EMERALD-1, EMERALD-3, CARES-005, LEAP-012, (and maybe Imbrave 050, although for post-resection or ablation; and EMERALD-Y90 for post-Y90) all test a similar idea: will adjuvant systemic therapy improve outcomes after local regional therapy? PFS benefits are seen across all studies (except 050). But OS are all immature. Are we just giving systemic therapy earlier for these patients who would eventually have more advanced disease? Without final OS, post-TACE systemic therapy is probably not given universally as of today. Hopefully we will have the data soon.
But for some high risk patients, there might be benefits. We need to investigate who in the control arm “have no chance” to receive systemic therapy upon progression. Those are the patients we want to consider treating earlier.
And the debates continue…
@GABOUALFA PhIII EMERALD-3 trial of TACE durva/treme len (Arm A) vs TACE STRIDE (B) vs TACE (C) in
#HCC not amenable to
#LRT ➡️ median PFS 13.0 vs 9.8 mos & OS 39.5 vs 34.7 mos (HR 0.84, 40% mature) (Arm A vs C), equivalency for Arm A vs B outcomes no
#ASCO26 @OncoAlert