The implications of Shannon's work do indeed continue to reverberate but it is somewhat misleading to ascribe the implications for basic science our daily lives to his genius alone. Rather the implications are due to delicate synergies.
It is Shannon's work in synergistic combination with Turing's, von Neumann's, Jaynes', Hofstader's, Gell-Mann's, Hopfield's, Hartle's, Wheeler's and many others that provides the foundations for the science of information, computation and emergence that is just beginning to flourish.
And it is places like Bell Labs (traditionally) The Santa Institute that in providing a "common now"—to channel Jim—facilitate the collision of minds and ideas that allow this instrumental synergy to grow.
The concepts of synergy higher order interactions—and our ability to formalize them—is itself an outcome of these collisions.
What is the character of institutions, of policies, of our collaborations that allows synergies to flourish? What is the nature of environments that crush synergies? The key to enriching the present future lies in no small part on this understanding what we *choose* do with it.
In one single groundbreaking paper, Claude Shannon laid the foundation for the entire communication infrastructure underlying the modern information age.
quantamagazine.org/how-claud…