UK benefits are so high... That they are the lowest in the Developed World.

Gary Lineker, "I actually think that 80-90% of the country just want to get on with their lives, be friendly with their neighbours" "They don't look at people of different religions, skin colours, beliefs, traits, and think badly of them" Who agrees with Gary True words to me

CBS canceled Stephen Colbert to appease Trump. Now a growing movement across the United States is calling for a boycott of CBS. Do you support it? #BoycottCBS

Water UK says water companies won’t treat whole classes of pollutants because it is not legally required. The big NGOs say no new laws are needed. That is functional alignment. Stop the soft-ask scam. Update the law. #EndSewagePollution @RiverActionUK @sascampaigns @WaterUK

The Epstein Files reveal that former U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Earl Anthony Wayne impregnated an 11 year old

Come on @Ofcom. We cannot continue to allow a UK TV channel with the word "news" in its title to regularly promote misleading and sensationalised headlines as factual reporting. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a written statement to Congress criticising several NATO allies, particularly European ones, for insufficient support during US/Israeli operations against Iran in 2026. He described their reluctance as "unconscionable", warned that "we will remember", and spoke of "consequences" for those who fail to "step up". He highlighted "model allies" including Israel, South Korea, Poland, Finland, and the Baltic states. The UK and France were notably omitted. This reflects ongoing friction: the UK under Keir Starmer initially refused US requests to use British bases for offensive strikes against Iran, citing legal and international concerns, while later permitting limited defensive use. The UK provided defensive assets such as Typhoon jets, HMS Dragon, and mine-hunting support in the Strait of Hormuz, but declined full offensive involvement or participation in a US-led blockade. The headline is misleading because no formal removal of Britain from any official US allies list occurred. Core elements of the US-UK relationship (NATO membership, intelligence sharing, and military bases) remain fully intact. This was rhetorical criticism and prioritisation of certain partners, NOT a policy decision to downgrade the alliance. It is classic clickbait framing that implies a dramatic diplomatic rupture. GB News, which has strong editorial and personnel links to Reform UK (including multiple current or former Reform MPs and figures as presenters), amplifies such stories in a manner that follows a clear pattern of partisan criticism of the UK government. This is not consistent with the standards expected of a licensed UK news broadcaster. By all means, report legitimate US frustration with European allies and debate NATO burden-sharing. But do not mislead British viewers and voters by falsely claiming Britain has been removed as a US ally. The wider harms are real and cumulative. Sensational framing erodes trust in media, fosters general scepticism, and makes it harder for the public to identify genuine issues. It intensifies political polarisation, distorts understanding of foreign policy, and risks signalling Western disunity to adversaries. In the broader media environment, it reinforces clickbait incentives over accuracy and weakens democratic discourse and national cohesion. @Ofcom is fully aware of this repeated pattern yet has consistently failed to take sufficient regulatory action to prevent it. This regulatory inaction is itself damaging public trust in media oversight and allowing harm to British democracy to continue unchecked. It is time for Ofcom to properly enforce broadcasting standards.

Just this. 85% of 18-25 year olds (none of whom could vote in the 2016 referendum) want to rejoin the EU. Only an idiot government would ignore this overwhelming statistic, don’t you think?