TRAILER: New documentary from @WSJ on Great Barrington Declaration, Twitter Files, and Covid dissent! Full doc dropping next week.

The most widely used herbicide in US farming…Atrazine is an endocrine disruptor. It cause mammary tumors in animals: Cancer Sci. 2005 Jan 13;96(1):19–25. atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp… According to CDC/ATSDR.... “ Any atrazine that is washed from the soil into streams and other bodies of water will stay there for a long time, because breakdown of the chemical is slow in rivers and lakes. It will also persist for a long time in groundwater.” AND “ One of the primary ways that atrazine can affect your health is by altering the way that the reproductive system works. …An increased risk of developing mammary tumors was observed in female rats.”

I’m intrigued by the numbers for hem-malignancies as we noticed that from the case reports (oncotarget.com/article/28824…) but this is a very strong signal at the population level that needs to be verified and investigated with some urgency. @SenRonJohnson @KUPERWASSERLAB @Kevin_McKernan @DJSpeicher @RetsefL @NIHDirector_Jay @NCIDirector @RandPaul @HHSGov @US_FDA @kharaguchi @MaryanneDemasi @RWMaloneMD @JanciToxDoc @danaparish @xazalbert @JesslovesMJK @efenigson @Arightside @Fynnderella1 @Jikkyleaks @AaronSiriSG @RobertKennedyJr @TracyBethHoeg @statnews @TheCancerLetter

Important case of a 73 year old man with extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma at the injected left arm after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination 3 months earlier. The authors described 5 other cases with recurrence of T-cell lymphoma or newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) shortly after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination. link.springer.com/article/10…

Thank you @MaryanneDemasi "It's academic terrorism," says top cancer researcher blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/it… @SenRonJohnson @KUPERWASSERLAB @Kevin_McKernan @DJSpeicher @RetsefL @NIHDirector_Jay @NCIDirector @RandPaul @HHSGov @US_FDA @kharaguchi @MaryanneDemasi @RWMaloneMD @JanciToxDoc @danaparish @xazalbert @JesslovesMJK @efenigson @Arightside @Fynnderella1 @Jikkyleaks @AaronSiriSG @RobertKennedyJr @TracyBethHoeg @statnews @TheCancerLetter

I’m holding a hearing tomorrow at 2:30pm ET: “Plausible Mechanisms of COVID-19 Injections Causing Cancer and Attacks on Scientific Publications and Research.” We’ll hear from 6 doctors and a cancer survivor: - Angus Dalgleish, M.D. - @weldeiry - @SabinehazanMD, - Saskia Mostert, M.D., PH.D. - @DrAseemMalhotra - @jrgralow - Tamika Felder Tune in on my X account and find more information at the link below⬇️

🚨Senate hearing Wednesday, June 3, investigating link between COVID shots and cancer! 2:30PM Led by @SenRonJohnson 🙏

I’m excited to participate in the #PresCancerPanel meeting on June 8–9. This meeting will focus on modifiable risk factors for cancer & potential approaches to reduce cancer risk in the United States. Check it out: prescancerpanel.cancer.gov/r….

A terrific study that sheds important insights into Long Covid

🚨SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: Inside the FDA’s ‘cover-up’ over child deaths linked to Covid vaccines Insider accounts, leaked memos and Congressional scrutiny reveal what happened behind closed doors at the FDA blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/sp… @SenRonJohnson @SecKennedy @MartyMakary @Kevin_McKernan @VPrasadMDMPH @TracyBethHoeg

Seems like an important and relevant finding…. facs.org/media-center/press-… Primary paper here: journals.lww.com/journalacs/…

I get your point- I'm just pointing out that it is overly simplistic to keep pointing to crude population-level incidence trends which can obscure relationships because cancer is heterogeneous, latency is variable, exposures are uneven, and screening/diagnosis changes confound the signal. Some glaring examples of this include DES and clear-cell adenocarcinoma, asbestos and mesothelioma, radon and lung cancer. This last one is particularly relevant here because radon is known to cause lung cancer, but this signal is masked in population-level data since smoking is such a dominant risk factor and radon exposure varies dramatically by geography and by household...

That’s not my argument. I’m not saying every cancer trend since 2020 should be attributed to COVID or COVID vaccination. I’m saying the absence of a clean, population-wide “hockey stick” across all cancers is not evidence that there is no biologically meaningful signal. Cancer is not one disease. It is hundreds of diseases with different etiologies, latency periods, tissue susceptibilities, immune dependencies, exposure histories, and host vulnerabilities. If a signal exists, it would likely appear unevenly — in particular cancer types, in particular populations, and against already-moving background trends. The right question is not: “Did every cancer rise everywhere after 2020?” It is are there biologically plausible, cancer-type-specific, age-specific, sex-specific, or immune-related patterns that warrant closer investigation? And in the Norway data for several cancers — including pancreatic, stomach, NHL, and leukemia in women — I don’t think the trends look reassuring. Some predate COVID, which makes them no less important. It may point to broader environmental, infectious exposures or immune-related pressures that we should be studying more carefully, not dismissing as “good news.” And for the US under 50 data - those trends look even more worrisome.

💯🎯Based on their actions one would think that the FDA believes their job is to protect a public-health narrative, not to protect the public. And it has been more than 6 years since the rollout of these products and we still do not any guidance or regulation on their manufacturing ...

This response/solution is “whack-a-mole”. The platform was designed to induce immunity. But biology responded in an unpredictable way...vaccine protein produced by liver cells activated pathways that suppressed CD8 T-cell responses. So rather than viewing this as a potential intrinsic limitation of systemic mRNA-LNP delivery, the proposed solution is to further engineer the platform to bypass or silence the biology responsible for constraining it. In other words, each newly discovered biological barrier becomes the next target for engineering intervention.... Shouldn't we pause for a moment and be raising the broader question of whether these are isolated obstacles, or signals of deeper platform-level incompatibilities??