Researching South Carolina’s institutions, giving my opinions, ready to show receipts. SC state offices & schools are infested with "woke" policies & DEI.

Joined October 2024
61 Photos and videos
Replying to @ABCNews4
1/ The UofSC College of Nursing (CON), including its dean, Jeannette Andrews, who is quoted in this article, has intentionally infused the nursing program with social justice and DEI, according to her own words. Andrews is co-author of a 2021 paper with UofSC nursing faculty describing the overhaul of the CON to expose nursing students to a curriculum that focuses on social justice and DEI through social determinants of health (SDOH). SDOH are, everything and anything that impacts health, like transportation, housing, microaggressions, nutrition, pollution, racism, voting access, etc. It puts health departments, like SC DPH, in a powerful, centralized role for implementing global policies across our social sectors, funded by taxpayers.
1
3
5
830
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Restoring a healthy sense of American identity for Americans and leading them to feel justly proud of who we are in our 250th is one of the most important projects we could be doing right now. It's not just the younger generations either, even if it is them especially.
My generation has ZERO understanding of our American identity, because it was drummed into our heads that the builders before us are oppressive colonizers so the entire thing apparently must be torn down. 
25
132
610
12,864
Sadly, when I think about libraries today, it's connected to progressive programs for kids or drag queen story hour or when I find library or literacy groups linked to other progressive activist groups (allyship for political agendas). Librarian graduates have a rep as being among the most woke. My primary concern is that state-funded "literacy" programs through our libraries may involve critical literacy, culturally relevant pedagogy, DEI, youth activism, etc., or that it is subtly pushed via the book selections and discussion. It's worth investigating how much tax money goes to these programs. It's certain that greater oversight must take place where citizens' dollars are involved.
I recently asked our county library this question — only 1/5 households have used the library in the last year — yet we’re all forced to fund it via property taxes. Libraries are now basically a jobs program for lefties & a de facto government contract for left-wing authors. Oh & then they sell the books that they purchase with your tax $ to the non government “Friends of the Library” who turn around and lobby for more of your tax $. Half of the materials are online now & yet they still keep building new libraries. DOGE!!
3
5
205
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Hopefully, all these videos of Brits seeing the awesomeness of America will have the same effect on the UK as Boris Yeltsin's visit to an American grocery store in 1991 had on the poor, suffering people of the Soviet Union.
They Love America
4
11
680
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Communists and Democratic Socialists want every school to become a Community School. Community Schools are marketed like the new envy in school transformation. But, it's a bait and switch. cpusa.org/party_voices/the-c… Join @JillSimonian and I as we discuss: youtu.be/DBIhQ-6-GVo?si=3pde…
1
8
13
575
SC conservatives, can we bottle this media style, even a weak-tea brew version, and expose progressives & RINOs running our state? What say you, independent media researchers? Show us what you've got!
Saving LA - Phase III
1
24
SC-5 Democrat Mallory Dittmer is still bragging in a May 2026 campaign clip (on FB) about her group’s fight against @Moms4Liberty. Now running for US Congress on the same progressive education agenda as detailed in this 🧵by @scccontechforum
Replying to @SC_RedLine
CAPE was started purely to take down @Moms4Liberty York County, the largest and most active chapter in the state. Don’t worried, we survived. 😎
1
60
Conservatives in SC-5: Meet Mallory Dittmer, the Dem challenging Republican Wes Climer for US Congress. She campaigns as a moderate unifier who’ll “de-politicize education” but her leadership in York Co’s Community Advocates for Public Education pushed DEI, school gender policies (facilities/sports/records), & more federal influence. @scccontechforum Thread 👇on why it matters.
@dittmerforsc loves to talk about "de-politicizing education", but that is misleading marketing from her. Let's revisit some of the advocacy she's done. #scpol
2
1
278
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Why did @henrymcmaster recently appoint Ruth A. Hodges to the South Carolina State Library Board?? Another liberal Democrat! Dr. Hodges is a Dean at historically black college South Carolina State University-- where the 4-year graduate rate is 21%!! Only 36% of students graduate w/i 8 years!!! This same college CANCELLED @PamelaEvette commencement speech after pressure from their BLM-mob students. In fact, Hodges was appointed to the state library board within a DAY of the speech cancellation! Are we really supposed to believe Evette is going to make-good on her promise to defund SCSU when her own administration just appointed one of their deans to an important state board!?
15
41
125
7,313
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Jun 11
I’m a numbers guy and Tuesdays GOP primary led me down some rabbit holes. Here’s the wildest statistic I’ve discovered thus far. South Carolina’s total population growth last year was 79,958. Fastest growth rate in America. Our natural population growth (births minus deaths) was plus 564. Wild eyed southern boys and their better halves native to South Carolina ain’t having anywhere near enough babies to keep the state I love “southern”. Not even close. As the great philosophic poet Bob Dylan proclaimed, “the times they are a-changin”.
32
33
181
31,743
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
After the SFFA v. Harvard decision, many universities indicated they would try to find ways around it. UC Davis Med, which had already developed a way to get around California’s affirmative action ban, went further, offering to teach other schools how to do it. Post-SFFA, the architect of their “Davis Scale,” which uses socioeconomic factors to admit racially diverse classes, “was asked about being sued over his legally questionable methods. He replied, ‘Am I worried about it? Yes. Is it going to stop me? No.’”
“Documents provided by Davis Med show that its leadership openly boasted about ‘skirting’ the Supreme Court's ruling by using certain class-based ‘socioeconomic variables’ or ‘disadvantages’ as proxies for race.”
12
67
311
40,822
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
“Norman supporters are also hardcore, movement conservatives – meaning they are highly likely to return to the polls in two weeks time if one of the surviving candidates speaks to their issues (i.e. judicial reform, term limits and cracking down on corruption in state politics).” My issue is the sexualization of children — SC has a major pedo problem and yet we’re funding pornographic library books for KIDS and no one will enforce the law! Call it a niche issue — it’s about CULTURE We’ve got to start pushing back on what the left is doing to kids!
🐘🌴🌙🗳️ The 80,724 supporters of @RalphNorman will be among the most coveted potential voters in the June 23, 2026 runoff between @PamelaEvette and @AGAlanWilson. Looks like Norman isn't going to try and tell them who they should vote for... #Crossroads2026 fitsnews.com/2026/06/11/cros…
6
5
40
3,160
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
@CivilRights finds UC Davis Med School’s deliberate use of race “proxies” in admissions illegal & shocking. Despite lower average GPA & MCAT scores, black or Hispanic admission rates were 2-9x higher than whites or Asians. Future doctors must be chosen based on skill, not race! justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-d…
156
1,078
3,786
114,534
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Thank you to everyone who has already tuned in! Here's the new link to my full interview with @JillSimonian of @prageru: youtu.be/DBIhQ-6-GVo?si=3pde…
1
10
25
4,958
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Moms, Dads, Grandparents, Community Leaders, and Concerned Citizens, We need to schedule meetings with our elected representatives in Washington D.C. to inform them and urge them to remove their support. I'll join you.
WHYYY is the Republican-majority house appropriations committee trying to make school safety grants a codified funding stream for woke wellness programs and the mental health industrial complex to turn schools into mental health clinics that overdiagnose kids 😭😭😓😓🥴🥴
2
6
11
729
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Jun 10
Colorado has embraced the Community School model—surrounding kids with government services (food, mental health, etc) from birth to adulthood. Schools replace parents. @kellyske will explain the Community School agenda to @prageru TODAY. Watch and learn ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Don't miss this important interview tomorrow! I joined @JillSimonian of @prageru to discuss the Full-Service Community School agenda. Set your notification to livestream tomorrow at 10:30am PT, 1:30pm ET 👇 youtube.com/watch?v=P4FZQ7xp…
6
23
53
2,021
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
My Dearest Darlings, The @TheJusticeDept Office of Legal Counsel has issued an opinion arguing that EEOC’s Title VII disparate-impact guidelines are unconstitutional. The U.S. DOJ opines that disparate-impact liability under Title VII is unconstitutional. If courts ultimately accept that argument, it could become one of the most significant developments in federal employment-discrimination law in decades. For more than fifty years, courts and Congress have recognized two distinct theories of discrimination: disparate treatment, which involves intentional discrimination, and disparate impact, which can impose liability when a facially neutral employment practice produces significant statistical disparities among protected groups and is not justified by business necessity. The Department argues that disparate-impact liability creates constitutional concerns because it pressures employers to consider race and other protected characteristics when making employment decisions. The opinion is one step forward to reaffirm a color-blind, merit-based understanding of civil-rights law. The Department of Justice has advanced a constitutional argument, but courts have not yet adopted it. Existing disparate-impact law remains in effect unless and until Congress or the judiciary says otherwise. America cannot restore equal opportunity while government and employers are pressured to chase demographic outcomes. The path forward is not more DEI bureaucracy, racial balancing, or ideological compliance. The path forward is equal protection, individual merit, and equality under the law for all. We must end #DEI discrimination and protect equal opportunity.
There’s a new weapon in the fight against DEI: an important DOJ opinion on “disparate impact.” The decision strengthens the case for color-blind, merit-based employment decisions and directly challenges the regulatory machinery behind much of modern DEI practices. It’s just the first step toward restoring equal opportunity before the law, but it’s an important step!
3
4
698
There’s a new weapon in the fight against DEI: an important DOJ opinion on “disparate impact.” The decision strengthens the case for color-blind, merit-based employment decisions and directly challenges the regulatory machinery behind much of modern DEI practices. It’s just the first step toward restoring equal opportunity before the law, but it’s an important step!
🔥Hot off the presses: @TheJusticeDept issued an opinion today explaining that disparate-impact liability under federal employment law is *unconstitutional*. This is an earthquake in federal civil rights law. If right, this is the foundation to overturn that pernicious regime.
1
2
7
716
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
Don't miss this important interview tomorrow! I joined @JillSimonian of @prageru to discuss the Full-Service Community School agenda. Set your notification to livestream tomorrow at 10:30am PT, 1:30pm ET 👇 youtube.com/watch?v=P4FZQ7xp…
6
32
74
13,484
South Carolina Red Line retweeted
1/ Alabama got serious about ending DEI, "CRT," "woke" at Auburn University. Concerned South Carolina legislators working with grassroots should press for this, starting with the University of South Carolina, because it won't take place through state ed offices, the universities themselves, and state leadership: On June 5, 2026, Auburn University’s Board of Trustees took ultimate control over curriculum, course offerings, syllabi, and credentials while dissolving the Faculty Senate.
Auburn Board Takes Full Curricular Control, Dissolves Faculty Senate The Auburn University Board of Trustees on Friday gave itself complete control over course offerings, curriculum, degree requirements and academic credentials while eliminating shared... bit.ly/4fqcUEZ
2
4
9
483
1/The man pledging transparency is Kevin Guskiewicz, the direct beneficiary of a secret process. He's a DEI champion now safely ensconced at Clemson, in an alleged "red state." But he’s going to be transparent? While at MSU, Guskiewicz claims to have met with legislators to defend his university DEI policies and “enlist them for help on messaging around the [DEI] issue amid the Trump administration's hostility toward the programs.” “messaging around…” Does this sound like a man committed to transparency? Or does it sound like someone skilled in circumventing it?
Clemson used a secret process to hire Kevin Guskiewicz, releasing a list of finalists only after it named its next president. That doesn’t just lock out the public; it also postandcourier.com/opinion/e…
3
5
7
2,766
3/ Guskiewicz won’t face many hurdles. SC has no comprehensive anti-CRT/strong DEI ban in universities, no permanent standalone law fully prohibiting DEI offices, mandatory trainings, or progressive curricula in public higher ed (unlike some red states). Budget provisos curb some activity. Conservatives propose many bills, but with limited success in stopping 'woke.' Federal law blocks some funding, but rebranding is a proven workaround that has allowed continued funding in many cases.
1
1
1
183
4/ Only citizens have the power to demand that action is taken against universities bent on instilling progressive ideology in our students, the next generation of voters. We can't expect change without grassroots pressure. Without it, we can expect more of the same.
1
47