEAKED: INSIDE THE RULES COMMITTEE Hunter Bradshaw. Alex Ives. Bryan McVae. Good morning sleepy heads. ☀️ If the #MajorStarAct gets added to the $3B mini bus today, you won't hear from me again. If not, I hope you have a steady supply of Motrin on hand for the rest of 2026. Take 2, change your socks, and get ready for 54,000 Vets' sole focus turning from @SenatorWicker to @virginiafoxx You saw what we did to @SenatorWicker in Tupelo Mississippi. His staff failed to protect his legacy and hometown reputation. If you haven't seen the news coverage check the comments in this post. Looking forward to forgetting you or giving you headaches either way. No stress for us. @passtheactorg @54KVeterans CC: @SpeakerJohnson @SteveScalise @RepStefanik @TomColeOK04 #Leaked #RulesCommittee #VirginiaFoxx #Veterans #Motrin #Karen @BskiMike22802 @davidmedic81 @catturd2 @GuntherEagleman

IS THIS "REGULAR ORDER," MADAM CHAIRWOMAN? @virginiafoxx, look at this. You pride yourself on "Order" and "Process." But this is the result of your Rules Committee blocking the #MajorRichardStarAct. By protecting the $3 Billion in pork (the check) while blocking the vote for veterans, you have decided that earmarks belong in the bank, and the American Flag belongs in the trash. We are watching the "Minibus" drive away while our legacy rots in the alley. You have the gavel. You can change the Rule. Don't let this be the final image of your Chairmanship. @SpeakerJohnson @SteveScalise @RepStefanik @TomColeOK04 #SwampMinibus #RulesCommittee #Veterans #VirginiaFoxx

ବିଧାନସଭାର କାର୍ଯ୍ୟଧାରାରେ ବ୍ୟାପକ ପରିବର୍ତ୍ତନର ଆବଶ୍ୟକତା ରହିଛି…ଦ୍ରୁତଗତିରେ କାମ କରିବାରେ ଆବଶ୍ୟକତା ରହିଛି…ତେଣୁ ରୁଲ୍ସ କମିଟି ଦ୍ବାରା ପରିବର୍ତ୍ତନ ଆବଶ୍ୟକ: ଅରୁଣ ସାହୁ, ବିଜେଡି ବିଧାୟକ #OdishaAssembly #ArunKumarSahu #BJD #LegislativeReforms #RulesCommittee #OdishaPolitics #OTV

youtu.be/c7VcAXNGOG8?si=QxZi… @POTUS @WhiteHouse @GOP #EXPOSED @VansenEric @MeidasTouch @WarrenBuffett @_BreakTheCode_ @carlosvictorva6 @munciecarl @StrengthLe49497 #LMFAO #RulesCommittee #CrossExamine #MAGA #Hillariously #REDICULOUS #Exemplifies #TAKINGITALLBACK #CRACKINMETHEFUCKUP

💬We Spoke To One Of The DC RC Members About What REALLY goes into the banlist, meta calls, and format philosophy? 🎥 Watch the full discussion: youtu.be/yfPC5-SQq5s Tagging @fireshoes for visibility and value #DuelCommander #MagicTheGathering #MtG #RulesCommittee

What is the current status of the #MajorStarAct ? Did @RepGusBilirakis's proposed amendment to #FY26NDAA get thru the #RulesCommittee ? Did the full House approve it by voice vote as part of an en bloc ?

They tried W/i hours of Charlie Kirk’s murder, Trump went live from behind the Resolute Desk, falsely blamed it on a conspiracy of the “radical left” W/i hours of the Reichstag Fire, Hitler blamed it on a communist conspiracy—& created a dictatorship @AP mind-war.com/p/god-given-sig…

h/t See Trump’s response incl Ai how quickly they had it prepared convinced MAGA just sacrificed Charlie Kirk in an effort to save Trump from Epstein Files & wars he can’t stop Dude giving baseball signs while standing perfectly to side of bullet track …& the shooter vanished?

The #allegations against Senator #Klobuchar are serious but unproven. They rely on Bernegger’s assertions, which lack independent corroboration from a governmental or judicial body as of today. It’s possible the funds cited could be legitimate small donations aggregated in a way that appears suspicious, or they could indicate irregularities—only an investigation can determine this. Proving #smurfing requires evidence of intent to launder money and evade reporting thresholds (e.g., the $10,000 cash transaction limit under the Patriot Act). This would require financial records, donor intent documentation, or other forensic evidence, which is not yet publicly available. Note: Proving smurfing requires evidence of #intent to launder money and evade reporting thresholds (e.g., the $10,000 cash transaction limit under the Patriot Act). This would need financial records, donor intent documentation, or other forensic evidence, which is not publicly available. As Senate #RulesCommittee #RankingMember, Klobuchar has publicly criticized the DOJ for failing to refer campaign finance complaints to the FEC [Klobuchar Expresses Concern over Reported DOJ Failure to Notify FEC of Campaign Finance Complaint - klobuchar.senate.gov] (klobuchar.senate.gov), suggesting she supports accountability in this area. This stance could be seen as inconsistent with someone knowingly engaging in such activities.

#SpeakerJohnson & House #Republicans have shut down the #RulesCommittee, canceling House votes this week & have stopped work on most legislation to avoid voting on Dem amendments to #ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles. #TrumpPedoFiles #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinCoverUp #TrumpEpsteinCoverup

House Republicans Block Epstein Files Release: Transparency Denied or Political Ploy? On July 14, 2025, House Republicans on the Rules Committee voted 5-6 to block a Democratic amendment proposed by Rep. Ro Khanna, which aimed to force the Department of Justice (DOJ) to fully release the Jeffrey Epstein files. This decision has sparked intense debate, with critics arguing that the American public deserves complete transparency regarding the controversial case. The DOJ, in a July 7 memo, clarified that no "client list" exists, though some documents have been released previously. Despite this, calls for a full disclosure of the Epstein files continue to grow, with many questioning why the government seems hesitant to release all relevant information. Rep. Ro Khanna, backed by voices like Rep. Ralph Norman, expressed frustration, stating, "People are fed up. They are fed up." The 5-7 Rules Committee vote prevented the amendment from reaching the full House for a vote, intensifying public distrust and fueling accusations of prioritizing party loyalty over accountability. Why are House Republicans blocking this move? Is it a matter of procedure, or is there more at play? This video dives into the details of the Epstein case, the blocked amendment, and what it means for government transparency. We’ll explore the arguments on both sides, the DOJ’s stance, and the growing demand for the truth. Join the conversation—should the Epstein files be fully released? Let us know in the comments! Join us as we connect the dots, challenge the narratives, and delve into the heart of these off-topic yet deeply impactful events. Don't miss out on this exclusive content! Use code 'OFFTOPIC' for 20% off your subscription to Compound Censored and unlock a world of exclusive content. Experience the freedom of speech in its purest form, only on Compound Censored. Support Via linktr.ee/OffTopicShow Follow Off Topic Show on Instagram: instagram.com/videomattprese… instagram.com/theofficialoff… Follow On X x.com/OffTopicShow2 Youtube youtube.com/@OffTopicShow Join The Community discord.gg/FmHAEJYFTw White Noize - Chillin - itunes.apple.com/album/id182… For exclusive show gear shop at stayhighlypositive.com #EpsteinFiles #HouseRepublicans #RoKhanna #DOJ #Transparency #GovernmentAccountability #JeffreyEpstein #Politics2025 #RulesCommittee #PublicTrust #CompoundCensored #OffTopicShow

This has nothing to do with who is involved in the play. If you don't want to better understand how the rules work, that's your right as a citizen in this country (for now). But I'd recommend directing your anger to rulescommittee@nba.com thx