Joined January 2017
364 Photos and videos
LibCapital retweeted
"The AI capex boom is likely to weigh on Return on Equity (RoE) for the mega-cap tech stocks in coming years." Goldman Sachs via @BlakeMillardCFA
2
11
31
2,930
LibCapital retweeted
Korean Media: SK Hynix Preparing Massive $66.4 Billion Shareholder Return Program Following ADR Listing - Korean media report that SK Hynix is expected to announce a large-scale shareholder return program worth approximately $66.4 billion after its ADR listing. - To minimize dilution concerns and potential backlash from existing shareholders, the company has reportedly reduced the ADR offering size from 2.4% of outstanding shares to the low-2% range. - SK Hynix is expected to raise approximately KRW 40 trillion (about $26.5 billion) through the issuance of new shares as part of the ADR offering.
21
74
586
152,624
LibCapital retweeted
GLM 5.2 ranks #3 on FrontierSWE. It is only behind Fable 5 and Opus 4.8, and it outperforms GPT-5.5. This is the first model that closes the large gap between models from Anthropic / OpenAI and other providers, and it is the strongest open-weight model by far.
45
131
1,109
274,036
LibCapital retweeted
so it seems like unfortunately we're staying pretty much on-trend and open models are pushing their way towards fable-performance with the usual 4-5 month lag. opus and 5.5 were already very good at cyber especially with scale the right scaffolding. these models are cheaper, have no safeguards or kyc, and can likely be fine-tuned rl'd for even further improvements without significant effort i think it's very obvious at this point that mythos access has *not* been enough for radical changes and hardening of global security we're in for a very rough time very soon
GLM-5.2 passes my tire kick; it is roughly Opus 4.7-4.8 level as advertised. Open source is approximately two months behind closed, if considering the Opus series, and call it 4-5 if we count Mythos/Fable.
29
22
486
92,393
LibCapital retweeted
Mizuho semi supply chain tracker: no delays 800VDC & strong demand $NVDA CPO switch: "In the HVDC/800VDC investment case, the deployment schedule should be an average of 12-month lead-time from the initial system (like power rack) shipment by vendors, in our view" "Lumentum ( $LITE ) highlighted a rising adoption rate of InP-based NPO from its clients and we also expect stronger Google TPU demand to boost $AVGO VCSEL-based NPO sales. "micro-LED (uLED) based optical solutions that are developed and promoted by other chipmakers, such as Credo ( $CRDO ) in ALC (LED cables) and Avicena (private), to capture future scale-up (XPU to XPU) and scale-in (XPU to HBM) opportunities."
5
37
178
59,916
Identifying and owning the bottlenecks of the AI build-out, China edition.
11
51
4,456
LibCapital retweeted
Jun 15
Against all odds. Congrats @elonmusk and @SpaceX.
148
793
6,142
9,853,175
LibCapital retweeted
24x more tokens used by 2030. More inference compute. More earnings across the AI supply chain.
28
32
343
49,689
LibCapital retweeted
Satya Nadella just posted something that validates the entire AI buildout thesis from the very top of the stack. The model is commoditizing. The durable value is the learning loop a company builds on top of the model. He splits it into two assets: Human capital -- the knowledge, judgment, relationships, and pattern recognition of your people. Token capital -- the AI capability the firm builds and owns. He says the real opportunity is building a learning loop where human capital and token capital compound together. If the model layer is commoditizing then the durable returns are not in the model makers. They are in the infrastructure that powers every company building its own loop. Compute. Memory. Interconnect. Power. The full stack underneath the application layer. The model wars will have winners and losers. The infrastructure underneath gets bought either way. Bullish the AI buildout. Every layer. If you want to understand them in detail, check out my Substack. open.substack.com/pub/rensub…
44
183
1,050
211,651
LibCapital retweeted
Researchers show that Claude Code is 98% not AI. Anthropic never gave us the architecture for Claude Code. There were no docs. Just a tool that every developer is currently obsessing over. Until it leaked recently. A research team pulled the source code, analyzed all 500,000 lines, and found something ridiculous. Only 1.6% of the codebase actually interacts with the AI model. The core of Claude Code is literally just a simple while-loop. It asks the model what to do, runs a tool, and repeats. So what is the other 98.4%? It is hardcore, traditional software engineering. The researchers found a massive, complex infrastructure designed entirely to babysit the AI and keep it from hallucinating or destroying your computer: - A 7-mode permission system acting as a security bouncer. - A 5-layer context compaction pipeline so the AI doesn't forget its goal. - A subagent delegation mechanism with strict worktree isolation. - Four different extensibility hooks to manage external tools safely. Every startup right now is trying to build a better AI model to get better results. Anthropic did the exact opposite. They took an existing model and built a fortress of deterministic software around it. They realized that the AI doesn't need to be smarter. It needs to be managed.
160
410
2,118
187,331
With $NVDA and $GOOGL leading on the 800V DC, here's a reminder of who is the only supplier that can go <=1.5mm with VPD. $VICR
$NVDA and $GOOGL lead 800V DC ahead of schedule. "Ahead of schedule", pulled up to Q3 2026 with small volume shipments starting . - Delta Electronics (2308), $VRT - Song Chuan Precision (7788) - Schneider Electric, Eaton, Siemens. All flagged as beneficiaries. "Market sources indicate that Nvidia’s Vera Rubin platform and Google’s next-generation AI data centers will be the first to adopt the technology" Source: Commercial Times The power semi trade should be happy to hear this.
1
313
LibCapital retweeted
Two days ago the US banned Claude Fable 5. Yesterday China dropped GLM 5.2. Today GLM 5.2 is #1 on @bridgebench BS at 100.0, and #1 on Reasoning at 42.8, beating Fable 5. At 1/10th the cost and 300 tokens per second. You cannot export control your way out of an open source race. The ban didn't slow China down. Unban Fable 5.
357
774
6,822
844,593
LibCapital retweeted
Simple, the Trump admin cannot roll out new restrictions/export controls targeting China because the Chinese can/will retaliate We are not in the H100 era, where the supply chain was largely concentrated in Taiwan/Korea/Japan Becuz of shortages, Nvidia & hyperscalers have been forced to qualify Chinese suppliers, especially in the PCB supply chain and electrical components like transformers China had a chokehold on optics (optical fibers and transceivers) from the beginning, and this is just getting amplified as optical content in DCs is increasing Coherent CEO went to China with the Trump delegation, asking for InP for lasers I want u guys to study the optical fiber preform supply chain, and who are the largest suppliers Btw, Chinese exposure is also spreading to other parts of the AI supply chain High end MLCCs use Dysprosium Oxide and China supplies most of it to Japanese producers Tungsten ban from China is causing the prices of WF6 gases to shoot up If PTFE is finalized for M9/M10 CCL, then Shengyi and Chinese PTFE suppliers will have a huge chokehold over Nvidia Google is in talks with Envicool for the supply of cooling components If diamond-copper composites are adopted as heat spreaders for GPUs, then China will establish a chokehold there as well, since most of the synthetic diamonds are produced there and China is at the cutting edge of this tech I haven't even talked about the use cases of gallium, germanium, tellurium, antimony, bismuth, fluorine, terbium, yttrium, ferrite cores in the AI supply chain, and how China has a chokehold there The Trump admin is constrained in a lot of ways and can't unilaterally export control stuff
I share concerns about China’s access to advanced AI models, but if the admin feels so strongly about this, I have a series of questions it should answer: - Why did it loosen export controls to allow AI chip sales to China, which allow China to build its own Mythos? - Why is it not enforcing existing export controls that would prevent China from smuggling AI chips from Southeast Asia and other countries? - Why is it not enforcing existing export controls that would prohibit Chinese companies from training advanced AI models on remotely accessed AI chips? Or imposing tighter controls on remote access? - Why has it still not closed a loophole it created that allows Chinese front companies outside China from making AI chips at TSMC or Samsung? - Why has it not tightened controls on China’s access to semiconductor manufacturing equipment (which have not been updated in over 18 months - the longest the US has ever gone without updating them)? - Why has it not imposed equivalent controls on all advanced AI models being served to China/Chinese companies? - Why did it restrict access to all countries and foreign nationals accessing Mythos/Fable, not just China? If the admin was serious about addressing the challenges posed by China in AI, it would be using export controls to address all of these questions and build a comprehensive strategy to prevent China from building or obtaining advanced models. But over the last 1.5 years, it has loosened or ignored controls on China, and only opened new loopholes in controls it inherited. If the admin truly has deep concerns about China’s access to advanced models, it has to act accordingly. It isn’t.
43
115
972
199,194
LibCapital retweeted
Fable isn't the first. In 1999 the department of defense blocked exports of the PowerMac G4 for crossing the 1 gigaflop threshold. Steve Jobs turned it into an ad.
217
1,648
20,802
1,639,922
LibCapital retweeted
Nassim Taleb: the richest man in the Roman Empire woke up every morning pretending he was poor. Seneca had more to lose than to gain from his wealth - so he rehearsed losing it. Every so often he'd live on bread and water as if shipwrecked, just to make the downside familiar and harmless. That's the whole game, Taleb says: arrange your life so you have far more upside than downside - then randomness stops scaring you. "Make more when you're right than you lose when you're wrong - that's antifragile." "Always keep more upside than downside from random events." "The Stoics aren't unmoved by the world - only by bad events." ~70 min, free. the oldest trick for surviving a world you can't predict ↓
Daniel Kahneman: the day Saddam Hussein was captured, the same news "explained" both the bond market going up and going down. Treasuries rose - Bloomberg's headline said the capture made the world safer. Half an hour later treasuries fell -the new headline said the capture boosted appetite for risk. Same event, opposite stories. The market moved first; the pundits reverse-engineered a reason. That, he says, is how financial commentary actually works. "Our confidence comes from the coherence of the story - not the evidence behind it." "The conclusion comes first. Then we believe the arguments that support it." "System 1 is largely indifferent to the quality and amount of evidence." ~55 min, free. why the market's "explanations" are stories told after the fact ↓
25
616
4,085
684,473
LibCapital retweeted
Okay, here we go again. On 0DTE, you can classify days into straddle-buy and straddle-sell days simply by ranking the straddle by vol rank.
16
17
268
40,542
LibCapital retweeted
“Do not compare, do not measure. No other way is like yours.” — Carl Jung
26
542
2,767
43,291
Nice
$vicr now a top 5 AI stock pick by Steven Cress, head of Seeking Alpha quant team His top picks in the past include $mu, $crdo, $app, $cien, and $cohr
1
133
LibCapital retweeted
Data from Altimeter: Morgan Stanley now projecting $GOOG to spend $299B on CapEx next year up 57% from $190B this year The biggest revision to previous estimates by a country mile.. $MSFT. CapEx est. revised from $178B to $276B in 2027 🤯 Hyperscaler CapEx now est. >$1.1T
28
94
573
82,118
LibCapital retweeted
Today feels like a good day to reshare this clip of Ariane Aerospace’s CEO calling SpaceX’s reusability plans “a dream”
419
1,213
10,307
1,672,005