𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗳𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗿 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝘆: 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗛𝗮𝘀 𝗕𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗣𝘀𝗲𝘂𝗱𝗼 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲
Renowned climatologist Dr. Judith Curry warns that climate science has devolved into pseudoscience, driven by careerism and political pressures rather than open inquiry. She debunks the myth of a 97% consensus, calling it a flawed narrative based on biased surveys that misrepresent scientific agreement. Curry explains that while there's consensus on basic facts like post-19th century warming and CO2's warming potential, deep disagreements persist on key issues: the human contribution to warming, future temperature projections, and whether warming is dangerous.
Curry highlights how funding, tenure, and professional advancement are tied to toeing the consensus line, stifling debate and punishing dissenters. She resigned from academia in 2017 due to this "consensus enforcement," which she says creates a toxic environment where scientists must "dance to the same drumbeat" or face marginalization.
On extreme weather, Curry asserts there's no evidence of increases beyond natural variability—contrary to media hype. She criticizes climate models for their inability to accurately handle natural factors, leading to exaggerated risks. The demonization of CO2, she argues, stems from a political agenda dating back to the 1980s, pushing unfeasible net-zero policies that distract from real environmental issues.
Curry advocates decoupling energy policy from climate alarmism, emphasizing the need for abundant, reliable energy like nuclear power to drive human progress. She notes that pursuing net zero won't yield noticeable climate benefits for centuries and calls for a return to traditional environmental values, such as reducing vulnerability to weather events through better infrastructure.
In this interview, Curry exposes how politics has corrupted science, leading to misleading narratives that harm both research and policy. :To read the full article go to
wattsupwiththat.com/2025/06/…