Enjoying my sandwich

Joined March 2015
56 Photos and videos
$TNGX data positive readthrough for $ERAS
$ERAS if PRMT5i combo a hit, what prevents $ERAS from initiating a ph3 trial at the same time as $RVMD? What stops $BMS from picking up $ERAS and competing with $RVMD neck-to-neck? Scratching off all strategic value from $ERAS due to a 2yrs lag is ridiculous.
4
779
AT retweeted
$ARTV $300M offering priced at $11.52/share
1
3
3,219
$ARTV what's not to like?
$ARTV just had a late-breaking presentation posted for EULAR. Title bodes very well for outcome here in RA, etc. Likely why stock is moving:
3
708
AT retweeted
$ARTV just had a late-breaking presentation posted for EULAR. Title bodes very well for outcome here in RA, etc. Likely why stock is moving:
1
1
11
2,670
AT retweeted
May 5
“Show me a map of Israel before 1948” 🤔
237
1,389
7,023
247,881
AT retweeted
$ERAS $ANL $ERAS were idiots how they played this game. Should not have been dragged into $RVMD scenario and be reactive. Should have waited and released mature data. But to say that Big Pharma will just give up a $10-15B market and leave it all to $RVMD is ridicules. Saying "RVMD will get approved first and take the whole market" is plain stupid. Never happened before. There are many strategies Big Pharma can play with: first line, combinations..... There is no way, because there is just no way. that this market will be left to $RVMD to play in alone. And there are only two ways you can play this theme in public markets : $ANL or $ERAS. All in all I think $ANL is the winner from the late $RVMD - $ERAS debacle.
Putting criticism about timing and data presentation aside, $ERAS' ERAS-0015 seems very similar to $RVMD's daraxonrasib imo. ERAS-0015 is more potent which explains the lower exposure required for efficacy (and associated with on target toxicity of course). It might have a slight advantage on GI side effects (to be seen) but other than that it is likely to have a similar therapeutic index. If we compare just the PDAC data sets, $ERAS reported 4 PRs in 21 patients (~19% ORR) in the US at relevant doses which is lower than dara's 35% ORR but that gap will likely close with more follow up as $ERAS has multiple near PRs at the first scan than can convert in the future (They need 3 such conversions to reach 33% ORR). The limited follow up probably has a confounding effect on safety as well (longer treatment typically leads to more side effects) which should take $ERAS to a similar dose interruption/reduction rate in the future. Gr5 pneumonitis case requires attention but it could be an isolated case. Is $ERAS cheap at $3B? Not sure but for pharmas who cannot afford or simply won't get $RVMD this is the closest fast follower program that could be P3 ready later this year. *no position in stocks mentioned *
5
3
20
8,352
$ERAS if PRMT5i combo a hit, what prevents $ERAS from initiating a ph3 trial at the same time as $RVMD? What stops $BMS from picking up $ERAS and competing with $RVMD neck-to-neck? Scratching off all strategic value from $ERAS due to a 2yrs lag is ridiculous.
3
2
17
7,339
Also, patent disputes are typically settled in courts. Do you really think big-pharma well just sit on their hands while and let $RVMD have a $9B market (only in PDAC) just for themselves? $ERAS $ANL
1
1
3
840
100% agree. $ERAS got a beating that may have been well deserved given the the bloated valuation and hastened data report, but remains, along with $ANL, the only playable RAS names. $ANL much cheaper and with less of a patent overhang should pickup ahead of data.
Putting criticism about timing and data presentation aside, $ERAS' ERAS-0015 seems very similar to $RVMD's daraxonrasib imo. ERAS-0015 is more potent which explains the lower exposure required for efficacy (and associated with on target toxicity of course). It might have a slight advantage on GI side effects (to be seen) but other than that it is likely to have a similar therapeutic index. If we compare just the PDAC data sets, $ERAS reported 4 PRs in 21 patients (~19% ORR) in the US at relevant doses which is lower than dara's 35% ORR but that gap will likely close with more follow up as $ERAS has multiple near PRs at the first scan than can convert in the future (They need 3 such conversions to reach 33% ORR). The limited follow up probably has a confounding effect on safety as well (longer treatment typically leads to more side effects) which should take $ERAS to a similar dose interruption/reduction rate in the future. Gr5 pneumonitis case requires attention but it could be an isolated case. Is $ERAS cheap at $3B? Not sure but for pharmas who cannot afford or simply won't get $RVMD this is the closest fast follower program that could be P3 ready later this year. *no position in stocks mentioned *
10
14,162
AT retweeted
Putting criticism about timing and data presentation aside, $ERAS' ERAS-0015 seems very similar to $RVMD's daraxonrasib imo. ERAS-0015 is more potent which explains the lower exposure required for efficacy (and associated with on target toxicity of course). It might have a slight advantage on GI side effects (to be seen) but other than that it is likely to have a similar therapeutic index. If we compare just the PDAC data sets, $ERAS reported 4 PRs in 21 patients (~19% ORR) in the US at relevant doses which is lower than dara's 35% ORR but that gap will likely close with more follow up as $ERAS has multiple near PRs at the first scan than can convert in the future (They need 3 such conversions to reach 33% ORR). The limited follow up probably has a confounding effect on safety as well (longer treatment typically leads to more side effects) which should take $ERAS to a similar dose interruption/reduction rate in the future. Gr5 pneumonitis case requires attention but it could be an isolated case. Is $ERAS cheap at $3B? Not sure but for pharmas who cannot afford or simply won't get $RVMD this is the closest fast follower program that could be P3 ready later this year. *no position in stocks mentioned *
11
9
64
21,712
$ERAS re lawsuite, anyone who follows this space closely couldn't be surprised. I view it as an acknowledgement by $RVMD that ERAS is a threat, despite the lag. Re data, I think they have a good molecule on their hands. With RVMD @ $30B, what other way to play RAS? $ERAS $ANL
4
6
3,844
True, but most likely not a real signal given the context of the disease and history of the patient. Not a big deal IMHO. Overall tolerability profile is actually encouraging $ERAS
Replying to @Sanctuary_Bio
have to say really not a great look to not disclose a death in the PR and only mention it in slides. If there really is no correlation, what's the issue
1
2
1,572
So $ERAS got the letter from $RVMD on Friday and decided during the weekend to give a data update on Monday?
$ERAS pan-Ras data update this afternoon after market close. also, $RVMD sent Erasca a letter claiming ERAS-0015 violates certain RevMed patents. sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…
2
7
5,796
AT retweeted
Apr 22
2
8
1,300
$IDYA biggest takeaway from the call is mgmt noting early separation of OS curves with 10m of follow up
Replying to @JacobPlieth
$IDYA PFS curves from Optimum-02
1
1
15
6,527
AT retweeted
$IDYA PFS curves from Optimum-02
1
4
9
12,713
AT retweeted
$IDYA EV of $2B Will dominate Uveal Melanoma for years. $1-2B in Us plus royalties Ex-US. Massive pipeline.
2
16
1,913
AT retweeted
mPFS, HR, ORR as expected 5 CRs a nice suprise NDA 2H 26, new SOC for hla- $IDYA Balance sheet is strong. No competition, small # of docs - marketing cost shouldn't be exorbitant. Could book rev early '27 to fund rest of pipe. media.ideayabio.com/2026-04-…

1
2
15
18,275
$IDYA mUM market is theirs for the taking. Uptake will be fast.
$idya easy choice for patients, docs and payors. hr = 0.42💥💊 4x fewer g3 traes.
1
1
11
1,493
AT retweeted
The world is truly upside down! The Washington Post has published a brilliant article, written by, get this, a professor! To give you some flavor, here are a few choice lines by @jmurtazashvili: 1) "We are living through the first alt-war: a conflict in which the war fought online and the war fought in reality have diverged so completely that they might as well be happening on different planets. It’s not that people lack information, it’s more that they are constructing an entirely different alternate reality — one that confirms what they already believe." 2) "What worries me more than the fake videos are the people who cannot fathom that this war is going well for the United States, for Israel and maybe even for the long-suffering people of Iran. The strategic picture is more favorable than the online narrative suggests." 3) "Two weeks into the war, I watch otherwise reasonable analysts sprint to catastrophe. Former officials, thinktank scholars, credentialed professionals who are supposed to know how to read a conflict. Within days they had written the obituary: quagmire, overreach, disaster." 4) "The liberal internationalist left and the isolationist right — two camps that have agreed on almost nothing for decades — have suddenly found themselves in lockstep, racing to declare the war a failure before it had barely begun. This is the new blob: not the old foreign-policy establishment that the term originally described but a new amalgamation that has arrived at the same conclusion from opposite directions. Together they are the most powerful engine of the alt-war." The truth. In the mainstream media. By a professor. And written well. Four things I thought I'd never see again in my lifetime.
402
2,164
7,799
553,055