Joined July 2011
41 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
23 Nov 2023
Replying to @SadiqKhan
Stop with this far-right nonsense. The dichotomy is people who want more, authoritarian top-down controls (such as you) and people who want less. Big gov with big capital and labour unions ... all telling us how to live for our own good. Left's agenda is basically fascism. No?
4
2
16
2,374
Wing Ding retweeted
Platypus is so weird that the scientists who first discovered it thought it was fake. The European explorers assumed an egg-laying, duck-billed, beaver-tailed, otter-footed, venomous mammal had to be an elaborate hoax
8
26
130
11,844
Wing Ding retweeted
Bloody hell, I’ve been digging more into the government definition of 'Crisis' a bit more So... an unelected regulator is now operating within government where the meaning of “crisis” has become very stretched. The Cabinet Office Amber Book says an emergency under the Civil Contingencies Act covers serious damage to human welfare, the environment or UK security. (fair enough) But then it has added ... “For the purposes of this guidance, the terms emergency and crisis are used interchangeably.”... INTERCHANGEABLY? It also says an emergency/crisis can include situations that have not yet been harmful but have the potential to be (they do not define 'harmful' This guidance has not been voted for or debated So let me explain why thats so important. it means that almost any situation the government believes could become a problem can now be treated as a 'crisis'. And under that broad language, Ofcom has been able to write to platforms about civil unrest, crisis situations and how they will need to beef up moderation, it isnt just about removing illegal content. Anything could become a “crisis”, no one voted for the widening of the definition and no one had the opportunity to, because thats how government by guidance works.... hoping you won't even notice.
96
958
2,260
37,862
Wing Ding retweeted
£700,000 for Migrants. 18,000 Homeless in Manchester. That's the Burnham Method. Andy Burnham is asking the voters of Makerfield to send him to Westminster. Before they do, they should know what he has been doing with their money in Manchester. This week it emerged that Burnham's Greater Manchester Combined Authority is spending £722,685 on schemes to help migrants navigate the British welfare system. The Safe Transitions programme will provide guidance in multiple languages helping refugees understand their rights, entitlements and access to housing, benefits and public services. A Refugee Lodging Scheme will match refugees with resident landlords who will support them to access housing, benefits, employment, education and community networks. Greater Manchester already hosts more than 8,500 people in asylum support accommodation. More than 18,000 people across the region have no permanent address. One in every 61 people in Manchester alone is homeless. The £700,000 is not going to them. This is not a one-off decision. It is the visible expression of a consistent set of political instincts that Burnham has spent years developing and is now quietly concealing ahead of June 18. Since 2019 he has repeatedly called for the abolition of the No Recourse to Public Funds policy, the rule that prevents migrants from immediately accessing Britain's welfare state and social housing. He called for it on his mayoral website in 2019. He signed a joint letter demanding it in 2023. He launched a pilot programme in Manchester called the Living Income Campaign, designed to top up the incomes of those living under NRPF conditions and build the case for scrapping the rule nationally. He has now quietly dropped that position. Not because he has changed his mind. Because he is campaigning in Makerfield. His allies have confirmed that as Prime Minister he would tear up the multi-billion pound Home Office contracts with private asylum accommodation providers and hand responsibility to local councils. Dispersal housing rather than hotels. The saving is real. Hotel rooms cost £145 per person per night against £23.25 for dispersal housing. But dispersal housing means more migrants placed directly into communities like Makerfield, Wigan and the surrounding boroughs, without the visibility of a hotel that can be identified and closed. The cost saving comes with a community cost that nobody is discussing. Meanwhile Makerfield itself tells a different story to the one Burnham is presenting on the doorstep. The constituency sits within a region where Reform won all eight council wards in May's local elections with around fifty percent of the vote. Around two thirds of the constituency voted Leave in 2016. The voters who went to Reform did so because they feel their communities have been transformed without consent, their housing lists lengthened, their public services stretched and their concerns dismissed. Burnham's answer to those concerns is to spend £700,000 helping more migrants access the same overstretched system. The repositioning on NRPF is the tell. A politician who held a position for six years, built a pilot programme around it and signed letters demanding it nationally does not abandon it because he has been persuaded by the evidence. He abandons it because the polling in Makerfield made it electorally inconvenient. The same thing happened with his position on EU rejoining, held on Saturday and walked back by Sunday when his team realised around two thirds of the constituency voted Leave. The voters of Makerfield are not being asked to elect a mayor. They are being asked to send a potential Prime Minister to Westminster. The £700,000 tells them more about what that Prime Minister would do than any doorstep conversation. It tells them what he does when nobody in Makerfield is watching. "One in every 61 people in Manchester alone is homeless. The £700,000 is not going to them."
226
3,036
5,175
247,346
"The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist."
The BBC Has Ruled. Brexit Damaged The Economy. No Further Debate Required. The BBC's editorial complaints unit has decided that the negative economic impact of Brexit is now a settled fact. Not a contested judgement. Not one side of a live debate. A fact, in the same category as man-made climate change, requiring no balancing view. The ruling followed a Radio 4 Today programme segment featuring Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, alongside Liam Byrne and Sir John Gieve, both long-standing advocates of closer EU alignment. All three agreed Brexit had damaged growth. The presenter, Katya Adler, did not challenge the premise or introduce a dissenting voice. A complaint followed. The ECU's response is the revealing part. It acknowledged the segment failed to "acknowledge the alternative case" for pursuing opportunities outside the EU rather than realignment with it. That part of the complaint was upheld. But the central complaint, that three pro-EU voices agreeing with each other on air is not balance, was dismissed. The reasoning given was that this reflected "the consensus among economists" and there was no "significant body of economic opinion" on the other side. This is worth pausing on. The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist. The institution that is legally required to be impartial has ruled itself the arbiter of which questions are still open and which are closed, and Brexit has just been moved into the closed file. The economics itself does not support the certainty on display. The headline figure driving much of this narrative, an 8 per cent hit to GDP since 2016, comes from an NBER paper built on a "synthetic control" model that constructs a hypothetical non-Brexit Britain from a basket of comparator countries. The largest weighting in that basket, over 60 per cent, is the United States, a country currently riding an AI investment boom and a separate fiscal stimulus. The model also weights Estonia and Greece more heavily than France or Germany. On a straightforward per capita basis against France and Germany, the actual comparators, Britain's performance since 2016 sits roughly in line with both. An 8 per cent gap simply isn't visible. This is a model producing a number that then gets reported as "the consensus," which the BBC then cites as the reason no alternative view is required. That loop, model produces number, number becomes consensus, consensus becomes fact, fact requires no balance, is the mechanism. It does not require a conspiracy. It requires an institution that has decided which conclusions are respectable and which are not, and which then treats its own prior decision as evidence. The same posture has been on display all week. A government department can decide its diversity targets are lawful without seeking legal advice to check. A police force can decide a book about dismantling "inner white supremacy" is leadership training. A broadcaster can decide an economic question is closed and that deciding so does not breach its own impartiality rules. In each case, the institution marks its own homework, and the mark is always a pass. None of this requires Brexit to have been a triumph. Britain's economy has genuine problems, most of them unrelated to single market membership. But a state broadcaster, funded by compulsory licence fee under threat of prosecution, has now formally placed one of the most consequential political decisions in modern British history beyond the reach of its own impartiality obligations. Reform's Lee Anderson called it being "blinkered by groupthink." The more precise description is an institution that has stopped being able to tell the difference between its own assumptions and the facts. "The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist."
1
18
Wing Ding retweeted
What an absolute egotistical PR*CK. SELF APPOINTED climate hypocrite. Energy DICTATOR. Net Zero GRIFTER. Running a scam on your bills while flying 50,000 miles on YOUR money. The man who wants to FREEZE YOU while he flies. Lying to your face from day one. £400 holiday tax on your family. £87,000 of your money on flights. More domestic flights than the Conservatives. Refused to say how many. No solar panels on his own house. Never once lived by a single rule he writes for you. Britain produces 1% of global emissions. China 32%. Two new coal power stations every week. Adds more in a week than Britain saves in a year. Your North Sea destroyed. Your appliances banned. Highest energy bills in the developed world. Even Tony Blair said the sacrifices will have no impact. While China laughs. Bills up 6.4%. He promised £300 off. His own government website admitted bills will go up. His own expert said savings could be wiped out. His department refused to comment. £900 per household in renewables subsidies. He knew. He lied. Repeatedly. This is not about the climate. It is about control. Who controls your energy. Your choices. Your life. 1% of global emissions. Destroyed for nothing. While China laughs and Miliband flies. That is not a policy. That is a punishment. Net zero for you. Net gain for him. No solar panels on his roof. Hand in your pocket. One percent. That is Britain's contribution. That is also what you matter to him.
134
1,070
2,650
25,688
Yep. A huge angle of the climate scam has been that renewable energy is cheaper. It is not. At all. It is inefficient and unpredictable, needs more transmission lines, needs massive built-in backup. That's pretty obvious, really. A huge hidden cost is the incredible difficulty of balancing variable power to achieve a stable grid, as Spain found out. UK has ostensibly been v close to major brownouts a few times. That makes these countries riskier to invest in too...(and they all have national debt at levels unthinkable 2 decades ago.) The variability impacts energy markets too. Wholesale elec and gas markets were once stable and boring. Not now. Volatility and uncertainty inherently increase costs and risk. And then there is the carbon tax. An arbitrary figure with absolutely no relationship to anything simply imposed on the economy. And then there are the regulations, the scam of companies having to conduct carbon audits, comply with ISO14001 (what a travesty of ISO). And the EV enforced sales. And the LEZs. And the hidden impacts these have on making everything costlier. So - a less efficient and secure energy system that costs more. A staggering ongoing amount of taxpayers money spent to achieve that. And zero demonstrable benefit to anything or anyone.

9
Wing Ding retweeted
Cheney assigned Fauci to head all US biodefense research programs in 2002, including research programs that equated to, and were intended as, offensive biological warfare research programs conducted in violation of the Biological Weapons Convention. theblaze.com/news/damning-ne…
For nearly 20 years, Dr. Anthony Fauci was wired into America's intelligence and defense apparatus. Newly released documents from our investigation show how that access let him shape the COVID-19 origins debate — across science, the IC, and the public. 🧵 READ MORE: hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/…
13
45
99
9,830
Wing Ding retweeted
"Both of them should have been dead" A Karmelo Anthony supporter outside the courthouse in Collin County, Texas says the convicted black m—rderer should have killed the victim's brother too. Video by @nicksortor:

439
504
3,021
124,383
Wing Ding retweeted
Politicians are intentionally deluding themselves into thinking this isn't organic. Normal people have had years of being told a million immigrants a year is good actually, and if you don't agree you're a nazi. All while being taxed into oblivion, not being able to afford a house and, if they are lucky to work, watching their earnings stagnate. Then they turn on the news or social media and see Pakistani rape gangs, Sudanese beheading attempts and asylum seekers blowing up concerts with bombs paid for by benefit fraud. And if they have the temerity to complain, they risk 6 officers showing up at 4am to have a stern word, search thier PC and log a non crime hate crime. These rioters feel no different to most people, they are just the ones with the least to lose by acting. They certainly aren't being inspired by anyone, in the same way BLM rioters weren't, they are naturally angry. The social contract is broken and it's getting worse, but those in charge show no interest in fixing it. They don't even want to acknowledge it exists.
Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!
24
142
593
12,981
Wing Ding retweeted
Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!
16,634
93,539
583,509
53,827,654
RT @BellaYafa: Yesterday I volunteered at the elections in Las Vegas. I checked in voters. I smiled. I did my job. Then a woman walked in…
613
Wing Ding retweeted
Net Zero is an absolute disaster for our nations.
Earth is not facing urgent climate-related damage, despite claims embedded in the United Nations' 40-year grand plan. The real damage can be measured in global instability and widespread economic and industrial decline. The estimated price tag for this UN agenda is a staggering $275 trillion by 2050 (based on a 2022 McKinsey Global report). This involves constructing a completely new global grid, blanketing landscapes with stadium-sized wind and solar arrays. The global warming agenda is an ideology, driven in part by a misleading, fear-laced 2006 documentary by former US vice president, Al Gore. 'An Inconvenient Truth' has not stood the test of time, yet its purpose was achieved: to blame human society for an environmental collapse that hasn't happened. The movie gained widespread exposure, injecting deep cultural guilt into the drive to build today's worsening glut of turbines and solar arrays. In effect, it replaces dense and dependable hydrocarbon energy with mechanical gadgetry - systems that have proven to be intermittent and unreliable and subject to 20-to-25-year replacement cycles. The idea that human society is single-handedly overheating the world has its own dedicated core of followers. But no Western country sought the genuine backing of its citizenry via democratic consultation for this shift. The UN has led a relentless, top-down economic campaign, denouncing any doubts as 'science denial'.
7
19
42
1,220
There is no climate crisis. There is no climate crisis. There is no climate crisis. A deliberate, manufactured scam. 👇🏼
Earth is not facing urgent climate-related damage, despite claims embedded in the United Nations' 40-year grand plan. The real damage can be measured in global instability and widespread economic and industrial decline. The estimated price tag for this UN agenda is a staggering $275 trillion by 2050 (based on a 2022 McKinsey Global report). This involves constructing a completely new global grid, blanketing landscapes with stadium-sized wind and solar arrays. The global warming agenda is an ideology, driven in part by a misleading, fear-laced 2006 documentary by former US vice president, Al Gore. 'An Inconvenient Truth' has not stood the test of time, yet its purpose was achieved: to blame human society for an environmental collapse that hasn't happened. The movie gained widespread exposure, injecting deep cultural guilt into the drive to build today's worsening glut of turbines and solar arrays. In effect, it replaces dense and dependable hydrocarbon energy with mechanical gadgetry - systems that have proven to be intermittent and unreliable and subject to 20-to-25-year replacement cycles. The idea that human society is single-handedly overheating the world has its own dedicated core of followers. But no Western country sought the genuine backing of its citizenry via democratic consultation for this shift. The UN has led a relentless, top-down economic campaign, denouncing any doubts as 'science denial'.
2
6
65
Wing Ding retweeted
So, ready for another day of: The media, Labour, and left-wing rage-bait accounts teaming up to blame Tommy Robinson, Nigel Farage, Rupert Lowe, Elon Musk and the “far right” for “division and incitement.” All to distract from the real problem: mass migration and the damage it’s doing to our four nations?
11
42
236
4,207
Wing Ding retweeted
🚨 MY FELLOW AMERICAN PATRIOTS....we have 8 scalps. EIGHT pro-Hamas/domestic terrorists from the University of Michigan have been arrested and now have a 10 count indictment for targeting university leaders and businesses with violent threats and attacks. After the October 7 massacres by Hamas, a group of students led a campaign of violence, attempting to pressure University of Michigan leaders and other businesses to cut off all ties with Israel. They vandalized the victims' property and spray painted their homes with "Intifada" and "Free Palestine." They left threatening notes on doors, broke windows of the victims' homes, and threw jars filled with chemicals while children were inside. Zainab Aliasgar Hakim, 23, of Canton, MI Amatullah Aliasgar Hakim, 21, of Ann Arbor, MI Paige Elizabeth Feyock, 26, of Ann Arbor, MI Ahmet Kerem Korkaya, 28, of Milwaukee, WI Jonathan Hongru Zou, 22, of Ann Arbor, MI Alexander Matthew Sepulveda, 23, of Chicago, IL Mariam Muhammed Odeh, 24, of Dearborn, MI Colin Hunter Weger, 24, of Ann Arbor, MI Zainab Hakim and Paige Feyock are facing the most serious charges of witness intimidation, a 20-year felony. They threatened to kill an unnamed UM student in July 2024 in hopes of preventing the victim from informing a law enforcement officer about the campaign of threats. WELL DONE, FBI COUNTER-TERRORISTS!! One by one, we WILL defeat the enemy within. 🇺🇸🫡
INDICTMENT: Department of Justice indicts eight conspirators who threatened University of Michigan officials, businesses, and the Jewish Federation. According to the indictment, after the October 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attacks in Israel, the defendants and unindicted conspirators enacted a series of coordinated “actions” threatening University of Michigan leaders, law enforcement, and businesses. Seemingly prompted by their perception of the University of Michigan’s and other victims’ purported financial support of Israel, the conspirators insisted publicly that they “must escalate, mobilize, and organize to demand divestment by any means necessary.” Read more: justice.gov/usao-edmi/pr/dep…
241
2,572
6,256
68,553
Wing Ding retweeted
𝗦𝗶𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗮 𝗖𝗹𝘂𝗯 𝗙𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗭𝗼𝗻𝗲 (𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗼𝗿 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝘁❗) The Sierra Club thinks climate realists are winning the social media battle. That's why they launched "Climate Truth Tellers" to flood platforms with scripted alarmist comments. Volunteers receive daily instructions and sample posts to push their line. I signed up to see what they're actually feeding people. Read the full article: wattsupwiththat.com/2026/06/…
1
9
14
981
Wing Ding retweeted
Hier un ami m'a dit: "le UK, c'est fini." On me dit souvent la même chose de la France. "La France, c'est fini." Je comprends d'où vient ce sentiment. Les chiffres de l'immigration, la dette, les rues de Londres et de Paris, les institutions capturées. Le constat est largement exact. Mais la conclusion est une erreur. Et pas une petite erreur d'analyse. Une erreur mortifère. Voici pourquoi. Dire "le UK c'est fini" ou "la France c'est fini", ce n'est pas un diagnostic local. C'est une capitulation globale que vous n'avez pas encore avouée. Parce que le UK et la France ne sont pas des pays comme les autres. Ce sont deux des trois matrices de l'Occident. La common law, l'habeas corpus, le Parlement de Westminster. Les Lumières, les droits de l'homme, le Code civil. Si ces deux-là tombent définitivement, vous ne perdez pas deux pays. Vous perdez la preuve que le modèle fonctionne. Et le mécanisme est implacable: si le wokisme, qui n'est que le communisme après sa mutation des années 70, gagne en Europe, il ne s'arrête pas en Europe. Une idéologie qui a survécu à la chute de son propre empire ne s'arrête pas à une frontière. Elle a déjà traversé l'Atlantique une fois, en 1966, par Johns Hopkins. Elle retraversera dans l'autre sens. L'Occident tient ensemble ou tombe ensemble. Regardez la carte de ce qui est en jeu. Les États-Unis, le Canada, le Royaume-Uni, l'Irlande. La France, l'Allemagne, l'Italie, l'Espagne, le Portugal, le Benelux, la Suisse, l'Autriche. Les pays nordiques. La Pologne, les Baltes, la Tchéquie, toute cette Europe centrale qui a déjà payé pour savoir. Et les avant-postes: l'Australie, la Nouvelle-Zélande, le Japon, la Corée du Sud, Taïwan, Israël. Ce n'est pas une liste de pays. C'est une seule civilisation distribuée sur quatre continents. Abandonner un nœud, c'est affaiblir tout le réseau. Maintenant, le point que tout le monde oublie quand il désespère. Les plus grands d'entre nous ont désespéré aussi. Peter Thiel a raconté la scène dans son interview au New York Times. Un dîner avec Elon, pendant la campagne de 2024. Thiel lui dit: si Trump perd, je quitte le pays. Et Elon répond: "There's nowhere to go. There's nowhere to go." Il n'y a nulle part où aller. Thiel rentre chez lui et comprend deux heures plus tard ce qu'il vient d'entendre: Elon ne croyait plus en Mars. Plus comme projet politique. Parce qu'il avait compris que le gouvernement socialiste et l'IA woke le suivraient jusque sur Mars. L'homme qui construit des fusées pour fuir la Terre avait conclu que la fuite était impossible. Et qu'a-t-il fait de ce désespoir? Il n'a pas émigré. Il n'a pas abdiqué. Il a compris que puisqu'il n'y a nulle part où fuir, il n'y a qu'une option: se retourner et combattre. Ici. Maintenant. C'est exactement le bon raisonnement, et il vaut pour le UK et pour la France: il n'y a pas de sortie, donc il n'y a que la reconquête. Et la reconquête a déjà commencé. Ouvrez les yeux sur ce qui s'est passé en trois ans. L'idéologie qui semblait invincible en 2020 est en train de crever de partout. Les programmes DEI démantelés les uns après les autres dans les plus grandes entreprises américaines. Les universités forcées de rendre des comptes pour la première fois en cinquante ans. La censure qui régnait sur les réseaux, brisée. Les électorats occidentaux qui, élection après élection, rejettent le logiciel. Ce qui se vendait comme le sens de l'Histoire se révèle pour ce que c'était: une mode portée par la peur, et la peur a changé de camp. Et au centre de ce retournement, un fait sans précédent: l'homme le plus riche de l'histoire de l'humanité, en route pour devenir le premier trillionaire, a décidé de consacrer sa fortune, ses plateformes et ses machines à détruire cette idéologie. Pas à s'en accommoder. Pas à acheter la paix. À la détruire. Jamais, dans toute l'histoire de la guerre froide, le monde libre n'a eu un atout pareil. Les dissidents soviétiques écrivaient des samizdats à la machine à écrire. Nous, nous avons les fusées, les modèles d'IA et le réseau de distribution mondial de l'information entre les mains de gens qui ont choisi notre camp. Alors non, le UK n'est pas fini. La France n'est pas finie. Une nation n'est finie que le jour où ses bâtisseurs le décrètent, et le décréter, c'est précisément le but de guerre de l'adversaire. Le déclinisme n'est pas de la lucidité. C'est l'idéologie ennemie qui tourne dans votre propre tête, qui vous fait faire son travail gratuitement. Il n'y a jamais eu autant d'espoir pour le monde libre. Le vrai. Pas le mirage de 1989, quand nous avons célébré la victoire sur une adresse vide. Cette fois, nous savons où est l'ennemi, nous savons comment il fonctionne, et les hommes les plus capables de la planète sont enfin entrés dans la bataille. Le pessimisme est un luxe de spectateur. Nous ne sommes pas des spectateurs. Au travail.
222
924
2,766
352,688
Wing Ding retweeted
Las mujeres judías fueron atadas a árboles, con la boca tapada, mientras eran violadas y torturadas por Hamás, antes de ser ejecutadas o quemadas vivas. Las organizaciones de mujeres de todo el mundo guardaron silencio al respecto y aún lo hacen. Su silencio es ensordecedor.
220
2,488
4,948
38,041
Wing Ding retweeted
Dr Sin Hang Lee notes the presence of HPV DNA in Gardasil makes the vaccine far more immunogenic. @Merck was aware of this, and failed to publicly disclose it. High levels of HPV DNA fragments left over from the manufacturing process act as a second adjuvant—which has not been approved by any regulator worldwide.
7
122
329
14,061