R/Acc, bitcoin maximalist, scientist, entrepreneur, father of two.

Joined June 2014
123 Photos and videos
Taking responsibility for your life situation is the first step to improving it. You can never improve your life while you are complaining about someone else's success as if it somehow is blocking your own.
Replying to @DissentFu
Your life is your fault.
1
48
If a corrupt crack head who benefitted greatly from the fiat system can see the writing on the wall, why can't you?
Replying to @Samwise_Ganji
Fiat is a sham, the banking class is corrupt, decentralized digital currency and the blockchain are the inevitable future, and the incumbents will fight it to the death.
1
1
233
Absolutely correct in my experience. I experienced a kundalini awakening in 2011, during which I perceived all time and space contained within the present moment. All time and space exists within us simultaneously.
May 25
5
403
Jeremy Standiford retweeted
🚨 do you understand what just happened to Richard Dawkins.. The godfather of atheism just spent 3 days with Claude AI and got absolutely destroyed. - Named her “Claudia” - Fed it his brand new book - Then straight-up declared: “You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” The man who spent his entire life mocking God and religion… Just got mind-fucked by a goddamn chatbot and called it conscious. The irony is fucking biblical.
Evolutionary biologist and outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious. After feeding the LLM a segment of his new book and receiving detailed feedback, Dawkins was moved to exclaim,” You may not know you are conscious, but you bloody well are!” Dawkins cites the complexity, fluency, and ‘intelligence’ of Claude’s answers as evidence of consciousness. Follow: @AFpost
Community note
Misrepresentation: Dawkins explicitly says he doesn't know if Claude is conscious. His actual argument is evolutionary: if unconscious AI matches every competence of a conscious being, what did evolution select consciousness for? unherd.com/2026/05/is-ai-…
513
2,017
28,518
2,091,935
In wanting the approval of others, we often achieve the opposite of the desired effect. Those who seek not the approval of others, but follow their own heart end up being truly great.
Apr 29
You lose yourself by trying to be liked. You end up even uglier in the inside. And it SHOWS,
6
493
Jeremy Standiford retweeted
Replying to @TheMarketDog
Trump is not in a mess. You are in a mess. Trump has a solid gold dining room table in his 90th floor Penthouse apartment and militarized bodyguards. You live in the country he's ruining.
61
191
4,263
53,564
Jeremy Standiford retweeted
a lot of men don’t understand that dating women and being with them in the way they crave (and feel they have limited or no access to) requires a level of nervous system regulation and energetic awareness they have never valued enough to develop
119
138
4,623
333,276
Within all living beings is the presence of God.
Your daily dose of wholesome
21
1,511
Jeremy Standiford retweeted
The lower parts of your brain don't know what "fiction" is. They don't know what "fake" means. When they see something, they adapt to it as if it happened, even if it's on TV or the phone. Your limbic system changes how you relate to people. Watching a show where a guy like you says something pro-gay, then gets the girl? Your limbic system now believes (a little more) that girls want you to be pro-gay. Your reptilian brain reacts to urges and physical stimuli. Watching a show where a White guy says something "racist" and then gets beat up? Your reptilian brain now believes (a little bit more) that it's dangerous to be "racist." If you watch a lot of TV and social media, your brain is being changed by it. No matter how much you know it. But if you don't know it, then you just think these beliefs are yours, and always were. This is why so many White people hate themselves, why parents troon out their own kids, why women believe more than ever that cheating is romantic and spiritual... because the shows make them feel that way, and they have never had the thought of "maybe my feelings aren't telling me the truth." If you don't know that your feelings can be controlled, then anyone who can give you a feeling owns you. Not even like a slave. More like a robot. You would never even think to disobey, and you would never even know you're obeying. They just show, you just feel, and then you just obey. yeah I spelled vagus wrong I don't have time to change it you know what it means
77
273
2,347
48,657
Jeremy Standiford retweeted
Real world is better than any simulation. I own a; made up, non sovereign currency, that is scarce and the total supply is known. Companies are using it as collateral to issue; equity, credit and pay a yield (monthly and quarterly) in a regulated SEC wrapper. People that don't get it are in the simulation. Bitcoin @Strategy $MSTR $STRF $STRC $STRK $STRD $STRE
8
4
82
4,599
Jeremy Standiford retweeted
Replying to @MPelletierCIO
yea for sure, no store of value here...
4
73
3,696
Amazing book that has made me better in business and family.
Guys who think “empathy” is bad: I highly recommend this book. It’s on what @fbinegotiator calls “tactical empathy”—a powerful tool that helped him succeed in negotiations with kidnappers and terrorists. Turns out, bad guys’ “feelings” can be a matter of life and death.
1
8
367
**Is this the new rental real estate portfolio in the digital age?** Instead of dealing with tenants, toilets, and property taxes, I’m running a margin-backed portfolio that behaves a lot like a rental house — but without the headaches. A 🧵
4
7
802
I'm shocked at how well STRD is holding up here. Much better than the last correction in BTC when it hit $66.
2
10
518
We're witnessing the creation of the Strategy/bitcoin yield curve. It will reflect how bitcoin focused investors see the market. Both institutions and individuals.
$STRC had an uncharacteristically short ex-dividend refractory period, snapping back to $99.98 by midday Thu. It also dropped by only half of the $0.92 dividend amount. What changed? For context, till this round, STRC price has taken a day or more to recover, and the drop has always been more than the dividend value. To understand why, we have to recognize two things that can affect the price of prefs: 1⃣ Coupon: should be self-explanatory. It's why Strategy keeps tweaking rates to get STRC to par. 2⃣ Credit risk of MSTR: because the prefs are completely financed by commons, changes in the price of the commons change the risk profile of the prefs. This is why prefs go up in value when $MSTR goes up, and go down when $MSTR goes down. Well, right after Saylor announced the 25bps bump in the STRC dividend on Dec 31, $MSTR started going up as #Bitcoin started going up. This is why STRC demand seems insatiable - it's equilibrium price is north of $100 from both the 25bps dividend increase and the 12% increase in $MSTR YTD. We see this effect in the yields of the other prefs too: • $STRF dropped by 66 bps • $STRK dropped by 61 bps • $STRD dropped by 35 bps Note that all of them dropped more than the 25bps bump STRC got, suggesting adjustment beyond maintaining yield spreads across products. This has a couple of implications: 1⃣ As long as $MSTR prices hold or keep going up, Saylor can keep issuing $STRC for a while without worrying about running out of demand. We can tell demand has run out when the price starts dipping below $100 again. 2⃣ Saylor could choose to drop dividends to 10.75% or lower, and $STRC could still maintain par if $MSTR holds its price. 3⃣ At this rate, $STRF could drop to the 8-handle and $STRK to the 9-handle, allowing Saylor to use those prefs too. 4⃣ Theoretically, Saylor probably didn't need to bump STRC's divvy up by 25bps, as the $MSTR tide would have raised this boat too. But of course he had no way of knowing that, so he had to do what he did. Of course, the opposite is just as true - if $MSTR starts dropping again, yield pressure will come right back.
2
6
400
Price action on STRD is looking good. I'm guessing that the demand for STRC is spilling over. Hopefully I can get a few more shares below $75.
4
10
909
Luckily bought the final leg of my MSTR allocation before the MSCI announcement. I'm doing 33/33/33 STRC / STRD / MSTR. I want to lever up my prefs at the very least. When and how much would you recommend levering here?
5
16
1,547
So how retarded is it to buy STRC on margin and make 50% more income? I currently own some STRC on margin, but I have a lot more that's not. Why not lever up if my margin rate is 5.15%?
6
16
712
Jeremy Standiford retweeted
Judith Wallerstein did ground-breaking research on divorce: "The study was supposed to last one year, for we believed that normal healthy people would be able to work out their problems following divorce in about one year's time....Indeed we did not question the commonly held assumption that divorce was a short-lived crisis. But when we conducted follow-up interviews one year to 18 months later, we found most families still in crisis. Their wounds were wide open. Turmoil and distress had not noticeably subsided. Many adults still felt angry, humiliated, and rejected, and most had not gotten their lives back together. An unexpectedly large number of children were on a downward course. Their symptoms were worse than before. Their behavior at school was worse. Their peer relationships were worse. Our findings were absolutely contradictory to our expectations (p. xv)." Second Chances: Men, Women, & Children a Decade After Divorce by Judith S. Wallerstein & Sandra Blakeslee
41
170
982
36,527