Check out our new publication (link below)
Recently, we published the first part of
@sshshln “On Acephalic Intelligence and the General Economy of Computation,” which argued that AI should be understood less as frictionless interface intelligence than as a planetary regime of expenditure—one that consumes water, electricity, labor, extraction, and attention while aestheticizing those costs through the language of optimization. Drawing on Bataille, Shilina introduced “acephalic intelligence” to describe AI as a headless assemblage of infrastructures, institutions, standards, and compute flows that concentrates power without a single sovereign subject.
Part two carries that argument forward by examining the regimes of surplus, sacrifice, sovereignty, and waste that structure contemporary AI more deeply. It tracks how training converts cultural and social traces into model-capacity through a logic of sacrificial destruction, how governance migrates into platforms, protocols, and pipelines, and how hallucination, overproduction, and synthetic plausibility reveal a broader economy of excess rather than isolated technical defects. In doing so, Shilina shifts the terms of analysis beyond familiar debates around bias, transparency, or explainability, toward the more fundamental question of how computational systems organize expenditure, distribute loss, and render those losses politically legible or invisible. The result is a more exact account of AI as a headless but highly operative order of power, and of the narrowing but still possible space for refusal, counter-ritual, and constraint within it.