Eye & orbit motion, part II Orbital, preseptal, and pretarsal areas roughly marked to show how different contractions affect different regions 👀 More expression references for animation & aesthetics: melindaozel.com #animation #3danim #aesthetics

Dilated to a 1, but contractions stopped, and we're back to intermittent cramping. Everything looks fine, so we're going home to sleep comfy, and we'll see what happens in the next few days.

VID SOLD! Footy Selfworship in the Car w/Orgasm Contractions 🔥 Check it out! manyvids.com/Video/7556698/F… #MVSales @manyvids

*you're Or you can say, "Just means you are a coward to express yourself," if contractions are too difficult for you.

The 20 hours of labor when it was still too soon to go to the hospital to deliver my first baby. My water had not broken yet and my contractions were too far apart so I would’ve just sat at the hospital racking up the bill.

Im down bad , im like in a ball .. almost feels like the damn contractions all over again .. not having a good time rn😔

Truthful enough, though just because you can use it doesn't mean you should It's like using can't in a job application. It's shorter, and correct, but using contractions in a formal context is unprofessional Likewise, your interviewer might not be happy if you called him "them."

C-Diff after taking Augmentin for a sinus infection. Lasted for hours and days. Was far worse than contractions when my kids were born.

It's contractions now. Tracked 8 in the past hour. Not particularly painful. But Jon is on his way home.

Cute blonde👱🏼‍♀️ rubs herself to big orgasmic contractions 😍💦🍑✨ #pussycontractions #orgasmcontractions #nsfw #pussy #nsfwtwt #blondegirl #pinkpussy #wetpussy #anal #booty #pawg #whitepussy #teenpussy #cumming FOLLOW ME YOU FUCKING GOONERS!! @PrinceZ4n3 🌹🌷

Cheryl, your post is a textbook example of the selective, evidence-free optimism that has justified Canada’s self-inflicted economic pain under successive Liberal continuity from Trudeau to Carney. Canada does not “benefit” from global warming in any policy-relevant way that excuses ignoring verifiable costs at home. Our cold climate and vast geography make reliable, affordable energy a non-negotiable foundation for prosperity, not a luxury to trade away for speculative planetary gains from policies where our 1.1-1.5% share of global emissions delivers statistical noise. Your framing dodges the receipts: we hold the world’s third-largest oil reserves, produce some of the lowest-emissions-intensity barrels, yet import roughly 40% of our crude while Bill C-69, industrial carbon pricing, UNDRIP vetoes, and regulatory delays stall over $670 billion in resource projects. Paleoclimate proxies, ice cores, and historical records show temperatures leading CO2 by centuries in deglaciations, driven by Milankovitch cycles, solar variability, ocean circulations, and water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas. The Holocene Climatic Optimum was warmer than today with lower CO2; the Younger Dryas delivered rapid swings with stable greenhouse gases. Today’s ~1.1°C rise since the Little Ice Age fits Holocene variability. Human fossil contributions account for roughly 60 ppm (~14-15%) of the post-industrial rise to ~425 ppm; the 2020 emissions drop saw atmospheric CO2 still rise. CMIP6 models overpredict tropospheric warming against satellite, balloon, and ARGO data, with admitted uncertainties in clouds and feedbacks. Your cheerleading for heat pumps, solar, and wind as “already economical” with “health benefits” ignores engineering and economic reality in Canada’s conditions. Intermittency demands reliable backups; carbon taxes and mandates have driven up household costs while offshoring emissions and jobs to coal-heavy competitors. BC’s consumer carbon tax extracted billions with negligible global temperature or sea-level impact. Families of four face projected grocery bills of ~$17,572 in 2026, up nearly $1,000 year-over-year and 27% in five years, amid record food bank usage and one in four households food-insecure. We are the only G7 economy in technical recession with GDP contractions in late 2025/early 2026, combined public debt exceeding $2.3-2.4 trillion after nine straight deficits, productivity at ~71% of U.S. levels, and taxes consuming 42-43% of median family income while real wages erode. These outcomes flow directly from the narrative you defend: prioritizing distant IPCC projections and global signalling over domestic evidence. Carney’s continuity, methane agreements, electricity strategies, European courtship, and “new world order” rhetoric, distracts from stalled projects, brain drain, and integration with our indispensable U.S. partner (75% of exports via NORAD and supply chains geography demands we respect). Skepticism is not support for “centralized power structures”, it is rejection of them when they deliver managed decline measured in empty fridges, higher heating bills, and eroded sovereignty. Evidence-based reform is straightforward: fiscal discipline to bend the debt curve; all-of-the-above energy abundance (responsible oil/gas/LNG displacing dirtier imports, hydro, SMR nuclear) under statutory timelines; immigration tied to infrastructure and housing capacity; fast-track modern treaties with finality, clear title, individual property rights, and uniform Charter rules ending race-based vetoes and parallel systems; restored clinical and individual autonomy with no public-health or identity exceptions. Measure every policy by verifiable outcomes: lower costs, more jobs, higher productivity, prosperity for citizens first. One Charter standard applied equally to all. Canadians live these failures daily. Precision over propaganda. Evidence over excuses. Citizens first. Canada first. Barry E. Sharp π ≈ 3.14159 🇨🇦

How much of that wealth is liquid? Do to what you suggest would sell off vast amounts of unrealized gains and other assets. Which such a withdraw would shock every market on Earth causing global economic contractions. A better fix would be higher taxes on loans against unrealized gains and how they are paid back.

Gosh it’s gotta be a receiving an epidural ( when i could feel the needle going in the entire time) at the same time as labor transition contractions, was probably around 8 cm. But catheters with no pain killers was pretty bad so I sympathize.

Cheryl, your defense of the climate establishment misses the point entirely and recycles the same evasive tactics that have justified trillions in wasted spending, eroded Canadian sovereignty, and delivered measurable economic pain with zero verifiable planetary benefit. No serious skeptic claims climate scientists literally say “CO2 is the only knob”, that’s a convenient straw man. The actual issue is the dominant policy narrative and IPCC-centered framing that treats human CO2 emissions as the primary control knob for dangerous anthropogenic global warming, justifying urgent net-zero mandates, carbon pricing, regulatory chokeholds like Bill C-69, and stalled resource projects while downplaying natural variability, model failures, and adaptation. Paleoclimate data from ice cores and proxies repeatedly show temperatures leading CO2 changes by centuries during deglaciations, driven by Milankovitch cycles, solar variability, ocean circulations (AMO/PDO/AMOC), clouds, and water vapor, the dominant greenhouse gas. The Holocene Climatic Optimum was warmer than today with lower CO2, the Younger Dryas delivered rapid multi-degree swings with stable greenhouse gases. Today’s ~1.1°C rise fits recovery from the Little Ice Age within Holocene variability. Human fossil contributions, per isotopic mass balance (Suess effect, δ¹³C), account for roughly 60 ppm or ~14-15% of the post-industrial rise to ~425 ppm. Natural ocean degassing and biosphere fluxes dominate the rest. During the 2020 lockdowns, global human emissions dropped sharply (human share is only 3-4% of the annual carbon cycle), yet atmospheric CO2 kept rising. Canada emits just 1.1-1.5% of global totals, our instant net-zero would be statistical noise while hammering our cold geography with higher heating/transport costs, offshoring jobs/emissions to coal-heavy competitors, and deindustrialization. BC’s 15 year carbon tax extracted billions with negligible relative cuts and zero detectable global temperature or sea-level impact. CMIP6 models routinely overpredict tropospheric warming against satellite (UAH/RSS), balloon, and ARGO data, with massive uncertainties in clouds and feedbacks that IPCC reports themselves admit. This isn’t “settled science” enabling precise attribution of every weather event to CO2, it’s narrative enforcement that props up policies Canadians live with daily. Under Trudeau-to-Carney continuity, we’ve racked up persistent deficits, combined public debt exceeding $2.3-2.4 trillion, a technical recession with GDP contractions in late 2025/early 2026 (only G7 economy in that spot), productivity at ~71% of U.S. levels, families of four facing ~$17,500 in annual groceries (up sharply), record food bank use, and one in four households food-insecure. Over $670 billion in resource projects stalled by regulatory thickets, UNDRIP vetoes shredding Charter Section 15 equality, and carbon pricing. We hold the world’s third-largest oil reserves, produce among the lowest-emissions-intensity barrels, yet import ~40% of our crude. Taxes devour 42-43% of median family income while real wages erode. Your post ignores these receipts while shielding a framework that prioritizes distant projections and global signalling over evidence-based realism: all-of-the-above energy (oil/gas/LNG displacing dirtier imports, hydro, SMR nuclear) under statutory timelines, fiscal discipline, immigration tied to infrastructure, uniform Charter rules ending parallel systems, and focus on adaptation plus verifiable metrics over unfalsifiable alarm. Geography, integrated North American supply chains (75% of exports to the U.S.), and NORAD demand pragmatic sovereignty, not performative globalism or European technocracy that imports stagnation. Canadians deserve policies measured by outcomes: affordability, jobs, productivity, and prosperity for citizens first. One Charter standard applied equally. Precision over propaganda. Evidence over excuses. Canada first. Barry E. Sharp

1. Most likely diagnosis: Acute dystonic reaction (extrapyramidal side effect). 2. Trigger drug: Usually a dopamine antagonist antiemetic such as metoclopramide or prochlorperazine given IV. 3. Pathophysiology: Dopamine blockade in basal ganglia → relative cholinergic excess → involuntary muscle contractions. 4. Clinical features: Oculogyric crisis (eyes fixed upward), torticollis (neck twisting), trismus (jaw locking), patient remains conscious. 5. Key distinction: Looks like seizure but no loss of consciousness or post-ictal state. 6. Management: Immediate administration of anticholinergic drugs (benztropine or diphenhydramine) with rapid resolution.

and it's not even a TRUE heartbeat. The heart hasn't even formed yet at 6 weeks, that's just an electrical PULSE that we now have machines sensitive enough to register... the heart has yet to form around the signal to make use of it for muscle contractions. a convenient lie.

Prodromal labor is literally the worseeeee. I made it through tho, I think with this baby I could’ve went natural, BUT I was just tired of laboring for 7 days. I was exhausted from no rest because of hours of contractions.

Worst-case global population scenario (sustained ultra-low fertility ~1.3–1.5 TFR worldwide, accelerating cohort shrinkage, minimal rebound): World population peaks near 8.8–9.0 billion around 2050, then declines sharply. By 2075: ~7.5–8.0 billion. By 2100: 5.5–7.0 billion (potentially lower in extreme tails). East Asia, Europe, and China face 50–75% contractions from current peaks, with exploding elderly dependency ratios. Sub-Saharan Africa’s growth stalls earlier than expected. Global labor shortages, strained pensions, economic stagnation, and geopolitical instability intensify as working-age populations collapse and innovation slows from fewer young people. Long-term contraction accelerates post-2100.