Last night at the @HouseofCommons JENGbA launched #Abolish Child Life Sentences to a packed room. Hosted by @KimJohnsonMP with great speakers. The blanket on the wall was a sombre reminder how children DIE in diabolical circumstances in #prison @Channel4News @BBCNews

It's pretty damned obvious that it's not possible for a defendant to mount any form of adequate legal defence against offences they are not charged with. Please RT this until this injustice is corrected. Thank you.

There are lots of people on here drinking the security services Kool Aid over the sentencing of the Filton Four. They believe the judge was right to overturn the jury's decision to convict four anti-genocide activists of criminal damage and make it a terrorism offence instead, overturning centuries of legal precedent. Why? Because, they claim, the four activists broke / smashed / shattered a police woman's spine. But that obviously can't be the explanation because three of the activists had nothing to do with that incident and yet they were convicted as terrorists by the judge anyway. Even Samuel Corner, the activist who was convicted over this incident (which left the police woman with a minor fracture, according to the medical authorities who testified), shouldn't have been sentenced as a terrorist for it because that is not what the jury, which heard the actual evidence, decided. The jury convicted Samuel Corner of grievous bodily harm *without intent*. The prosecution had charged him with GBH *with intent* because they needed that as his conviction to build a public mood in support of the proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. If Corner could be presented as having entered Israel's Elbit weapons factory with intent to commit violence, then the implication would be that the other activists were in on that plan – a conspiracy – and the government would be off the hook of violating fundamental legal norms by proscribing Palestine Action. By stripping out intent, the jury pulled the rug from under the government's feet. Judge Johnson's task was put the rug firmly back in place by riding roughshod over the jury's decision and sentencing them as terrorists anyway. The timing couldn't be more convenient. On Monday, the Appeal Court will be deciding on the government's appeal against the High Court declaring its proscription of Palestine Action unlawful. If you're peddling the "But they smashed the back of a police woman" line you've been fed by the Daily Mail and BBC, it's because that is exactly what the government needs you spouting as it upends our age-old rights to jury trials, as it stamps out an honourable tradition of direct action dating back to the Suffragettes and before, and as it gives itself cover for continuing complicity in a genocide. Stop being a cuck. Don't fall for this psy-op.

Sentenced and imprisoned on grounds of “terrorism” that no jury ever convicted them of. Meanwhile, the British government continues to aid and abet the greatest crime of our time. A historic miscarriage of justice — and a truly dark day for civil liberties in this country.

Turned out the Epstein files are full of billionaires and trillionaires, not immigrants.

Suleiman Obeid, known as the “Pelé of Palestine,” was killed by an Israeli tank while standing in line trying to secure food for his five children.

There exists a permanent political class in the UK. If they're elected you can vote them out. If appointed they can be disgraced. But they never go away.

"The officer has been taken off frontline duties pending the outcome of the investigation, and no arrests have been made." The system bends over backward to protect its own, turning "innocent until proven guilty" into an exclusive privilege reserved strictly for badged criminals. While us plebs would have been arrested immediately, thrown into a cell, and stripped of our livelihoods, a corrupt copper gets mollycoddled with bureaucratic immunity and left on the public teat. And what the fuck? Putting an officer accused of digital fraud (with a potential charge of perverting the course of justice) right back behind a keyboard is peak police logic. It's like catching a bank robber red handed and letting them guard the vault while you decide what to do with them. You literally cannot make up the irony of punishing a tech evidence forger by giving them a desk job dealing with data entry. The CPS has confirmed they are contacting courts and defence teams about "potentially impacted cases," past trials and finalised convictions are actively being treated as compromised. Derbyshire Constabulary confirmed the fraud spans a "number of cases," so the scope of the crime goes far beyond a single lie... There is a real possibility that people have already been convicted or are currently in prison because of this fabricated evidence, and this tax payer funded criminal fraudster will be shielded by total anonymity until they likely quietly drop the charges, allowing him to walk away scot free with his damn pension fully intact. Consider this, too; he can claim 'mental distress' from the investigation and secure an early medical retirement, locking in his payout before they can even hold a misconduct hearing. And worse than that; even if he goes to prison, stripping a pension requires personal intervention from the Home Secretary. History shows the government rarely bothers to revoke pensions for regular corruption, meaning the public will likely go on funding this criminal fraudster's retirement for the rest of his life.

Kendi evladın değil diye mi susuyorsun? Susma ! Lütfen paylaş. Hesabım spamlanıyor lütfen takip edebilir misin?

Everything they told you about China and Russia is actually true of Israel Zionist meddling is a national security emergency

Detaining kids aged 8–12 for picking vegetables tells you everything about this occupation.

It is truly mad that some cop can go on tv and undermine the mayor of London whilst shilling for the societal death poison that is Palantir.

From Nelson Mandela, to Guantanamo to Filton 25: ‘terror’ labels are meaningless. After 20 years of Islamophobic terror laws, today people from all walks of life unite to reject them! Our Senior Director, Moazzam Begg shares his personal experience of imprisonment under terror laws at the protest for the Filton four. Direct Action is not terrorism. Free the Filton 25!

The woman police officer who was injured in the Filton 4 case had minor injuries. That was according to medical evidence given at the trial. All the usual suspects are posting she had her spine “smashed in” This is how they manipulate an illiterate public

If a company tried selling apartments in apartheid South Africa in London, there would be outrage. Yet Labour is allowing a real estate fair marketing homes in illegal Israeli settlements built on stolen Palestinian land. Labour rolls out the red carpet for Israeli war criminals, criminalises those resisting genocide, and keeps supplying arms to a genocidal apartheid state. Ban this event NOW.

You can make an argument that people in public sector service roles should not display political insignia. But only if you apply that universally and not make Palestine the exception. I was once asked to remove a Palestine badge by security at parliament. (There is a rule, bizarre as it seems, that you cannot wear political insignia in parliament). Next to me in queue was someone wearing a Ukraine badge. When I challenged why that wasn't being removed the answer was " that's not political". This is all part of the project by Israel and its allies to toxify support for Palestinian rights as something extreme , sinister and outside the boundaries of acceptable discourse, usually via narratives of antisemitism or support for terrorism. Its power is diminishing in the context of the genocide which has been livestreamed. People know what they have seen. But that doesn't mean the political establishment will still not try to use the playbook to repress, grotesquely framing opposition to war crimes and atrocities as a threat to Jewish safety, in this case the safety of Jewish patients. In doing so they undermine amy consistent antiracism, dehumanising Palestinians by suggesting bringing the facts of their oppression into the public domain and demanding an end to UK complicity with it , is something harmful. In the Health sector, the worst example of this was the successful campaign by @UKLFI to get a hospital to remove a display of pottery plates made by children from Gaza , on the basis that the images of Palestinian life and culture prevented Jewish patients attending the hospital. These initiatives must be resisted by all who believe that standing in support of principles of justice and rights and against the crimes of genocide and apartheid is not simply a right but a profound moral duty.

Sentencing the Innocent - Judge Johnson had proven his fascist credentials through rulings much earlier in the Filton trial than his vicious sentencing. Indeed, He had arguably already shown them when he released Tommy Robinson from a prison sentence, or craigmurray.org.uk/archives/…

3 of the 4 people didn’t attack the police officer and all of the 4 were cleared of violent intent. So the only disgrace here is the lie you’re telling to justify a clear miscarriage of justice & the use of anti-terror laws to justify your government’s complicity in a genocide.

Something urgently needs to be done about Justice Johnson. He is clearly subverting the law, and partiality is plastered all over this issue. Time for him to go.

Watching Zionist shills freak out that a juror can talk honestly about a trial after it is complete is the only real silver lining to an otherwise very dark cloud. Jurors absolutely should complain about having crucial facts/context hidden from them. The WHOLE truth?

Mr Justice Jeremy Johnson and others of his ilk in the judiciary would do well to remember that Nazi judges were tried and convicted at Nuremberg for their complicity in genocide. And as MLK said, "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."