Scientist - Outcomes, measurement science, and cognitive neuro. END THE WAR in IRAN

Joined February 2012
628 Photos and videos
Pinned Tweet
Great resource - curated library of papers debunking antivax nonsense from @Debunk_the_Funk: zotero.org/groups/5006109/co…

19
9
23
12,499
Right winger @jimmy_dore helping us in the sciences understand what *real* evidence is all about! You can continue to my replies to see ACTUAL evidence about the COVID vaccines. What a joker this guy is - am I right?!?
Nice ratio, LOL! People with fake names on X are always the most reliable.
182
I literally showed in math that this isn’t true (see thread). What does an antivaxxer do? Refuse to engage the simple math (cowardice) and double down (stupidity)
1
11
425
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
All three are proven frauds. Ethical Skeptic manipulates fake graphs with hidden "adjustments" to falsify his claims. He's been objectively wrong on every claim he's ever made, without exception (nor can you show a single exception.) He also blocks anyone who challenges him or asks for his methodology. He's never once debated a single person live. EVER. I've offered him $100,000 for charity to replicate his findings worldwide but he refused. Dozens of countries around the world show no cancer signal. None of his work can be replicated ANYWHERE. Here are SOME receipts of Ethical Skeptic's fraudulent claims: sars2.net/ethical.html sars2.net/ethical2.html sars2.net/ethical3.html sars2.net/ethical4.html This is what happens when you ask @EthicalSkeptic questions about his methodology or say you cannot reproduce his plots 👇
13
30
135
4,801
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
Great progress in cancer 5yr survival rate for many cancers!
Cancer survival just crossed 70% in the U.S. It was 63% in the 90s. That gap = 4.8M people alive today. Myeloma: 32% → 62% Melanoma (metastatic): 16% → 35% Lung (metastatic): 2% → 10% That is not abstract progress. These are birthdays, grandkids, & years of memories restored. Sure, we have ways to go. But this is what funded science does. Next time someone asks if cancer research works, show them this chart. - - - - - Source: ACS Cancer Stats. 2026 SEER (via @Jori_health) - - - - -
6
21
77
3,794
This guy is GOING TO IRAN TO KICK SOME FUCKING ASS!!!! Well, ummm if there's a shortage of soldiers, and uhhh... and UNFORTUNATELY, that's not "how it goes"? 3rd Battalion, ChickenHawk Reg
Do you mean to fight against the fascist asshats who were running Iran under Ayatollah? If so, then yes, I would love to. Unfortunately, that's not how it goes. If it came down to it where the U.S. would need people to volunteer because there is a shortage of soldiers...... You're damn right. I'd be there to volunteer. I'm no chicken shit libtard. You got the wrong one.
70
I have reasons to beli be that @sjsmolick is an offender DM for more
Replying to @mjfree
What you just did is called defamation and it is a crime. This guy @BurgerLab12 would like to see the inside of a courtroom for defamation of a sitting president. @POTUS @FBI @FBIDirectorKash
1
46
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
Replying to @KUPERWASSERLAB
We can debate the causes (they are obviously multifactorial) but none of them involve vaccines. Cherry-picking data in one country that isn't replicated in every country is a failed endeavor.
5
3
35
5,340
Watching them cry because they're losing the war they started is priceless. (that two things can actually fit here tells you eveything you need to know about the R Party of 2026)
You’re an unconscionable liar, Obama. You just disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of voters.  Disgusting.
80
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
Replying to @TheChiefNerd
Ummm, Senator. They formally validated, acknowledged and added myocarditis to the vaccine labels I. June 2021. Is that how they “hid” it from the public? With publicly released discussions of the myocarditis safety data which was reported by the media, and then added to the vaccine labeling? Is that “hiding” to you, Senator?
9
9
117
1,583
It's all coming apart...
Trump's pick to head the CDC, Erica Schwartz, would likely be a disaster. Schwartz led nationwide Covid-19 vaccine deployment and her long track record of directly issuing rights-crushing civilian and military vaccine mandates, including mandating injection of smallpox, anthrax, and flu vaccines into U.S. Forces, and discipling those that refused, reflects she lacks the basic ethics and morals to lead the CDC. This agency does not need another cheerleader for industry; it needs a regulator over industry. Her prior promotion, let alone mandates, of nearly a dozen different vaccines leave little hope she will objectively oversee CDC’s vaccine program which has, between 1986 and the 2026, gone from 3 injections to 29 injections, including in utero, by an infant’s first birthday, while chronic childhood disease has gone from under 10% to over 40% of children, most related to immune system dysregulation. SOURCES: For examples of Schwartz mandating vaccines, see: media.defense.gov/2019/Feb/2… media.defense.gov/2019/Feb/1… dcms.uscg.mil/Portals/10/CG-… For increase in vaccine schedule, see: cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/i…; cdc.gov/vaccines-pregnancy/h… (perma.cc/DAX5-MKSW); cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-sch… (perma.cc/TM2U-2HBQ). The 29 injections in 2026 only include routine vaccines and the Covid-19 vaccine. Also see table on page 37 of Vacines, Amen. For rise in chronic health, see: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3944… (perma.cc/NGA9-93KW)(“According to data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) [1979-1981] over two million children under 17 years (3.8%) are afflicted by chronic conditions that cause some limitation of activ-ity.”); pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article… (perma.cc/KN4A-94TV) (“Data from the National Health Interview Survey indicate that the prevalence of activity-lim-iting chronic conditions among children under age 17 years doubled between 1960 and 1981, from 1.8 to 3.8 per cent.”); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9551… (perma.cc/JTZ5-JBNK) (Among “children younger than 18 years who were included in the 1992-1994 National Health Interview Survey … [a] significant proportion of children, estimated at 6.5% of all US children, experienced some degree of disability.”); cdc.gov/chronic-dis-ease/abo… (perma.cc/N4GT-38L2) (“Chronic diseases are defined broadly as conditions that last 1 year or more and require ongoing medical attention or limit activities of daily living or both.”); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2157… (perma.cc/62JZ-SRY4) (The 2007 National Survey of Children’s Health found that: “An estimated 43% of US children (32 million) currently have at least 1 of 20 chronic health conditions assessed, increasing to 54.1% when overweight, obesity, or being at risk for developmental delays are included.”); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4005… (perma.cc/3VHC-L7H2) (Only considering a “condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” or a “functional/ activity limitation related to a condition that is typically pediatric-onset and expected to be persistent or severe” from the National Health Interview Survey data it found that children falling into this category “has risen from 22.57% in 1999/2000 to 30.21% in 2017/2018”); https://www.cdc. gov/school-health-conditions/chronic-conditions/index.html (perma.cc/298V-C59B) (“In the United States, more than 40% of school-aged children and adolescents have at least one chronic health condition”); See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources. For relationship of chronic health issues to immune system dysregulation, see among other sources: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3074…; pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2884… (perma.cc/HZ8E-ETE5); pub-med.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/394… (perma.cc/BTM6-HFF8); pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article… (perma.cc/KZS3-5ERS); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3948… (perma.cc/H9QN-U2E7); pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/article… (perma.cc/LV9U-GQKE); pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3968… (perma.cc/LN7W-ZAX8). See Part IV of Vaccines, Amen for additional sources. cnn.com/2026/04/16/health/er…
108
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
@OkayThenNews — responding and then blocking isn’t exactly a strong look. You haven’t “proven me wrong,” Raphael. As I’ve said repeatedly, the central issue is your paper’s reliance on a fundamentally flawed structural argument: specifically a false trichotomy within an overall rough “proof by contradiction" argument. Your analysis limits the possible drivers of excess deaths to three categories: (a) COVID-19 infections, (b) lockdowns, and (c) COVID-19 vaccines. You then examine aggregated observational data (not even stratified by vaccination status) across a small number of Australian regions and argue that because (a) and (b) do not fully explain the observed excess, this suggests (c) must be involved. That inference does not follow. It overlooks numerous other plausible and well-documented contributors to excess mortality, so it does not establish vaccines as a causal factor. This was the core structural flaw I pointed out when the paper was released, and it remains one now. Below is a link to your paper so anyone can clearly see that this false trichtomy underlies the entire argument of the paper (and go ahead and run the paper through AI to see if AI reaches that conclusion). You continue to say you are not claiming “proof,” but that is inconsistent with how you present the work publicly. Your Substack posts and repeated social media commentary explicitly frame the paper as demonstrating that vaccines are a causal contributor to excess deaths, as providing "proof". While the paper itself uses more cautious language, your external messaging makes clear that you interpret it as proof and present it that way to your audience. Repeatedly. That disconnect is exactly why I keep raising this point (and, it seems, why you’ve now chosen to block me while continuing to reply to my point from behind the block so I can no longer respond). Pointing to a single cautiously worded sentence in the paper does not resolve this. Nor does invoking vague “government admissions,” which are neither clearly defined nor rigorously analyzed in the paper. As presented, they do not constitute evidence, let alone proof in the paper. This sentence certainly does not "prove me wrong" in my claim that your paper uses invalid scientific logic, and that you are framing your paper as providing "proof" of causal vaccine effects when in fact it clearly does not. Meanwhile, you continue to circulate the paper alongside strong causal claims that go well beyond what the analysis supports - and any reader of your posts or Substack would reasonably come away believing the paper provides such “proof.” At the end of the day, the argument in your paper rests on invalid inferential logic and does not demonstrate that vaccines are a causal driver of excess deaths. Repeating that claim, especially outside the paper, does not make it so.
6
7
51
2,349
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
1. This is not actual miscarriage and stillbirth data. 2. Actual comparisons of COVID-vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers show no difference in miscarriage and stillbirth risk. 3. There wasn't a recent bump in stillbirths and there's no indication of a bump in miscarriages.
Skyrocketed miscarriages and stillborns in 2021 It will take 50-100 years for the medical industry to earn back trust.
13
43
310
40,156
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
Dr. Trump performs a liposuction procedure on Randy Fine, saving his life.
102
857
8,943
131,912
Replying to @BoLoudon
Is that the same box Eric stole from those cancer kids?
320
7,424
15,471
203,294
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
35
421
5,576
89,744
Qanon is Jim Watkins retweeted
Replying to @Nockit1
Nicholas Hulscher. Baloney. He is so poor that anything he writes can be instantly discounted. The papers he references he misrepresents and obfuscated around. The others he authors are largely withdrawn. ***** Why do you want to see this so badly? Here is what did happen.
2
3
24
285
They spent 8 years calling Obama the N word- now this nonsense.
You can’t be American and stand against the President.
Community note
The First Amendment gives a constitutional right for Americans to stand against, criticize, and protest the President. It protects freedom of speech, assembly, and petition, allowing citizens to speak out, demonstrate, and demand changes without fear of government retribution. constitution.congress.gov/constitution/a…
1
50