🌸I’m going to tell you something that immediately caught my attention when reading Spielberg’s statements.
It’s not so much what he says. It’s how he says it.
For decades, the word “alien” served to simplify an enormously complex phenomenon. Everything was reduced to visitors from another planet. It didn’t matter whether they were small, tall, grey, Nordic, hostile, or friendly. Everything ended up inside the same mental box.
Now another term appears.
“Non-human entities.”
And from the Taygetan framework, that carries enormous implications.
The reason is simple. The word “alien” no longer suffices to describe everything that has been reported over decades.
When I hear “non-human entities,” I don’t automatically think of space visitors.
I think of Greys.
I think of bio-robots.
I think of artificial organisms.
I think of astral entities.
I think of biological beings that function as extensions of others.
I think of consciousnesses using bodies as temporary vehicles.
I think of a much more complex reality than the classic narrative of “beings that come from another planet.”
That is why it draws my attention when Spielberg says he wants to get closer to real testimonies.
Real testimonies describe bulbous heads.
Huge eyes.
Small bodies.
Strange presences.
Experiences where communication seems to occur without words.
Experiences where the person remembers fragments, isolated images, intense emotions, and very rarely a complete sequence of events.
And right there the topic of the eyes appears.
And this is where I think many people stay on the surface.
Within Taygetan material, eyes never appear as a simple physical detail.
They constantly appear associated with contact experiences.
With fragmented memories.
With telepathic communication.
With moments where the person feels something is happening but cannot fully understand what.
Many people remember the eyes.
They remember the gaze.
They remember the sensation.
The rest becomes blurry.
The complete sequence disappears.
The eyes remain.
When Spielberg insists so much on that point, I don’t see it as a simple artistic choice. I see it as a direct reference to one of the most repeated elements in contact accounts.
There is also another issue.
The expression “non-human entities” seems more advanced.
More modern.
More serious.
However, it can also be even more ambiguous.
It can include absolutely anything.
And when a word can describe everything, it can also end up describing nothing.
Within the Taygetan framework, there is a huge difference between a Zeta Reticuli Gardener, an Orion Grey, a bio-robot, an astral entity, or any other non-human presence.
Grouping all of them under the same label creates exactly the same problem that once existed with the word “alien.”
The difference is that now the label looks more sophisticated.
More acceptable to the public.
More compatible with a future cultural normalization of the phenomenon.
That is where I would pay attention.
Not to the film.
Not to the special effects.
Not to the marketing.
To the language.
Words are never innocent.
First the vocabulary changes.
Then perception changes.
Then what people consider possible changes.
We have been seeing that process for decades.
That is why, when I hear Spielberg talk about non-human entities, I don’t ask myself whether he is talking about extraterrestrials.
I ask myself what kind of entities.
What origin they have.
What function they fulfill.
What nature they possess.
And above all, I ask myself something much more uncomfortable.
Whether we are truly moving toward a deeper understanding of the phenomenon… or simply replacing one word with another while the fog remains exactly in the same place.✨💫
#NonHumanEntities #UFOPhenomenon #PerceptionShift #TaygetaOfficial