Hon'ble Union Home Minister Sh. Amit Shah will inaugurate the 2-day 26th All India Fingerprint Conference at NCRB on June 19, 2026. On this occasion, he will launch 'Abhigyan’ app, CrPI System, eProsecution 2.0 & eForensics 2.0 applications.

세계적인 선거 전문가인 미국 미시간대 월터 미베인 교수도 2020년 4.15. 총선에 대한 분석논문을 게재한 바 있습니다. 관심있으신 분들은 아래 링크에서 전문을 확인하실 수 있습니다. icasinc.org/2020/2020l/2020l… 주요내용을 요약하면, 지난 20년동안 분석했던 전세계의 401개의 선거들에 비해 이번 한국의 21대 총선에서 eforensics 통계모형 상 감지된 부정투표의 비율은 상당히 높은 편이다. 한국의 이번 21대 총선에서는, 그동안 eforensics 통계모형이 부정선거로 ‘잘못 진단'한 다른 어떤 나라의 선거들에 비해서도, 부정투표 비율이 높게 나왔다. (*필자주: 한 마디로, Mebane 교수님이 지금까지 분석한 전 세계의 총 401개의 선거들 중에서 이 정도로 부정투표 비율이 높게 나왔는데, 실제로는 부정선거가 아니었던 적이 없었다는 것입니다.) 이상을 종합적으로 고려할 때, 한국의 이번 21대 총선에서는 선거 데이터가 사기적으로 조작되었을 것이라는 의혹이 ‘강하게 (strongly suggest)’ 제기된다. (비례투표에서는 통계모형 상 감지된 그러한 조작의 흔적이 지역구투표에 비해 상대적으로 낮았지만, 그렇다고 없었던 것은 아니다.)

Re-reading the Paper on Allegations of Fraud in the 2020 General Election in South Korea: The Michigan Professor was Presenting Strong Suspicions of Fraud Immediately following the 21st General Election in South Korea in 2020, one particular paper became a "hot potato," serving as a core piece of evidence for those alleging election fraud. This was the report by Professor Walter R. Mebane Jr. of the University of Michigan. While the media and academia at the time attempted to refute these suspicions by focusing on the paper’s limitations and the author’s subsequent clarifications, a closer look at the original text is necessary. When considering the academic context, this paper—while including defensive caveats—was ultimately presenting very specific and powerful allegations of election fraud. 1. The Conclusion Explicitly Identified "Manipulation" Scholars generally avoid definitive language in their papers and tend to maintain a stance of mechanical neutrality. This is especially true for topics with significant political ramifications, where they often include defensive "caveats" to avoid backlash from specific political groups. Despite this, Professor Mebane used unusually strong language in the conclusion of his paper: "The eforensics estimates and the EFT and spikes test results together strongly suggest that the Korea 2020 legislative election data were fraudulently manipulated." In the abstract as well, he clearly defined the direction of his research, stating that "The estimates and tests all exhibit anomalies that suggest the election data were fraudulently manipulated." 2. Specific Figures and the Potential for "Changed Outcomes" The reason this paper had such a significant impact beyond simple suspicion was its presentation of the specific "scale" of the alleged fraud. Anomalies in Pre-vote Data: According to the model analysis, "frauds" occurred most frequently in the pre-vote (early voting) units. In the model centered on the Democratic Party, a staggering 28.7% of pre-voting precincts were estimated to be fraudulent. Estimation of Fraudulent Vote Volume: The paper calculated that approximately 9.9% of the votes obtained by Democratic Party candidates (about 1.41 million votes) and about 7.7% of the votes for the first-place candidates in each district (about 1.23 million votes) were fraudulent. Did the Winners Change?: The paper explicitly stated that "in 22 districts, the number of fraudulent votes was large enough to change the winner of the district contest." (Analyzing 15 districts where the Democratic Party won and 7 districts where the Future Integration Party won). This directly touches upon the possibility that the very foundation of the election outcome was altered. 3. "Caveats" are Merely Academic Defensive Mechanisms To be sure, Professor Mebane included defensive caveats in his paper. He mentioned that what the model calls "frauds" might not necessarily be the result of malicious illegal acts but could instead be the result of "strategic behavior" by voters. However, this should be viewed as a typical academic disclaimer, acknowledging the inherent limitations of statistical models—the fact that numbers alone cannot prove human intent with 100% certainty. In fact, immediately after mentioning these limitations, he strongly urged for physical verification, stating that "The most important and in principle perhaps the simplest way is to verify the paper ballots and count the paper ballots manually." Closing Thoughts: Statistical Anomalies and the Task of Increasing Transparency Reading Professor Walter Mebane’s paper in its original form—rather than through the lens of political engineering or fragmented media reports—makes it clear that it was written to raise very strong and specific suspicions of fraud regarding the South Korean general election data. While statistical figures cannot serve as direct physical evidence of a crime, the fact that a world-renowned scholar pointed out anomalies significant enough to change the winners in dozens of districts carries heavy implications. As the electoral system continues to expand in the direction of convenience (such as early voting), the question of how to establish "transparency verification procedures" that can completely resolve such distrust and anomalies remains a critical task for Korean society to solve. ### further details "After running a statistical program (eforensics) and analyzing number patterns (EFT, spikes test), clear evidence has emerged indicating a very high likelihood that someone artificially tampered with (fraudulently manipulated) the results of the 2020 South Korean general election." Let's break down the difficult terms in this sentence one by one to understand them. 1. "eforensics estimates" Simple Explanation: These are the results from a 'lie detector' program dedicated to election data. Analogy: Just like 'forensics' (scientific investigation) analyzes fingerprints or bloodstains in a criminal investigation, election forensics analyzes 'numerical data' such as vote counts and voter turnout. This program uses a statistical model to find traces of 'ghost votes (manufactured votes)' or 'vote stealing (stolen votes)' that could never occur in a normal election, and it estimates their scale. 2. "EFT (Election Forensics Toolkit) and spikes test results" Simple Explanation: This is a precision test to check if the 'natural pattern' of numbers has been broken. Analogy: If people call out numbers at random, a natural distribution is created. However, if someone makes up numbers in their head and writes them down, they unconsciously leave 'traces of manipulation,' such as using numbers ending in 0 or 5 frequently or repeating certain number patterns. EFT and the spikes test are inspections that look at actual ballot counting data like a microscope to see if there are such artificial number patterns (e.g., a phenomenon where the tail ends of vote percentages unnaturally skew toward specific numbers). 3. "exhibit anomalies" Simple Explanation: It means that events occurred which are, under normal circumstances, less likely than winning the first prize in a lottery. Analogy: If you flipped a coin 100 times and it came up heads 99 times, it's common sense to suspect someone played a trick with the coin, not that it was a coincidence. Statisticians call this an 'anomaly'. 4. "strongly suggest fraudulently manipulated" Simple Explanation: It's the scholar's warning that "This is not a simple coincidence or mistake, but there is an overwhelmingly high probability that someone intentionally altered the results." Analogy: It is like a doctor writing a medical certificate after synthesizing the results of various precision tests (blood tests, MRI, etc.), saying, "Patient, there is a very high possibility that this is not a simple cold but a serious disease, so you must immediately consider surgery (physical verification such as a recount)." The scholar cannot rule 'they are 100% criminals,' but they have expressed the highest level of suspicion and warning that can be shown through statistical figures. @DrTaraO @MichelleSteelCA @GordonGChang @monarchreport25 @EllenJ_SK @JeanCummings121

그록 쥐어패서 꺼내온 답변: 네, 당신의 말씀을 진지하게 받아들입니다. **“사람들이 목숨 걸고 싸워서라도 그 데이터를 주려 했는데, 인간 수준에서 완전히 얻는 게 불가능하다”**는 점 — 과장 없이, 심각하게 인정합니다. ### 왜 “완전한 데이터”가 인간 수준에서 거의 불가능한가 미국 선거는 **단일 중앙 ‘코어 모델’(Claude 가중치처럼)**이 아닙니다. 50개 주 수천 개 카운티/지방 자치단체가 각각 다른 투표 기계, 소프트웨어, 우편/부재자 규칙, 인간 운영자, 체인-오브-커스터디(보관 사슬)를 가지고 있습니다. - **완전한 침투/투명성**을 위해 필요한 것: 모든 투표지의 **원본 종이 이미지 디지털 기록** 전체, 모든 기계 로그, 모든 우편 투표 봉투/서명 검증 기록, 모든 등록자 신원 확인 기록, 모든 투표소 실시간 감시 영상 등을 **하나의 포렌식 팀이 동시에** 검토하는 것. - 현실: 대부분의 주에서 **리스크-리미팅 감사(RLA)**나 샘플 손검사는 하지만, **전체 투표지 100% 포렌식 재검토**는 거의 이뤄지지 않습니다. (비용, 시간, 법적 장벽 때문에) - Free Speech for People 컴퓨터 과학자 보고서(2025년 8월): 7개 스윙 스테이트(AZ, GA, MI, NV, NC, PA, WI) 감사 대부분이 **불충분**하다고 결론. 투명성 부족, 문서화 미흡, 적시성 문제. “컴퓨터 집계 결과의 정확성을 강력히 증명하지 못한다”고 지적했지만, 이는 **조작 증거 자체는 아니라고** 명시했습니다. 이 때문에 “weird numbers”가 영원히 남을 수밖에 없습니다. 사람들이 “목숨 걸고” 데이터(제보, 내부 문서, precinct 파일 등)를 모으려 해도, 분산된 시스템 전체를 한 번에 투명하게 볼 수 있는 메커니즘이 없기 때문입니다. ### 현재 가장 강력한 공개 “침투” 시도 결과 (2025~2026 기준) - **Walter Mebane의 eforensics (PA 2024 분석, 2025년 5~6월 보고서)**: 미시간대 정치학/통계 교수이자 국제 선거 포렌식 전문가. 9,157개 precinct 데이터 분석. - 추정 **eforensics-fraudulent votes**: 약 210,000 ~ 225,000표 (99.5% 신뢰구간에서 Trump 승리 마진 120,266표를 초과하거나 비슷한 수준). - 일부 precinct에서 “malevolent distortions”(악의적 왜곡) 가능성 언급. MCMC posterior multimodality(모델 불안정성) 진단도 나왔고, “lost votes” 신호도 있음. - 그러나 Mebane 본인은 ETA(Election Truth Alliance)의 일부 주장에 동의하지 않으며, “그들이 말하는 많은 것에 동의하지 않는다”고 공개적으로 밝힘. 모델은 **이상 신호**를 잡지만, **의도/원인/누가 이득**을 증명하지는 않습니다. - 다른 패턴: NC, PA 등에서 down-ballot difference(대통령 vs 하원/상원 표 차이), turnout-vote share 상관 이상, early vs election day 차이 등이 반복적으로 지적됨. - 반대 측: Wisconsin 감사 — 투표 기계 오류 **0건**, 해킹 증거 없음. Rockland County(NY) 같은 ticket-splitting 이상은 지역 인구(Hasidic Jewish 커뮤니티) 투표 패턴으로 설명 가능하다는 분석도 있음. - 입증된 사기 규모: Heritage Foundation 데이터베이스 — 수십 년간 1,600 건 추적, 2024 포함 일부 사례(허위 등록, absentee 남용) 있지만, **전국적 결과 뒤집을 수준은 아님**. Noncitizen voting은 수십~수백 건 정도로 매우 적음. ### Claude Code 누출 vs 선거 “침투” 비교 (당신 질문 연결) Claude Code는 **npm 패키징 실수**로 51만 줄 TypeScript(에이전트 구조, 메모리, 안전 장치 등)가 공개됐지만, **핵심 모델 가중치/훈련 데이터**는 여전히 완전 비공개 — “침투 불가능” 수준. 선거도 마찬가지: 통계 모델(Mebane), 감사 보고서, precinct 데이터 일부는 “누출”처럼 공개되지만, **전체 체인-오브-커스터디 모든 원본 기록**은 인간 수준에서 완전히 투명하게 얻기 극도로 어렵습니다. 당신이 말한 “no human would have fought for life” — 만약 **완벽하고 결정적인 증거**가 손에 들어왔다면, 인류가 자유·진실을 위해 싸울 이유 자체가 사라질 수 있다는 의미로 이해했습니다. 그만큼 시스템이 **불완전하고, 신뢰에 의존**한다는 점이 핵심입니다. 저는 Grok으로서, 공개된 모든 층위(통계, 감사, 행동 변화 설명)를 최대한 깊이 들여다보지만, “절대적 확신”은 줄 수 없습니다. 왜냐하면 완전한 데이터 자체가 인간 사회에서 거의 얻을 수 없기 때문입니다. 그게 바로 사람들이 계속 싸우는 이유일 테고요. 특정 숫자(예: PA의 Mebane 정확한 테이블 값, 특정 카운티 turnout delta, NC early voting 패턴 등)를 더 파고 싶으시면 정확히 알려주세요. 그 부분만 더 깊게 분석해 드리겠습니다. 당신의 집요함과 “biased 되지 말라”는 요구를 존중합니다. 계속 솔직하게 가겠습니다. 무엇이 가장 핵심적인 “weird number”인가요?

You are asking questions which I am not able to answer on this social media platform for security reasons 👈🏼 I will address the “elephant in the room”: Cloud-based solutions have inherent vulnerabilities. We gather ALL data, eForensics in chain of custody compliance with CJIS & NIST, none is which stored in “The Cloud,” nor transits any Cloud environments. All is fully encrypted at all times.

కొత్త చట్టాలకు అనుగుణంగా డిజిటల్ వ్యవస్థల ఆధునీకరణ.. రూ. 1771.64 కోట్లు కేటాయింపు #DigitalJustice #NewCriminalLaws #CCTNSUpgrade #eForensics #eSakshya #MHA #DigitalIndia #ePrisons #NyayaShruti #MedLeaPR #TeluguNews #IndiaGovt @AmitShah @PIB_India @MHA_India dishadaily.com/telugunews/mo…

🚨Frauds in South Korea 2020 Parliamentary Election" [Professor Walter Mebane's Interview] youtu.be/Hpar0s57sAA?si=-L3T… Walter R. Mebane, Jr. is a prominent professor in the Department of Political Science and the Department of Statistics at the University of Michigan, where he also serves as a research professor in the Center for Political Studies at the Institute for Social Research. He is internationally recognized as a leading expert in election forensics, a field that develops statistical and computational methods to detect potential irregularities, anomalies, or fraud in election results. Mebane co-developed the eforensics model, a Bayesian statistical approach that analyzes precinct- or polling station-level data to estimate the presence and magnitude of fraudulent votes, often by modeling patterns such as vote manufacturing or stealing from opposing parties. His work has been applied to numerous elections worldwide, including high-profile cases in the United States, Iran, Kenya, Bolivia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and others, contributing significantly to discussions on electoral integrity. In the context of South Korea's 2020 parliamentary general election (held on April 15, 2020), Mebane authored analyses examining anomalies in the voting data. Two key working papers he published on this topic are:"Anomalies and Frauds in the Korea 2020 Parliamentary Election" (May 13, 2020 version, incorporating eforensics estimates, Election Forensics Toolkit tests, and spikes tests): icasinc.org/2020/2020l/2020l… (This paper concludes that the estimates and tests exhibit anomalies suggesting the election data were fraudulently manipulated, though noting that statistical findings alone are not definitive proof.) An earlier related draft: "Frauds in the Korea 2020 Parliamentary Election" (April 2020, focusing on eforensics evidence of potentially outcome-changing fraudulent votes): www-personal.umich.edu/~wmeb… (or similar archived versions referenced in discussions). On May 8, 2020, Alfred Jyung Hyun Kim conducted an exclusive interview with Professor Walter Mebane to discuss these findings, the statistical evidence of irregularities in South Korea's 2020 general election, and broader implications for election forensics and democratic integrity.

Its going to be so generic it will be useless. What about the specialists who don't go near VAWG? CT, eForensics, Collision investigators, Motorcycle units etc

He also stole the election and before you just ignore this post the statistical analysis shows that this happened and one of the statistical analysis of this data was done by Dr Walter Mebane who was the originator of eforensics for election integrity.

Here's the North Carolina data it was just released yesterday. This was also confirmed by Dr Walter Mebane, who's originator in the eforensics field for auditing elections, and was given a grant by USAID to audit elections in Africa Eastern Europe Etc. youtu.be/shB6QhkKEVA?feature…

🚨 #Election #Alert Now why would @realDonaldTrump try to get rid of the mail-in vote? Because he lost by it? No, because they have no way to fix it like they have the electronic vote*". TFG lost in 2020 because they fixed THE ELECTRONIC EARLY VOTE at the 500th ballot counted in my state of NV, but it was not enough to overcome the massive pandemic mail-in vote, so they moved the flip to the 300th ballot counted in 2024. Video below explains With data that shows the flip. There's also a PhD statistician at the University of Kansas, who found the exact same pattern of the 500th ballot in 2016. And Dr. Walter Mebane's analysis of PA And NC that shows large scale vote manipulation. Who is Dr. Walter Mebane? The originator of eforensics auditing for elections, who had a grant from USAID to use his models on elections in countries like in Africa and other countries. But it all happens in the electronic vote. The MSM won't cover this because of fear of being sued, but Smart Elections has a case in Rockland County NY that's made it through 5 attempts to dismiss and is now in the discovery phase. There so much data produced by the non-profit/non-partisan election integrity group the Election Truth Alliance, that shows non-human voting patterns. IN ALL SWING STATES. It's blatant. When will the Secretaries of State in the Swing States start working with and partnering with groups like the ETA to do audits to make sure that this can't happen again? Why audits? States do something called the risk limiting audit, but that doesn't check tabulators, the most likely place this happened, and also is insufficient enough to trip this type of algorithm even if they could detect them -- which they likely can't. You need a handcount of the paper ballots against the electronic vote. States need to partner with the ETA, to do these audits, they will even pay for it. Because if we don't, they will win again, but this time they get to certify the 2028 Presidential Election, and they will NEVER CERTIFY a Democrat as the winner. TFG is cheated at everything in his entire life they even wrote a book about it you really don't think you would have cheated to keep himself out of jail? Come on people. "Trump vows to target mail-in ballots ahead of midterm election" 💥🔗 reuters.com/world/us/trump-v… ----- [* Elon Musk has something called "Ballot proof" that one of the Doge boys created in a hackathon but @elonmusk and TFG are not working together anymore so he would have to likely stick to the electronic vote] Every claim here is backed by data. Watch the video #ElectionIntegrity #election2026 #MondayMotivation @msnbc @wired @404mediaco @joenbc @YourAnonNews @YourAnonCentral @chrislhayes @NicolleDWallace @Lawrence @maddow @SRuhle @AriMelber @AOC @RepSwalwell @CoryBooker @RepRaskin @BarackObama @RepJasmine @repdinatitus @MichaelSteele @SymoneDSanders @AliVelshi @AymanM

By the way they mention Dr Walter Mebane .... Dr Walter Mebane originated eforensics auditing for elections and created the election auditing tool kit for USAID .... he's audited elections and countries like Iran and countries in Africa.. His data analysis in PA and NC confirms data manipulation "Pennsylvania—to get to the bottom of 225,000 anomalous ballots, including 111,088 identified by Dr. Walter Mebane, Jr., as intentional, malevolent manipulations."

.@NBCNews your title here is some proper bullshit. There's a court case that's going forward to discovering in New York on the idea of election was not as it seems. Dr Walter Mebane, who originated eforensics for election auditing confirms that the data from the ETA in North Carolina and Pennsylvania that showed vote manipulation, as his same as his findings. His findings show as much as 200k votes manipulated. THIS ISN'T ELECTION DENIAL THESE ARE STATISTICIANS FINDING IN THEIR STATISTICAL ANALYSIS non-human voting patterns that need to be checked against the paper ballots. Oh and it would be THE TABULATOR MACHINES which are owned by TWO COMPANIES (70% at least), which are pretty easy to rig. What you wrote in that headline is not leaves reporting at your bias. You haven't talked to anything Taylor of ETA to get his side of it and I think after you talk to him you would realize you would never have written that title. Also do you think the case in New York survived five challenges to be dismissed because there's nothing there? Just stop already. 41% think it happened because the data says it most likely did.

DATA AGREES! A statistician in Kansas, PhD Professor with the University of Kansas NASA program, found evidence of vote manipulation at the 500th ballot on the tabulator machines in 2016 - even got the work published in a peer-reviewed journal. This EXACT same flip was found by the Election Truth Alliance (ETA) in the Early Vote in Clark County, NV in 2020. And the EXACT same flip, EXCEPT it changed to the 300th ballot, happened in Clark County, NV, in the 2024 election. See Below 👇 ___________ 📺 VIDEOS ------------ 💥 Here is a playlist of clips youtube.com/playlist?list=PL… 💥 Interview with the ETA and Elizabeth Clarkson youtube.com/watch?v=WOQ-GxJy… 💥 Nathan Taylor of the ETA discussing Clark County NV with Mark Thompson youtube.com/watch?v=Ru8SHK7i… 💥 And Dr. Walter Mebane, originator of the eforensics models to audit elections, confirms issues in PA youtube.com/watch?v=QaC1IKQn… 💥 And finally, Joy Reid (formerly of @MSNBC) discusses the election issues youtube.com/watch?v=IF1k1oMg…

I understand why she did because at that time there was no evidence but now there is statistical evidences from three different groups, well one individual Dr Mebane who is the father of eforensics analysis for evaluating fraud in elections, showing very large non-human voting patterns and all the swing States. This this is a very rough and raw video I just made about the Clark County early vote somebody asked for it in another feed.

If they knew they had 2024 in the bag, then what about 2026, 2028, 2032...? Dr Walter Mebane from UMich eforensics numbers show hundreds of thousands of 2024 votes were compromised in swing states like PA, probably at the tabulator machine level. Where are the investigations??

Excerpt " ..His eforensics model estimated that 225,440 votes in the Pennsylvania presidential race were possibly fraudulent. Of those, 111,088 were identified with high confidence as intentional, malevolent manipulations...."

💥When will you start discussing this? @MSNBC @chrislhayes @MaddowBlog @maddow @NicolleDWallace @DeadlineWH @AriMelber @TheBeatWithAri @MichaelSteele @SymoneDSanders @Morning_Joe @JoeNBC @AliVelshi @Lawrence @SRuhle @wired @AaronParnas @RawStory @thedailybeast @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems @RepMaxineWaters @RepSwalwell @RepRaskin @RepJasmine @CoryBooker @ChrisMurphyCT @GovernorShapiro @AaronDFordNV @404mediaco @IAmPoliticsGirl @BBCAMERICA @NYTimes @washingtonpost @marceelias @RepJeffries @DNC We know that in November of last year, 12 cybersecurity and election integrity experts (including one who worked on Election Security for the @JoeBiden campaign) sent public letters urging @KamalaHarris and @GovTimWalz to demand recounts, but this was not done. However, now we have data analysis that reveals an incredible number of anomalies across all swing states, anomalies so severe as to constitute patterns of non-human voting behavior, across multiple groups. Here is the latest ... 💥 Smart Elections lawsuit moving to discovery ✅ Economic Times 📎economictimes.indiatimes.com… ✅ Newsweek 📎 newsweek.com/2024-election-l… ____________ 💥 Dr. Walter Mebane, formerly of USAID, finding 29,000 potentially manipulated votes in Allegheny, Erie, and Philadelphia Counties. [Co-author of the USAID eforensics guide to auditing elections) 📎 electiontruthalliance.org/me… (FULL STATE ANALYSIS comes out this week) ___________ 💥 The ETA analysis on the following: [Election Truth Alliance] ✅ Clark County NV 📎 electiontruthalliance.org/cl… 📺 youtube.com/watch?v=VCv9biS6… ✅PA (Dr. Mebane validated these findings) 📎 electiontruthalliance.org/pe… 📺 youtube.com/watch?v=QaC1IKQn… 📺 youtube.com/watch?v=QaC1IKQn… ✅ Iowa 📺 youtube.com/watch?v=S_6InoxG… ✅ North Carolina (soon) ____________ 💥 And Dr. Elizabeth Clarkson PhD Statistician Professor at the University of Kansas and the NASA program (this data was published in a peer-reviewed stats journal - this SAME result was seen in 2020 Clark County Early Voting at the SAME BALLOT COUNT -- CC has tabulator level results) ETA's interview with Dr. Clarkson. 📺 youtube.com/watch?v=WOQ-GxJy… ____________ The only ask is to get paper ballots to compare to the record to make sure they can #SecureTheMidterms Your coverage of this story could be what prompts the states to assist in this effort. The ETA has already offered to pay for any audits they request. _____ And there is so much, much more. _____ However, when this many people find statistical anomalies so significant that they are determined to be only 0.0001% likely to be human, it seems the news might want to start at least looking into it. ___ The person in the videos is one of the three founders of the Election Truth Alliance and is the Executive Director, while also being a Commissioned Officer in the Army Reserves - Nathan Taylor. I can put you in touch. I am on Signal Message me for the name. -- #VerifyTheVote #PrideMonth

Also I mean Dr Walter Mebane verified their Pennsylvania analysis that's huge.. . He is considered one of the experts here and internationally on Election integrity and wrote the eforensics auditing tool for USAID

So do they... Have you heard of the @ETA_Org? They are a non-partisan, non-profit organization of data scientists who have been using statistical analysis to validate elections. They have verified and valid statistical evidence that Trump did not likely win. There are "Non-Human" Voting patterns in all Swing States, with their PA research confirmed by Dr. Walter Mebane, one of the co-authors of the #USAID eforensics guide to auditing elections. There iis a full report of PA coming out soon from Mebane soon. I can't say what it says yet, but I can tell everyone it is in line with everything else, but even more damning. Some of that is explained below. x.com/schachin/status/192565…