Biomarker intelligence company launches Terra platform as wellness brands face growing pressure to prove real health outcomes. vist.ly/56pfn #longevity #biomarkers #ai #wellness #healthoutcomes @InsideTracker

I've been getting bloodwork 3-6 times a year since 2014. I have 51 panels going back twelve years. I spent a decade at InsideTracker, the main innovator when it comes to blood analytics. And I still didn't notice that my ferritin craters every summer. The data was never the issue. Having something that could hold all of it in working memory at the same time was. I wrote about what happened when I pulled 12 years of Strava, 51 blood panels, and my full training log into Claude and asked it to tell me what was interesting. Here's the short version: IRON My ferritin craters every summer and I never noticed. Moving to Colorado dropped my average ferritin 19% permanently. Altitude forces your body to make more red blood cells, and that process drains your iron stores as a structural tax whether you're training hard or not. My best performances cluster around my highest ferritin readings. My worst effort ever; Four Pass Loop, no power on any climb; was ferritin 45, Tsat 19%. My marathon PR of 2:59 was run with ferritin 17 points below my career average. I don't know what I left on that course. INJURY Most predictable trigger across 8 years: a travel-related volume drop followed by a full return to normal load with no adjustment. 50 mile week → 18 mile week → back to 50. Something breaks every time. October and January are my highest injury months. The fix: never exceed 1.25x your 4-week average after a down week, no matter how good you feel. SAUNA 331 sessions logged since 2018. Weeks with 2 sessions correlate with a 36% lower injury signal the following week. When already dealing with something, sauna weeks resolve 35% faster. My best fitness years had the most sauna. I'm currently at 3.6% of days and my hip is flaring. Not a coincidence. FITNESS VO2max 63.3 at sea level. LT2 at 6:19/mi. Both tested September 2025. Controlled HR at 142 bpm while training at 5,280 feet. I'm probably in the best aerobic shape of my life and haven't had the right race to prove it. RUNNING PARTNERS Pulled pace and subjective feel scores across every logged run, classified by partner. Two people consistently get me to 7:44–7:49/mi on what should be easy runs; highest feel scores in the dataset. Running is measurably better when you're not doing it alone. WEATHER 0.27 seconds per mile slower per degree Fahrenheit on road runs. Below 45°F I average 8:24/mi. Above 75°F it's 8:50/mi. November is my fastest month. June is my slowest. All of this is the easy part. Pattern matching is becoming a commodity. The hard part is what happens next; someone accountable who can examine you, order the follow-up test, and adjust the plan when your labs come back. That's what I wrote about this week, and it's what @Eternal is built to be: longrunlabs.substack.com/p/w…

Relevant for the future of longevity & wellness branding. @hubermanlab @PeterAttiaMD @DaveAsprey @WHOOP @insideTracker @AG1 @eight_sleep @Huel

Talk 6: Dr. @gblander1 giving us an introduction to @InsideTracker

Want to boost your #iron levels but stick to a plant-based diet? Here are 9 options. Optimal iron is key for energy & performance, and many plants are packed with it. Your body will thank you for adding these to your meals. #VeganNutrition #HealthyLifestyle #InsideTracker

Never using @InsideTracker again, turns out their overpriced tests have an expiration date if you don't use them.

David Sinclair 这期播客最颠覆的一点：衰老不是端粒缩短或自由基，而是表观遗传层面的信息丢失。DNA 是光盘，epigenome 是被刮花的读盘机器，细胞忘了自己该是谁，于是开始老化。 可执行的抗衰工具集，按 ROI 排序： 1）间歇性禁食。他本人 22/2 进食窗口，新手从 16/8 起步，3 周适应再推进。机制是同时压低胰岛素、激活自噬、抑制 mTOR。最便宜也最有效。 2）力量训练 冷暴露。轻度压力（hormesis）是长寿燃料，比一直舒服更抗衰。他不天天冰浴，但常年穿少一点睡凉一点。 3）补剂栈（仅他自己方案，不是处方）：NMN 1g/天 白藜芦醇 1g/天，早晨空腹与橄榄油同服；二甲双胍早晨服，运动日跳过。逻辑是补 NAD、激活 sirtuins、模拟低能量。 4）盯三个指标：CRP（炎症）、铁蛋白（偏低更好，必要时献血）、生物年龄（用 InsideTracker 跟踪，目标逐年回拉）。 最关键的认知升级：衰老是可干预的疾病，不是必然规律。Sinclair 实验室已经用基因疗法让盲鼠复明，未来几年一颗"重置丸"做全身回调，人体试验先从治失明开始。 今天能做的最高 ROI 动作不是猛吃 NMN，而是把吃饭窗口先收到 16/8。 youtube.com/watch?v=n9IxomBu…

.@InsideTracker Study Links Platform to Improved Biomarkers ~ athletechnews.com/insidetrac… via @athletechnews #wellness

InsideTracker charges $589 per year. Function Health has a 100,000-person waitlist. Levels requires $200/month plus hardware. ChatGPT gives you hallucinated interpretations with no tracking. $SOMAGRAPH exists because biological age intelligence should not cost more than a blood test itself. Under $5. Global access. Peer-reviewed math. The empty quadrant nobody filled until now.

Why Do You Consistently Feel Off Despite Healthy Habits ●Sleep is fine, but not truly restorative ● Workouts feel harder than before ●It’s not discipline—it’s biology tycoonstory.com/why-do-you-c… #whydoyoufeeloff #healthyhabits @InsideTracker @eightsleep

2026 TABS presents you an exciting afternoon of internationally recognized scientists and leaders - including @altos_labs , @BlueRockTx , @MDIBL , @UofT , @InsideTracker , @Continuum_VC , @deepsciventures , and @creativedlab Sign-Up (Free) May 14: forms.gle/YFUooUgAvcBZ2Rxr5

Dus wat heb ik dan ontworpen met behulp van alle AI agents? Het eerste echt bruikbare biometrische gezondheidsplatform dat er is en dit is waarom (technisch): 1drv.ms/p/c/6ec2571873c2747f… Je kunt het zelf proberen op l-gevity.nl/stream.html Het platform is volledig functioneel en het is zo makkelijk als: inloggen, bovenaan beginnen, aanwijzingen volgen, onderaan fit. Dit was niet een kwestie van wat vibe coding of AI prompting, ik heb zelf een nieuwe architectuur en biologisch model moeten bedenken om de problemen die de standaard health platforms (InsideTracker, Apple Health enz.) hebben op te lossen. De meeste credits gingen op aan deep research van de onderliggende wetenschap en wiskunde, en aan de continuous refactoring. Voor de developers, hier de meta-skills die ik heb geschreven om het project onder controle hielden, kunnen jullie zo gebruiken in je eigen projecten! github.com/l-gevity/l-gevity… Zouden in principe in elk DevOps project toepasbaar moeten zijn.

On n'a pas gagné le hackathon Alan × Mistral.Mais en 8h avec Orchestria, Signa ton companion santé qui connecte tes bilans sanguins, tes données wearable, et une IA vocale. Tout est live 👇 signa.ropau.fr/ (je vous laisse tabassé mes credits mistral qu'on a eu) 🩸 OCR intelligent Upload une photo ou un PDF de ton bilan sanguin → Mistral OCR 3 extrait chaque biomarqueur automatiquement. Zéro saisie manuelle. 📊 Dashboard santé unifiéHealth Score Bio Age (PhenoAge, Levine & Horvath 2018). Deux KPIs héros avec count-up animé. Ta santé en un coup d'œil. 🔬 Explorer, 11 biomarqueurs trackésLDL, HDL, Triglycérides, hs-CRP, Glycémie, HbA1c, Ferritine, Vitamine D, TSH, Cortisol, Testostérone. Zone bars style InsideTracker. Projection de tendance en pointillés. ⚡ Cross-signals, la feature qui tueL'IA croise tes données labo wearable et détecte des patterns qu'aucun médecin ne verrait en 15 min de consultation : → Cortisol ↑ HRV ↓ = stress chronique → Ferritine ↓ sommeil profond ↓ = carence en fer → Glucose stable activité ↑ = métabolisme qui répond 🎙️ Assistant vocal IA Pose une question à voix haute. Voxtral STT → Mistral Small 4 (avec TOUT ton contexte santé) → Voxtral TTS. L'IA te répond avec TA data, pas des réponses génériques. 📁 Coffre-fort documentsBilans sanguins, consultations, imagerie, ordonnances. Filtres par type et période. Chaque document est cliquable avec sa data extraite. 🔔 Centre de notificationsTimeline d'alertes intelligentes : cross-signals détectés, tendances wearable, rappels d'upload, recommandations partenaires Alan (Livi, Petit Bambou, Alan Clinic). ✨ Motion design chirurgicalFade-in-blur sur les textes IA. Cascade séquencée sur les cards. Count-up sur les KPIs. Zone bars qui se remplissent. Bottom drawer avec spring. Chaque pixel est animé avec intention. 🏗️ Stack100% Mistral (OCR 3 Small 4 Voxtral STT/TTS). Next.js 15 React 19 Tailwind v4 Supabase Vercel. Thryve API pour les wearables.

You have two ages. The one on your birthday cake, and the one your cells are actually running at. A $500 finger-prick test can now tell you the second one. And when people find out their cells are older than they are, they start doing something about it. Dr. Sinclair’s point is about behavior. People see the number and change what they do. The best controlled study on this put 43 healthy men on an 8-week program: leafy greens, liver, eggs, seeds, moderate exercise, breathing exercises for stress, and probiotics. Researchers from McGill University and the National University of Natural Medicine published it in the journal Aging in 2021. They measured each person’s cellular age before and after using an algorithm called the Horvath clock, which reads chemical patterns on DNA to estimate how old your body really is. The treatment group came back 3.23 years younger than controls, and a blood fat tied to heart disease dropped 25%. Nobody popped a pill or got an injection. The whole program was food, sleep, and movement, and it cost nothing. 43 people is small. 178 over a full year, which is what Sinclair is referencing, starts to mean something. Apple is building the technology to track this from your wrist. In October 2025, they published a Nature Communications study using 213,593 Apple Watch wearers across 149 million days of tracking. They trained an aging clock off the light sensor that reads blood flow through your skin. Men aged 45 to 55 whose watches said they were aging faster had 2.1 times the diabetes rate of the men aging slowest. Same birthdays. Very different bodies. Doctors who push back have a point, because none of these consumer tests are FDA-approved for diagnosing anything. The FDA doesn’t even classify aging as a disease. And the AMA’s ethics journal flagged in December 2025 that getting a report saying “your cells are 8 years older than you” can mess with people, especially when there’s no doctor in the loop explaining what the number means. Sinclair has skin in the game here too, as co-founder of Life Biosciences and a past podcast sponsor of InsideTracker, one of the testing companies. The evidence keeps building though. Researchers at the University of Michigan tracked 3,500 older Americans and found in a 2023 paper that people aging faster at the cellular level were more likely to develop chronic diseases within 2 years and to die within 4. The biological age testing market hit roughly $18 billion in 2025, growing around 15% a year. TruDiagnostic, the biggest private testing company in this space, runs 30 clinical studies with Harvard, Duke, and Yale. The lifestyle changes that shaved 3 years off cellular age in the 2021 trial cost nothing. The test that measured it cost $500.

🧬 長寿専門家が推奨する「老化を遅らせる5つの食品」 ■ 全体のポイント 老化のメカニズム: 細胞レベルで起こる複雑なプロセス（ミトコンドリア機能不全、炎症、DNA損傷、細胞老化、テロメア短縮など）を指します。🔬 鍵となる要素: 生化学者Dr. Rhonda Patrick氏らの知見に基づき、「炎症の抑制」が老化を遅らせる重要な鍵であると強調されています。🔑 基本のアプローチ: 果物、野菜、全粒穀物、健康的な脂肪、痩せたタンパク質を中心とした食事を推奨。血液検査（特に葉酸とhsCRP）による自身の状態把握も推奨されています。🩸 ■ 老化を遅らせるベスト5食品と効果 1. ブロッコリースプラウト 🥦 科学的根拠: 成熟ブロッコリーの50〜100倍のスルフォラファンを含有。NRF2経路を活性化し、抗酸化・抗炎症・デトックスを促進。 メリット: ミトコンドリアの保護、毒素除去、がん・心血管系のリスク低減。 目安: 毎日約100g。※普通のブロッコリーにマスタードシードを加える方法も有効。 2. ザクロ 🍑 科学的根拠: 腸内細菌がエラグ酸からウロリチンAを生成し、マイトファジー（ミトコンドリアの更新）を促進。 メリット: 寿命延長（線虫）や筋肉機能向上（齧歯類）の研究結果あり。人間でもミトコンドリア機能改善や肌の老化防止に効果的。 目安: 果実やジュースを週に数回。 3. ホウレンソウ 🥬 科学的根拠: 葉酸が豊富で、テロメアの保護とDNA損傷の防止に寄与。 メリット: テロメア短縮を遅らせ、老化関連疾患のリスクを低減。ミトコンドリアの健康を維持。 目安: 調理済みで半カップ程度。血液検査でのモニタリングを推奨。 4. ストロベリー 🍓 科学的根拠: フィセチンが豊富。老化細胞を除去する「セノリティック」効果があり、酸化ストレスと炎症を軽減。 メリット: 動物研究において健康寿命の延長が示唆されている。 目安: 毎日半カップ、または週に複数回。 5. キノコ 🍄 科学的根拠: 強力な抗酸化物質グルタチオンと、通称「長寿ビタミン」のL-エルゴチオネインの最高供給源。 メリット: 細胞保護、デトックス支援、脳の健康維持（アルツハイマーやパーキンソン病予防）。 目安: 毎日5個程度。 ■ 結論 これらの食品に「魔法の弾丸」はありませんが、日常的に取り入れることで細胞レベルの健康をサポートし、健康寿命を延ばす可能性があります。個人の栄養状態に合わせた、血液データに基づくパーソナライズドなアプローチの活用が推奨されています。 🔗ソース: 5 Best Foods to Slow Aging, According to Leading Longevity Experts (InsideTracker 2024年5月27日公開) insidetracker.com/a/articles… InsideTracker記事を基に要約 ※詳細は元記事をご確認ください。

So how do you actually test your biological age? 3 leading options: → TruDiagnostic (TruAge): Scans 900,000 DNA sites. Uses DunedinPACE Harvard's OMICmAge algorithm. Shows organ-by-organ aging for brain, heart, liver, etc. → InsideTracker: Blood-based. Tracks 13-17 biomarkers tied to aging. More affordable entry point. → Elysium (Index): Saliva-based. Uses the Horvath and PhenoAge clocks.

$300M to Function too; now they're hyping healthy smoothies. I had a poor experience (albeit back in 2024) where it told me nothing new (granted I'd been doing tests with InsideTracker for a decade), and was a false flag to go speak with my doctor on something that wasn't actually an issue.

Most companies try to sell everyone. We turn people away. Not because we are precious. Because fit determines outcomes. RHA is a high-performance medical practice. We provide coordinated, physician-led care for people committed to optimizing their health—not just treating illness. This model works exceptionally well for the right people. It fails for the wrong ones. So let me tell you upfront who should NOT join: If you are looking for the cheapest option—we are not it. Our annual membership is $6,970 plus diagnostics. If that creates financial stress, the timing is not right. Function Health offers excellent lab testing for $499/year. Wild Health provides physician-led care for $2,400/year. Both are legitimate options. If you only want lab data—you do not need us. Function Health and InsideTracker provide comprehensive biomarker testing without the physician relationship. We would be overcharging you for services you do not want. If you only want hormones—there are specialists who do it better. Marek Health is the category leader for TRT/HRT protocols. If hormone optimization is your sole goal, they are more focused and less expensive. If you want a magic pill—that is not what we do. We provide protocols, coordination, and accountability. But you have to execute. If you are looking for someone to "fix" you without lifestyle changes, keep your current doctor. If you will not follow through—we would rather you succeed somewhere else. Our outcomes depend on member execution. We will coach you, hold you accountable, adjust protocols. But we cannot do the work for you. Why am I telling you this? Three reasons: First, your money matters. $7,000 is a significant investment. If there is a better option for your specific needs, you should know about it. Second, fit determines outcomes. Our best results come from members who match our model. Mismatched members get frustrated, and we cannot deliver what we promise. Third, we have limited capacity. Our physicians maintain small panels to provide unlimited access. We literally cannot serve everyone, so we prioritize people we can actually help. So who IS this for? You might be ready to graduate from self-managed health if: You are already tracking—but nothing is integrated. Labs in one app, wearables in another, training logs somewhere else. You are the one reconciling conflicting data. You have multiple advisors who do not talk to each other. Doctor here, trainer there, maybe a nutritionist. Each gives advice in isolation. You are the project manager of your own health. You are spending significant time interpreting data instead of acting on it. The research, the second-guessing, the optimization—it has become a part-time job. You want optimization AND medical oversight. You are pushing beyond standard care—hormones, metabolics, longevity interventions—and you want a physician who actually understands what you are trying to do. Maggie Andrews described this exactly: "Rebel Health meets you where you are at and their staff is committed to your progress and goals. Some people are fit as a fiddle and want to dial in their longevity even more... The team at Rebel Health will set the stage and support you to hit goals and maintain them. The only unknown is if YOU can match their commitment to change and success. The only unknown is if YOU can match their commitment." That is the graduation question. PO came to us already healthy by conventional standards: "I was already in excellent health by today's norms and benefitted none from our acute-focused healthcare system. Thus I was looking for novel approach to healthcare built on data and geared for peak wellness. I found that with RHA." He was not broken. He was ready to hand off the coordination. Dave put it this way after a year with us: "I do not have many medical problems, but for the small issues that I have had, the team has been very helpful. They provide guidance and then follow up with labs to verify and check results, making modifications as needed. They are not simply relying on 'feel.' I am healthier than I have been as an adult. Not simply relying on feel." That is what changes when you graduate from DIY to coordinated care. You stop guessing. You stop being the integrator. You get a team. The decision is simple: If managing your health has become overhead instead of leverage—if it is competing with your actual life and work—it might be time to hand it off. If you are still enjoying the process and have bandwidth for it, stay in DIY mode. There is no shame in Phase 2. But if you are ready for Phase 3—coordinated delegation with a physician-led team running the system—we should talk. We would rather have the right 500 members than the wrong 5,000. If you think you are one of the 500, book a discovery call. We will tell you honestly if we are the right fit—or recommend an alternative if we are not. [SEE IF YOU QUALIFY - LINK IN NEXT TWEET] John Founder, Rebel Health Alliance P.S. — If you join and realize within 30 days that we are not the right fit, we refund your membership. No questions, no friction. We are that confident about fit mattering more than volume.