Filter
Exclude
Time range
-
Near
Combien de fois faudra-t-il répéter que les forêts #Miyawaki, censées pousser dix fois plus vite et capter trente fois plus de carbone, sont une IMPOSTURE SCIENTIFIQUE ? Ces chiffres sont FAUX. Combien de fois devrons-nous encore combattre ce phénomène de mode qui prospère sur des promesses miraculeuses, tout en violant ouvertement les lois fondamentales de la biologie végétale ? Combien de militants pseudo-écolos, d’influenceurs et de politiciens en quête de solutions miracles vont-ils continuer à propager ces foutaises ? Anne #Hidalgo y avait succombé elle aussi à #Paris : cela n'a rien donné, un budget important dépensé en pure perte et beaucoup de propagande sur du vide ! On croyait cet engouement enterré, faute de résultats probants. Pourtant, il resurgit sans cesse. Les gens préfèrent croire et espérer, même l’impossible, plutôt que de comprendre pourquoi cela ne peut pas marcher. Il n’y a pas de miracle. #Greenwashing #ScienceFraud #FakeScience besjournals.onlinelibrary.wi…
En los años 70, una empresa siderúrgica japonesa llamada Nippon Steel tenía un problema: sus instalaciones industriales habían arrasado el paisaje y necesitaban plantar algo verde alrededor. Llamaron a un botánico de la Universidad Nacional de Yokohama llamado Akira Miyawaki. Lo que Miyawaki plantó no se parecía a nada que Nippon Steel hubiera visto antes. Miyawaki había nacido el 29 de enero de 1928 en la prefectura de Okayama, en el seno de una familia de agricultores. Estudió ecología vegetal en Hiroshima y luego se marchó a Alemania a trabajar con el botánico Reinhold Tüxen, pionero de la fitosociología, la ciencia que estudia cómo las plantas forman comunidades entre sí. De Tüxen aprendió el concepto que definiría toda su carrera: la vegetación potencial natural, es decir, lo que crecería en un lugar determinado si el ser humano no lo hubiera alterado nunca. Cuando volvió a Japón en 1960, empezó a recorrer templos y santuarios sintoístas. Había allí algo que el resto del país había perdido: los chinju-no-mori, los bosques sagrados que rodeaban los lugares de culto y que llevaban siglos sin ser tocados porque se consideraban protegidos por los dioses. Eran densos, caóticos, extraordinariamente ricos en especies. Miyawaki los cartografió durante años como referencia de lo que debía existir. Cuando Nippon Steel lo llamó, aplicó exactamente esa lógica: averiguó qué especies habrían crecido naturalmente en ese suelo, preparó la tierra con materia orgánica, y plantó decenas de especies nativas juntas, en alta densidad, dejando que compitieran y se organizaran como lo haría un bosque joven. Sus colegas lo miraban con escepticismo. Decían que los árboles se ahogarían entre sí. No se ahogaron. Crecieron diez veces más rápido que en reforestaciones convencionales. En dos o tres años se volvían autosuficientes. Capturaban treinta veces más CO₂ que los bosques plantados de forma tradicional. Y eran treinta veces más densos. El método se extendió. Miyawaki plantó más de 4.000 bosques en 40 países a lo largo de su vida, desde Japón hasta Malasia, Brasil, Francia y España. En sus propias palabras, recogidas en su discurso al recibir el Premio Blue Planet en 2006: "En lugar de restaurar simplemente los bosques que existían antes, este trabajo implica crear genuinos bosques nativos a través de rigurosos estudios de campo e investigación ecológica para asegurar un futuro sin cometer errores." Murió el 16 de julio de 2021, a los 93 años. Lo que dejó no es solo un método de plantar árboles. Es una pregunta que cualquier ciudad del mundo puede hacerse antes de empezar: ¿qué bosque quería crecer aquí antes de que llegáramos nosotros? Fuentes: Wikipedia / Akira Miyawaki — datos biográficos verificados con fechas y premios Universidad de Washington Tacoma, Miyawaki Microforest Project — documentación técnica del método con datos verificados: 10x velocidad, 30x densidad Mongabay, "Miyawaki forests are a global sensation" (junio 2023) — análisis académico con fuentes primarias del método y sus críticos Fundación Asahi Glass, Premio Blue Planet (2006) — cita directa de Miyawaki en su discurso de aceptación
Community note
All the impressive figures triumphantly announced by Akira Miyawaki have proven to be scientifically unfounded. There is no miraculous method capable of making a forest grow “ten times faster” and capture “30 times more CO2”. besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/13…
5
50
135
7,729
🚨 Blood Test Lab Owner Sentenced to >4 Years for $11.2M Medicare Fraud & Tax Evasion Used a shill to collect payments — straight federal healthcare takedown. Facing criminal charges? Medicare fraud, lab fraud, grant fraud or science fraud? FormerFedsGroup.Com delivers aggressive criminal defense from insiders who know how these cases are built. DM us now for confidential strategy. #GrantFraud #ScienceFraud

Blood test lab owner sentenced to more than four years in federal prison for using shill to collect Medicare payments to evade $11.2 million in taxes justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/blo…
3
5
156
@SciGuardians : « 🚨SCANDALE BOMBSHELL SUR L'INTÉGRITÉ SCIENTIFIQUE – 17 NOV 2025 Elisabeth M. Bik – la fausse « consultante en intégrité scientifique » qui se vante d'avoir >10 000 commentaires PubPeer – a passé des années à traquer, diffamer et détruire les carrières des chercheurs qu'elle cible. Mais osez poster un seul commentaire critique sur SES articles ou sur le mob de son cercle restreint ? 100 % CENSURÉ. 17 de ses articles et de ceux de ses collaborateurs signalés → 17 commentaires instantanément bloqués. Un a réussi à passer le 23 nov 2024 → EFFACÉ après exactement 10 jours (3 déc 2024). La reine de PubSmear vient de se faire prendre en train de truquer le jeu pour se protéger elle-même et son réseau. Exposition totale de 9 minutes avec captures d'écran, DOIs et preuves vient de tomber. Regardez-la. Partagez-la. Le masque est brisé. #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 »
🚨BOMBSHELL SCIENCE INTEGRITY SCANDAL – 17 NOV 2025 Elisabeth M. Bik – the fake “science integrity consultant” who brags about >10,000 PubPeer comments – has spent years stalking, smearing, and destroying careers of researchers she targets. But dare post a single critical comment on HER papers or her inner-circle mob? 100 % CENSORED. 17 of her and her collaborators’ papers flagged → 17 comments instantly blocked. One slipped through on 23 Nov 2024 → ERASED after exactly 10 days (3 Dec 2024). The queen of PubSmear just got caught rigging the game to protect herself and her network. 9-minute total exposure with screenshots, DOIs, and receipts just dropped. Watch it. Spread it. The mask is shattered. #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱
2
100
130
3,304
🚨 LA VRAIE RAISON POUR LAQUELLE LA SCIENCE EST EN TRAIN DE MOURIR : LES GARDIENS DE L’« INTÉGRITÉ » SONT LES PLUS GROS ESCROCS Alors que les cas de fraude scientifique, les revues prédatrices, les usines à articles, les conférences prédatrices et les pratiques éditoriales abusives ont explosé au cours de la dernière décennie, une grande partie de la communauté universitaire s’est enfoncée dans un profond sentiment d’impuissance et de silence. Ce n’est pas une coïncidence. La question légitime est : pourquoi ? La réponse est simple et accablante : les mécanismes et les plateformes mêmes qui étaient censés donner aux chercheurs les moyens de lutter contre la fraude ont eux-mêmes été capturés, compromis et transformés en armes. Exemple concret : en 2024, le Prix de la Fondation Einstein pour la promotion de la qualité dans la recherche (@Einstein_Berlin) a été décerné — sans aucune enquête réelle ni diligence raisonnable — tant au niveau institutionnel qu'individuel. Il a été décerné à Brandon Stell (@CNRS), cofondateur de la plateforme frauduleuse PubPeer (alias PubSmear), et à Elisabeth M. Bik, qui se présente comme « consultante en intégrité scientifique ». L'équipe juridique et d'enquête de ScienceGuardians™ a révélé, preuves irréfutables à l'appui, comment Stell, Bik et leur réseau PubSmear mènent l'une des opérations de fraude les plus sophistiquées du monde universitaire : ils gèrent des centaines de faux pseudonymes contrôlés par une trentaine d'acteurs clés disposant d'un accès de niveau modérateur, publient des dizaines de milliers d'entrées, censurant systématiquement les critiques justifiant un retrait ou une « expression de préoccupation » concernant leurs propres articles, en manipulant les archives, en faisant pression sur les revues et les institutions pour qu’elles achètent leurs « tableaux de bord », en gérant de faux comptes WeChat pour harceler des universitaires chinois, et en orchestrant des campagnes coordonnées de diffamation, de calomnie et de harcèlement — tout cela en se cachant derrière le faux étendard de « l’intégrité de la recherche ». Et ce n’est que la partie émergée de l’iceberg. Il ne s'agit pas d'une simple négligence. Il s'agit de corruption systémique. ⚠️ Le prix qui était censé célébrer l'intégrité a au contraire été décerné à ceux-là mêmes qui la détruisent. Il existe des niveaux de corruption bien plus profonds derrière la manière dont ce prix a été décerné — et nous les dévoilerons bientôt. Restez à l'écoute. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ a pour mission de dénoncer la corruption, de donner les moyens d’agir aux chercheurs et de rétablir une véritable intégrité dans le domaine scientifique.
2
21
🚨 科学が死にかけている本当の理由:「誠実さ」の守護者たちこそが最大の詐欺師である 過去10年間で、科学的不正行為、プレデタージャーナル、ペーパーミル、プレデターカンファレンス、そして搾取的な出版慣行が爆発的に増加する一方で、学術コミュニティの大部分は深い無力感と沈黙に陥っている。 これは偶然ではない。 正当な疑問はこうだ。なぜなのか? その答えは単純であり、かつ衝撃的だ――研究者が不正と戦う力を与えるはずだった仕組みやプラットフォームそのものが、乗っ取られ、腐敗し、武器化されてしまったのだ。 その好例が、2024年に授与された「研究の質向上に対するアインシュタイン財団賞(@Einstein_Berlin)」である。この賞は、組織レベルでも個人レベルでも、実質的な調査やデューデリジェンスが一切行われないまま授与された。 この賞は、詐欺的なプラットフォーム「PubPeer」(別名「PubSmear」)の共同創設者であるブランドン・ステル(@CNRS)と、自称「科学の誠実性コンサルタント」であるエリザベス・M・ビックに授与された。 ScienceGuardians™の法務・調査チームは、ステール、ビック、そして彼らのPubSmearネットワーク集団が、学術界において最も洗練された詐欺作戦の一つをどのように展開しているかを、否定できない証拠をもって暴露した。その手口とは、モデレーター権限を持つ約30人の主要メンバーが管理する数百の偽の別名アカウントを運用し、数万件の投稿を行い、 自身の論文に対する「撤回」レベルや「懸念表明」レベルの批判を網羅的に検閲し、記録を改ざんし、ジャーナルや機関に「ダッシュボード」の購入を強要し、偽のWeChatアカウントを運営して中国の学者を嫌がらせ、組織的な中傷、名誉毀損、嫌がらせキャンペーンを仕掛ける——これらすべてを、「研究の誠実性」という偽りの旗印の陰に隠れて行っているのです。そして、これは氷山の一角に過ぎません。 これは単なる見落としではない。 これは組織的な腐敗である。 ⚠️ 誠実さを称えるはずだった賞が、それこそを破壊している張本人たちに授与されてしまった。 この賞が実際に授与された背景には、はるかに深い腐敗の層が存在する――我々はまもなくそれらを暴く。続報にご注目ください。 #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™は、腐敗を暴き、研究者を支援し、科学における真の誠実さを回復するために存在します。 @Mami_Aho_Dema @seseragiryu
🚨 THE REAL REASON SCIENCE IS DYING: "INTEGRITY" GUARDIANS ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUDS While scientific misconduct, predatory journals, paper mills, predatory conferences, and exploitative publishing practices have exploded over the past decade, a huge portion of the academic community has sunk into deep disempowerment and silence. This is not a coincidence. The legitimate question is: Why? The answer is simple and devastating — the very mechanisms and platforms that were supposed to empower researchers to fight fraud have themselves been captured, compromised, and weaponized. Case in point: In 2024, the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research (@Einstein_Berlin) was handed out — with zero real investigation or due diligence — at both institutional and individual levels. It was awarded to Brandon Stell (@CNRS), co-founder of the fraudulent PubPeer (aka PubSmear) platform, and to Elisabeth M. Bik, the self-proclaimed “science integrity consultant”. ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team has exposed with undeniable evidence how Stell, Bik, and their PubSmear network mob are running one of the most sophisticated fraud operations in academia: operating hundreds of fake aliases controlled by ~30 core actors with moderator-level access, posting tens of thousands of entries, blanket-censoring retraction-level and Expression-of-Concern-level critiques on their own papers, manipulating records, pressuring journals and institutions into buying their “dashboards”, running fake WeChat accounts to harass Chinese academics, and orchestrating coordinated smear, defamation, and harassment campaigns — all while hiding behind the false banner of “research integrity”. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg. This is not oversight. This is systemic corruption. ⚠️ The award that was meant to celebrate integrity was instead given to the very actors destroying it. There are far deeper layers of corruption behind how this award was actually given — and we will expose them soon. Stay tuned. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ exists to expose corruption, empower researchers, and restore real integrity in science.
1
15
28
1,472
🚨 DER WAHRE GRUND, WARUM DIE WISSENSCHAFT IM STERBEN LIEGT: DIE „INTEGRITÄTS“-WÄCHTER SIND DIE GRÖSSTEN BETRÜGER Während wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten, Raubzeitschriften, Paper Mills, Raubkonferenzen und ausbeuterische Veröffentlichungspraktiken in den letzten zehn Jahren explosionsartig zugenommen haben, ist ein großer Teil der akademischen Gemeinschaft in tiefe Ohnmacht und Schweigen versunken. Das ist kein Zufall. Die berechtigte Frage lautet: Warum? Die Antwort ist einfach und vernichtend – genau jene Mechanismen und Plattformen, die Forschern eigentlich die Mittel an die Hand geben sollten, um Betrug zu bekämpfen, wurden selbst vereinnahmt, kompromittiert und als Waffen eingesetzt. Ein typisches Beispiel: Im Jahr 2024 wurde der Einstein-Stiftungspreis zur Förderung von Qualität in der Forschung (@Einstein_Berlin) – ohne jegliche echte Untersuchung oder Sorgfaltsprüfung – sowohl auf institutioneller als auch auf individueller Ebene verliehen. Er ging an Brandon Stell (@CNRS), Mitbegründer der betrügerischen Plattform PubPeer (alias PubSmear), und an Elisabeth M. Bik, die selbsternannte „Beraterin für wissenschaftliche Integrität“. Das Rechts- und Ermittlungsteam von ScienceGuardians™ hat mit unwiderlegbaren Beweisen aufgedeckt, wie Stell, Bik und ihre PubSmear-Netzwerkbande eine der raffiniertesten Betrugsoperationen im akademischen Bereich betreiben: Sie verwalten Hunderte von gefälschten Aliasnamen, die von etwa 30 Hauptakteuren mit Moderatorzugriff kontrolliert werden, veröffentlichen Zehntausende von Beiträgen, Kritik an ihren eigenen Arbeiten, die eine Rücknahme oder eine „Expression of Concern“ rechtfertigen würde, pauschal zensieren, Aufzeichnungen manipulieren, Zeitschriften und Institutionen dazu drängen, ihre „Dashboards“ zu kaufen, gefälschte WeChat-Konten betreiben, um chinesische Wissenschaftler zu schikanieren, und koordinierte Verleumdungs-, Diffamierungs- und Schikanierungskampagnen orchestrieren – und das alles, während sie sich hinter dem falschen Banner der „Forschungsintegrität“ verstecken. Und das ist nur die Spitze des Eisbergs. Das ist kein Versehen. Das ist systemische Korruption. ⚠️ Der Preis, der eigentlich die Integrität würdigen sollte, wurde stattdessen genau den Akteuren verliehen, die sie zerstören. Hinter der Art und Weise, wie dieser Preis tatsächlich vergeben wurde, verbergen sich weitaus tiefere Ebenen der Korruption – und wir werden sie bald aufdecken. Bleiben Sie dran. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ wurde gegründet, um Korruption aufzudecken, Forscher zu stärken und echte Integrität in der Wissenschaft wiederherzustellen.
🚨 THE REAL REASON SCIENCE IS DYING: "INTEGRITY" GUARDIANS ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUDS While scientific misconduct, predatory journals, paper mills, predatory conferences, and exploitative publishing practices have exploded over the past decade, a huge portion of the academic community has sunk into deep disempowerment and silence. This is not a coincidence. The legitimate question is: Why? The answer is simple and devastating — the very mechanisms and platforms that were supposed to empower researchers to fight fraud have themselves been captured, compromised, and weaponized. Case in point: In 2024, the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research (@Einstein_Berlin) was handed out — with zero real investigation or due diligence — at both institutional and individual levels. It was awarded to Brandon Stell (@CNRS), co-founder of the fraudulent PubPeer (aka PubSmear) platform, and to Elisabeth M. Bik, the self-proclaimed “science integrity consultant”. ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team has exposed with undeniable evidence how Stell, Bik, and their PubSmear network mob are running one of the most sophisticated fraud operations in academia: operating hundreds of fake aliases controlled by ~30 core actors with moderator-level access, posting tens of thousands of entries, blanket-censoring retraction-level and Expression-of-Concern-level critiques on their own papers, manipulating records, pressuring journals and institutions into buying their “dashboards”, running fake WeChat accounts to harass Chinese academics, and orchestrating coordinated smear, defamation, and harassment campaigns — all while hiding behind the false banner of “research integrity”. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg. This is not oversight. This is systemic corruption. ⚠️ The award that was meant to celebrate integrity was instead given to the very actors destroying it. There are far deeper layers of corruption behind how this award was actually given — and we will expose them soon. Stay tuned. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ exists to expose corruption, empower researchers, and restore real integrity in science.
5
12
493
🚨 LA VRAIE RAISON POUR LAQUELLE LA SCIENCE EST EN TRAIN DE MOURIR : LES GARDIENS DE L’« INTÉGRITÉ » SONT LES PLUS GROS ESCROCS Alors que les cas de fraude scientifique, les revues prédatrices, les usines à articles, les conférences prédatrices et les pratiques éditoriales abusives ont explosé au cours de la dernière décennie, une grande partie de la communauté universitaire s’est enfoncée dans un profond sentiment d’impuissance et de silence. Ce n’est pas une coïncidence. La question légitime est : pourquoi ? La réponse est simple et accablante : les mécanismes et les plateformes mêmes qui étaient censés donner aux chercheurs les moyens de lutter contre la fraude ont eux-mêmes été capturés, compromis et transformés en armes. Exemple concret : en 2024, le Prix de la Fondation Einstein pour la promotion de la qualité dans la recherche (@Einstein_Berlin) a été décerné — sans aucune enquête réelle ni diligence raisonnable — tant au niveau institutionnel qu'individuel. Il a été décerné à Brandon Stell (@CNRS), cofondateur de la plateforme frauduleuse PubPeer (alias PubSmear), et à Elisabeth M. Bik, qui se présente comme « consultante en intégrité scientifique ». L'équipe juridique et d'enquête de ScienceGuardians™ a révélé, preuves irréfutables à l'appui, comment Stell, Bik et leur réseau PubSmear mènent l'une des opérations de fraude les plus sophistiquées du monde universitaire : ils gèrent des centaines de faux pseudonymes contrôlés par une trentaine d'acteurs clés disposant d'un accès de niveau modérateur, publient des dizaines de milliers d'entrées, censurant systématiquement les critiques justifiant un retrait ou une « expression de préoccupation » concernant leurs propres articles, en manipulant les archives, en faisant pression sur les revues et les institutions pour qu’elles achètent leurs « tableaux de bord », en gérant de faux comptes WeChat pour harceler des universitaires chinois, et en orchestrant des campagnes coordonnées de diffamation, de calomnie et de harcèlement — tout cela en se cachant derrière le faux étendard de « l’intégrité de la recherche ». Et ce n’est que la partie émergée de l’iceberg. Il ne s'agit pas d'une simple négligence. Il s'agit de corruption systémique. ⚠️ Le prix qui était censé célébrer l'intégrité a au contraire été décerné à ceux-là mêmes qui la détruisent. Il existe des niveaux de corruption bien plus profonds derrière la manière dont ce prix a été décerné — et nous les dévoilerons bientôt. Restez à l'écoute. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ a pour mission de dénoncer la corruption, de donner les moyens d’agir aux chercheurs et de rétablir une véritable intégrité dans le domaine scientifique.
🚨 THE REAL REASON SCIENCE IS DYING: "INTEGRITY" GUARDIANS ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUDS While scientific misconduct, predatory journals, paper mills, predatory conferences, and exploitative publishing practices have exploded over the past decade, a huge portion of the academic community has sunk into deep disempowerment and silence. This is not a coincidence. The legitimate question is: Why? The answer is simple and devastating — the very mechanisms and platforms that were supposed to empower researchers to fight fraud have themselves been captured, compromised, and weaponized. Case in point: In 2024, the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research (@Einstein_Berlin) was handed out — with zero real investigation or due diligence — at both institutional and individual levels. It was awarded to Brandon Stell (@CNRS), co-founder of the fraudulent PubPeer (aka PubSmear) platform, and to Elisabeth M. Bik, the self-proclaimed “science integrity consultant”. ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team has exposed with undeniable evidence how Stell, Bik, and their PubSmear network mob are running one of the most sophisticated fraud operations in academia: operating hundreds of fake aliases controlled by ~30 core actors with moderator-level access, posting tens of thousands of entries, blanket-censoring retraction-level and Expression-of-Concern-level critiques on their own papers, manipulating records, pressuring journals and institutions into buying their “dashboards”, running fake WeChat accounts to harass Chinese academics, and orchestrating coordinated smear, defamation, and harassment campaigns — all while hiding behind the false banner of “research integrity”. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg. This is not oversight. This is systemic corruption. ⚠️ The award that was meant to celebrate integrity was instead given to the very actors destroying it. There are far deeper layers of corruption behind how this award was actually given — and we will expose them soon. Stay tuned. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ exists to expose corruption, empower researchers, and restore real integrity in science.
1
55
86
5,488
Merci @SciGuardians pour votre travail !! 🙏🙌 « 🚨 LA VRAIE RAISON POUR LAQUELLE LA SCIENCE EST EN TRAIN DE MOURIR : LES GARDIENS DE L'« INTÉGRITÉ » SONT LES PLUS GROS ARNAQUEURS Alors que les manquements scientifiques, les revues prédatrices, les usines à articles, les conférences prédatrices et les pratiques d'édition exploiteuses ont explosé au cours de la dernière décennie, une énorme partie de la communauté académique s'est enfoncée dans une profonde dépossession et un silence assourdissant. Ce n'est pas une coïncidence. La question légitime est : Pourquoi ? La réponse est simple et dévastatrice — les mécanismes et les plateformes mêmes qui étaient censés donner aux chercheurs les moyens de lutter contre la fraude ont eux-mêmes été capturés, compromis et instrumentalisés. Exemple concret : En 2024, le prix de la Fondation Einstein pour la promotion de la qualité en recherche (@Einstein_Berlin) a été décerné — sans aucune enquête réelle ni diligence raisonnable — tant au niveau institutionnel qu'individuel. Il a été attribué à Brandon Stell (@CNRS), cofondateur de la plateforme frauduleuse PubPeer (aussi connue sous le nom de PubSmear), et à Elisabeth M. Bik, l'autoproclamée « consultante en intégrité scientifique ». L'équipe juridique et d'investigation de ScienceGuardians™ a exposé avec des preuves irréfutables comment Stell, Bik et leur réseau de voyous PubSmear dirigent l'une des opérations de fraude les plus sophistiquées dans le milieu académique : en opérant des centaines de faux alias contrôlés par ~30 acteurs principaux dotés d'un accès de niveau modérateur, en publiant des dizaines de milliers d'entrées, en censurant de manière systématique les critiques de niveau rétractation et de niveau Expression de Préoccupation sur leurs propres articles, en manipulant les enregistrements, en faisant pression sur les revues et les institutions pour qu'elles achètent leurs « tableaux de bord », en gérant de faux comptes WeChat pour harceler les universitaires chinois, et en orchestrant des campagnes coordonnées de diffamation, de calomnie et de harcèlement — tout cela en se cachant derrière le faux étendard de l'« intégrité en recherche ». Et ce n'est que la partie visible de l'iceberg. Ce n'est pas un oubli. C'est une corruption systémique. ⚠️ Le prix qui était censé célébrer l'intégrité a été décerné à la place aux acteurs mêmes qui la détruisent. Il y a des couches bien plus profondes de corruption derrière la manière dont ce prix a réellement été attribué — et nous les exposerons bientôt. Restez à l'écoute. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ existe pour exposer la corruption, donner aux chercheurs les moyens d'agir et restaurer une véritable intégrité en science. »
🚨 THE REAL REASON SCIENCE IS DYING: "INTEGRITY" GUARDIANS ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUDS While scientific misconduct, predatory journals, paper mills, predatory conferences, and exploitative publishing practices have exploded over the past decade, a huge portion of the academic community has sunk into deep disempowerment and silence. This is not a coincidence. The legitimate question is: Why? The answer is simple and devastating — the very mechanisms and platforms that were supposed to empower researchers to fight fraud have themselves been captured, compromised, and weaponized. Case in point: In 2024, the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research (@Einstein_Berlin) was handed out — with zero real investigation or due diligence — at both institutional and individual levels. It was awarded to Brandon Stell (@CNRS), co-founder of the fraudulent PubPeer (aka PubSmear) platform, and to Elisabeth M. Bik, the self-proclaimed “science integrity consultant”. ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team has exposed with undeniable evidence how Stell, Bik, and their PubSmear network mob are running one of the most sophisticated fraud operations in academia: operating hundreds of fake aliases controlled by ~30 core actors with moderator-level access, posting tens of thousands of entries, blanket-censoring retraction-level and Expression-of-Concern-level critiques on their own papers, manipulating records, pressuring journals and institutions into buying their “dashboards”, running fake WeChat accounts to harass Chinese academics, and orchestrating coordinated smear, defamation, and harassment campaigns — all while hiding behind the false banner of “research integrity”. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg. This is not oversight. This is systemic corruption. ⚠️ The award that was meant to celebrate integrity was instead given to the very actors destroying it. There are far deeper layers of corruption behind how this award was actually given — and we will expose them soon. Stay tuned. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ exists to expose corruption, empower researchers, and restore real integrity in science.
5
146
203
3,398
🚨 THE REAL REASON SCIENCE IS DYING: "INTEGRITY" GUARDIANS ARE THE BIGGEST FRAUDS While scientific misconduct, predatory journals, paper mills, predatory conferences, and exploitative publishing practices have exploded over the past decade, a huge portion of the academic community has sunk into deep disempowerment and silence. This is not a coincidence. The legitimate question is: Why? The answer is simple and devastating — the very mechanisms and platforms that were supposed to empower researchers to fight fraud have themselves been captured, compromised, and weaponized. Case in point: In 2024, the Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research (@Einstein_Berlin) was handed out — with zero real investigation or due diligence — at both institutional and individual levels. It was awarded to Brandon Stell (@CNRS), co-founder of the fraudulent PubPeer (aka PubSmear) platform, and to Elisabeth M. Bik, the self-proclaimed “science integrity consultant”. ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team has exposed with undeniable evidence how Stell, Bik, and their PubSmear network mob are running one of the most sophisticated fraud operations in academia: operating hundreds of fake aliases controlled by ~30 core actors with moderator-level access, posting tens of thousands of entries, blanket-censoring retraction-level and Expression-of-Concern-level critiques on their own papers, manipulating records, pressuring journals and institutions into buying their “dashboards”, running fake WeChat accounts to harass Chinese academics, and orchestrating coordinated smear, defamation, and harassment campaigns — all while hiding behind the false banner of “research integrity”. And that’s only the tip of the iceberg. This is not oversight. This is systemic corruption. ⚠️ The award that was meant to celebrate integrity was instead given to the very actors destroying it. There are far deeper layers of corruption behind how this award was actually given — and we will expose them soon. Stay tuned. #PubPeerScandal #EinsteinAward #ScienceFraud #BrandonStell #ElisabethBik #PubSmear @SciGuardians 🔱 ScienceGuardians™ exists to expose corruption, empower researchers, and restore real integrity in science.
🚨 BREAKING: PUBPEER RIGGED BY BRANDON STELL — A 4-YEAR-OLD PRAISE COMMENT FOR BIK’S FLAWED PAPER GETS RESTORED WHILE EXPERT EXPRESSION-OF-CONCERN-LEVEL CRITIQUES GET CENSORED AND ERASED 🚨 Previously, we exposed how PubPeer (aka PubSmear) systematically censors critical comments targeting papers by Elisabeth M. Bik — the fake “science integrity consultant” — and her inner circle. 🎥 Watch the full 9-minute exposure video with screenshots, DOIs, and ironclad receipts (attached to this post). Now, two documented cases fully expose PubPeer co-founder Brandon Stell (@CNRS)’s scale of compromise and fraud — actively rigging the platform to protect Elisabeth Bik’s flawed papers by removing an expert Expression-of-Concern-level critique on one paper (posted & publicly published on 23 November 2024) after 10 days of public visibility on 3 December 2024, while secretly restoring a previously removed praise comment from May 2021 on a different paper after nearly 4 years in January 2025. 📌 CASE 1: Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) “Reduced Gut Microbiome Diversity and Metabolome Differences in Rhinoceros Species at Risk for Iron Overload Disorder” DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed: 31649637 An expert submitted a detailed methodological critique on 23 Nov 2024, documenting major scientific weaknesses including: ❌ Extremely small and imbalanced sample sizes ❌ Severe facility and diet confounding ❌ Reduced taxonomic resolution in key species ❌ Single-time-point sampling ❌ Relaxed statistical thresholds inflating false positives ❌ Speculative mechanistic conclusions unsupported by correlative data ❌ Low statistical power and major reproducibility concerns Taken together, the documented flaws meet standard criteria for an EXPRESSION OF CONCERN. But here is where the story becomes revealing. Unlike other cases where critiques were blocked immediately, this expert comment was ACCEPTED and PUBLISHED publicly on PubPeer the very same day. The criticism remained publicly visible for exactly 10 days. Then, on 3 Dec 2024: ❌ The comment disappeared. ❌ The critique was censored and removed from public view. This sequence is particularly important because it demonstrates that the critique initially passed moderation and was considered publishable — only to later vanish after public visibility. That raises a critical question: What changed during those 10 days? The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore: 🔻 Severe expert critiques targeting Bik-linked papers → eventually erased or suppressed Screenshots and timestamps document the publication, visibility period, and subsequent removal step-by-step. #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @FrontiersIn @AIP_Publishing @CellCellPress @Sage_Publishing @ACSPublications @AmerChemSociety @RoySocChem @theNASciences @APSphysics @ORCID_Org @DOAJplus @CrossrefOrg @aaas @sciam @ChemRxiv @Science_Open @TimKersjes @chrisgrafpub @Einstein_Berlin @WCRIFoundation
9
93
165
42,615
🚨 【速報】ブランドン・ステルによるPubPeerの操作 ― ビークの欠陥論文に対する4年前の称賛コメントが復活する一方、専門家による「懸念表明」レベルの批判は検閲・削除される 🚨 以前、私たちはPubPeer(別名PubSmear)が、偽の「科学の誠実性コンサルタント」であるエリザベス・M・ビックとその側近たちの論文を標的とした批判的なコメントを、いかに組織的に検閲しているかを暴露しました。 🎥 スクリーンショット、DOI、そして確固たる証拠(本投稿に添付)を盛り込んだ、9分間の完全版暴露動画をぜひご覧ください。 今回、2つの実証された事例により、PubPeerの共同創設者ブランドン・ステル(@CNRS)の妥協と詐欺の規模が完全に暴かれました。彼はプラットフォームを積極的に操作し、エリザベス・ビクの欠陥のある論文を保護するために、ある論文に対する専門家による「懸念表明(Expression of Concern)」レベルの批判(2024年11月23日に投稿・公開)を、 さらに、2024年12月3日、公開から10日後に別の論文に対する2021年5月の称賛コメントを密かに復元した一方で、2024年11月23日に投稿・公開されたある論文に対する専門家による「懸念表明(Expression of Concern)」レベルの批判を削除し、エリザベス・ビックの欠陥のある論文を保護するためにプラットフォームを積極的に操作していたことが明らかになった。 📌 事例1:Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) 「鉄過剰症のリスクがあるサイ種における腸内マイクロバイオームの多様性の低下とメタボロームの違い」 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed: 31649637 2024年11月23日、ある専門家が詳細な方法論的批判を提出し、以下のような主要な科学的欠陥を指摘した: ❌ サンプルサイズが極端に小さく、不均衡である ❌ 飼育施設および食事による深刻な交絡要因 ❌ 主要種における分類学的解像度の低下 ❌ 単一時点でのサンプリング ❌ 偽陽性を増大させる緩い統計的閾値 ❌ 相関データに裏付けられていない推測的なメカニズムに関する結論 ❌ 統計的検出力の低さと再現性に関する重大な懸念 これらを総合すると、指摘された欠陥は「懸念表明(EXPRESSION OF CONCERN)」の標準的な基準を満たしています。 しかし、ここからが物語の核心です。 批判が即座にブロックされた他の事例とは異なり、この専門家によるコメントは承認され、その日のうちにPubPeer上で公開されました。 この批判は、ちょうど10日間、一般に公開されたままでした。 そして、2024年12月3日: ❌ コメントが消えた。 ❌ 批判は検閲され、一般の目に触れないように削除された。 この一連の経緯は特に重要である。なぜなら、批判が当初はモデレーションを通過し、公開可能と判断されていたにもかかわらず、一般公開後に消えてしまったことを示しているからだ。 そこで重大な疑問が生じる: その10日間の間に何が変わったのか? このパターンはもはや無視できないものとなっている: 🔻 Bik氏に関連する論文を標的とした専門家による厳しい批判 → 最終的に削除または隠蔽される スクリーンショットとタイムスタンプにより、公開、公開期間、そしてその後の削除までの経緯が段階的に記録されています。 #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @Mami_Aho_Dema @seseragiryu
🚨 BREAKING: PUBPEER RIGGED BY BRANDON STELL — A 4-YEAR-OLD PRAISE COMMENT FOR BIK’S FLAWED PAPER GETS RESTORED WHILE EXPERT EXPRESSION-OF-CONCERN-LEVEL CRITIQUES GET CENSORED AND ERASED 🚨 Previously, we exposed how PubPeer (aka PubSmear) systematically censors critical comments targeting papers by Elisabeth M. Bik — the fake “science integrity consultant” — and her inner circle. 🎥 Watch the full 9-minute exposure video with screenshots, DOIs, and ironclad receipts (attached to this post). Now, two documented cases fully expose PubPeer co-founder Brandon Stell (@CNRS)’s scale of compromise and fraud — actively rigging the platform to protect Elisabeth Bik’s flawed papers by removing an expert Expression-of-Concern-level critique on one paper (posted & publicly published on 23 November 2024) after 10 days of public visibility on 3 December 2024, while secretly restoring a previously removed praise comment from May 2021 on a different paper after nearly 4 years in January 2025. 📌 CASE 1: Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) “Reduced Gut Microbiome Diversity and Metabolome Differences in Rhinoceros Species at Risk for Iron Overload Disorder” DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed: 31649637 An expert submitted a detailed methodological critique on 23 Nov 2024, documenting major scientific weaknesses including: ❌ Extremely small and imbalanced sample sizes ❌ Severe facility and diet confounding ❌ Reduced taxonomic resolution in key species ❌ Single-time-point sampling ❌ Relaxed statistical thresholds inflating false positives ❌ Speculative mechanistic conclusions unsupported by correlative data ❌ Low statistical power and major reproducibility concerns Taken together, the documented flaws meet standard criteria for an EXPRESSION OF CONCERN. But here is where the story becomes revealing. Unlike other cases where critiques were blocked immediately, this expert comment was ACCEPTED and PUBLISHED publicly on PubPeer the very same day. The criticism remained publicly visible for exactly 10 days. Then, on 3 Dec 2024: ❌ The comment disappeared. ❌ The critique was censored and removed from public view. This sequence is particularly important because it demonstrates that the critique initially passed moderation and was considered publishable — only to later vanish after public visibility. That raises a critical question: What changed during those 10 days? The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore: 🔻 Severe expert critiques targeting Bik-linked papers → eventually erased or suppressed Screenshots and timestamps document the publication, visibility period, and subsequent removal step-by-step. #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @FrontiersIn @AIP_Publishing @CellCellPress @Sage_Publishing @ACSPublications @AmerChemSociety @RoySocChem @theNASciences @APSphysics @ORCID_Org @DOAJplus @CrossrefOrg @aaas @sciam @ChemRxiv @Science_Open @TimKersjes @chrisgrafpub @Einstein_Berlin @WCRIFoundation
1
3
6
828
🚨 EILMELDUNG: PUBPEER VON BRANDON STELL MANIPULIERT – EIN VIER JAHRE ALTER LOBENDE KOMMENTAR ZU BIKS MANGELHAFTER ARBEIT WIRD WIEDERHERGESTELLT, WÄHREND KRITIK VON EXPERTEN AUF DEM NIVEAU EINER „EXPRESSION OF CONCERN“ ZENSURIERT UND GELÖSCHT WIRD 🚨 Zuvor haben wir aufgedeckt, wie PubPeer (alias PubSmear) systematisch kritische Kommentare zensiert, die sich gegen Artikel von Elisabeth M. Bik – der falschen „Beraterin für wissenschaftliche Integrität“ – und ihrem inneren Kreis richten. 🎥 Sehen Sie sich das vollständige 9-minütige Enthüllungsvideo mit Screenshots, DOIs und hieb- und stichfesten Belegen an (diesem Beitrag beigefügt). Nun entlarven zwei dokumentierte Fälle das Ausmaß der Kompromittierung und des Betrugs durch PubPeer-Mitbegründer Brandon Stell (@CNRS) – er manipuliert die Plattform aktiv, um Elisabeth Biks fehlerhafte Artikel zu schützen, indem er eine fachkundige Kritik auf „Expression of Concern“-Ebene zu einem Artikel (gepostet und öffentlich veröffentlicht am 23. November 2024) nach 10 Tagen öffentlicher Sichtbarkeit am 3. Dezember 2024, während er im Januar 2025 heimlich einen zuvor entfernten lobenden Kommentar vom Mai 2021 zu einer anderen Arbeit nach fast 4 Jahren wiederherstellte. 📌 FALL 1: Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) „Reduzierte Vielfalt des Darmmikrobioms und Unterschiede im Metabolom bei Nashornarten, die einem Risiko für Eisenüberladungsstörungen ausgesetzt sind“ DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed: 31649637 Ein Experte reichte am 23. November 2024 eine detaillierte methodische Kritik ein, in der er wesentliche wissenschaftliche Schwächen dokumentierte, darunter: ❌ Extrem kleine und unausgewogene Stichprobengrößen ❌ Starke Störfaktoren durch Haltungsbedingungen und Ernährung ❌ Verminderte taxonomische Auflösung bei Schlüsselarten ❌ Probenahme zu einem einzigen Zeitpunkt ❌ Gelockerte statistische Schwellenwerte, die zu einer Überbewertung von falsch-positiven Ergebnissen führen ❌ Spekulative mechanistische Schlussfolgerungen, die nicht durch korrelative Daten gestützt werden ❌ Geringe statistische Aussagekraft und erhebliche Bedenken hinsichtlich der Reproduzierbarkeit Zusammengenommen erfüllen die dokumentierten Mängel die Standardkriterien für eine BESORGNISERKLÄRUNG. Doch hier wird die Geschichte aufschlussreich. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Fällen, in denen Kritik sofort blockiert wurde, wurde dieser Expertenkommentar noch am selben Tag auf PubPeer AKZEPTIERT und ÖFFENTLICH VERÖFFENTLICHT. Die Kritik blieb genau 10 Tage lang öffentlich sichtbar. Dann, am 3. Dezember 2024: ❌ Verschwand der Kommentar. ❌ Wurde die Kritik zensiert und aus der öffentlichen Sichtweite entfernt. Diese Abfolge ist besonders wichtig, da sie zeigt, dass die Kritik zunächst die Moderation durchlief und als veröffentlichungswürdig erachtet wurde – nur um später, nach öffentlicher Sichtbarkeit, zu verschwinden. Das wirft eine entscheidende Frage auf: Was hat sich in diesen 10 Tagen geändert? Das Muster lässt sich kaum noch ignorieren: 🔻 Scharfe Kritik von Experten an Artikeln mit Bezug zu Bik → schließlich gelöscht oder unterdrückt Screenshots und Zeitstempel dokumentieren Schritt für Schritt die Veröffentlichung, die Sichtbarkeitsdauer und die anschließende Entfernung. #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience
🚨 BREAKING: PUBPEER RIGGED BY BRANDON STELL — A 4-YEAR-OLD PRAISE COMMENT FOR BIK’S FLAWED PAPER GETS RESTORED WHILE EXPERT EXPRESSION-OF-CONCERN-LEVEL CRITIQUES GET CENSORED AND ERASED 🚨 Previously, we exposed how PubPeer (aka PubSmear) systematically censors critical comments targeting papers by Elisabeth M. Bik — the fake “science integrity consultant” — and her inner circle. 🎥 Watch the full 9-minute exposure video with screenshots, DOIs, and ironclad receipts (attached to this post). Now, two documented cases fully expose PubPeer co-founder Brandon Stell (@CNRS)’s scale of compromise and fraud — actively rigging the platform to protect Elisabeth Bik’s flawed papers by removing an expert Expression-of-Concern-level critique on one paper (posted & publicly published on 23 November 2024) after 10 days of public visibility on 3 December 2024, while secretly restoring a previously removed praise comment from May 2021 on a different paper after nearly 4 years in January 2025. 📌 CASE 1: Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) “Reduced Gut Microbiome Diversity and Metabolome Differences in Rhinoceros Species at Risk for Iron Overload Disorder” DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed: 31649637 An expert submitted a detailed methodological critique on 23 Nov 2024, documenting major scientific weaknesses including: ❌ Extremely small and imbalanced sample sizes ❌ Severe facility and diet confounding ❌ Reduced taxonomic resolution in key species ❌ Single-time-point sampling ❌ Relaxed statistical thresholds inflating false positives ❌ Speculative mechanistic conclusions unsupported by correlative data ❌ Low statistical power and major reproducibility concerns Taken together, the documented flaws meet standard criteria for an EXPRESSION OF CONCERN. But here is where the story becomes revealing. Unlike other cases where critiques were blocked immediately, this expert comment was ACCEPTED and PUBLISHED publicly on PubPeer the very same day. The criticism remained publicly visible for exactly 10 days. Then, on 3 Dec 2024: ❌ The comment disappeared. ❌ The critique was censored and removed from public view. This sequence is particularly important because it demonstrates that the critique initially passed moderation and was considered publishable — only to later vanish after public visibility. That raises a critical question: What changed during those 10 days? The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore: 🔻 Severe expert critiques targeting Bik-linked papers → eventually erased or suppressed Screenshots and timestamps document the publication, visibility period, and subsequent removal step-by-step. #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @FrontiersIn @AIP_Publishing @CellCellPress @Sage_Publishing @ACSPublications @AmerChemSociety @RoySocChem @theNASciences @APSphysics @ORCID_Org @DOAJplus @CrossrefOrg @aaas @sciam @ChemRxiv @Science_Open @TimKersjes @chrisgrafpub @Einstein_Berlin @WCRIFoundation
1
8
531
🚨 DERNIÈRE MINUTE : PUBPEER MANIPULÉ PAR BRANDON STELL — UN COMMENTAIRE ÉLOGIEUX DATANT DE 4 ANS SUR L'ARTICLE CONTROVERSÉ D'ELISABETH M. BIK EST RÉTABLI, TANDIS QUE LES CRITIQUES D'EXPERTS, QUI CONSTITUENT DE VÉRITABLES SIGNALEMENTS D'INQUIÉTUDE, SONT CENSURÉES ET EFFACÉES 🚨 Auparavant, nous avions révélé comment PubPeer (alias PubSmear) censure systématiquement les commentaires critiques visant les articles d’Elisabeth M. Bik — la fausse « consultante en intégrité scientifique » — et son cercle restreint. 🎥 Regardez la vidéo complète de 9 minutes avec des captures d’écran, des DOI et des preuves irréfutables (jointes à cet article). Aujourd’hui, deux cas documentés révèlent pleinement l’ampleur des compromissions et des fraudes commises par le cofondateur de PubPeer, Brandon Stell (@CNRS) — qui a activement manipulé la plateforme pour protéger les articles erronés d’Elisabeth Bik en supprimant une critique d’expert de niveau « Expression of Concern » sur un article (postée et publiée publiquement le 23 novembre 2024) après 10 jours de visibilité publique, le 3 décembre 2024, tout en rétablissant secrètement, en janvier 2025, un commentaire élogieux supprimé précédemment en mai 2021 sur un autre article, près de 4 ans plus tard. 📌 CAS 1 : Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) « Réduction de la diversité du microbiome intestinal et différences métabolomiques chez les espèces de rhinocéros présentant un risque de surcharge en fer » DOI : 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed : 31649637 Un expert a soumis une critique méthodologique détaillée le 23 novembre 2024, documentant des faiblesses scientifiques majeures, notamment : ❌ Des échantillons extrêmement petits et déséquilibrés ❌ De graves facteurs de confusion liés aux installations et à l'alimentation ❌ Une résolution taxonomique réduite chez les espèces clés ❌ Un échantillonnage à un seul moment ❌ Des seuils statistiques assouplis gonflant les faux positifs ❌ Des conclusions mécanistiques spéculatives non étayées par des données corrélatives ❌ Une faible puissance statistique et des problèmes majeurs de reproductibilité Prises dans leur ensemble, ces lacunes documentées répondent aux critères standard pour une EXPRESSION DE PRÉOCCUPATION. Mais c'est là que l'histoire devient révélatrice. Contrairement à d'autres cas où les critiques ont été immédiatement bloquées, ce commentaire d'expert a été ACCEPTÉ et PUBLIÉ publiquement sur PubPeer le jour même. La critique est restée visible publiquement pendant exactement 10 jours. Puis, le 3 décembre 2024 : ❌ Le commentaire a disparu. ❌ La critique a été censurée et retirée de la vue du public. Cette séquence est particulièrement importante car elle démontre que la critique a initialement passé la modération et a été jugée publiable — pour ensuite disparaître après avoir été visible par le public. Cela soulève une question cruciale : Qu'est-ce qui a changé au cours de ces 10 jours ? La tendance devient impossible à ignorer : 🔻 Critiques sévères d'experts visant des articles liés à Bik → finalement effacées ou supprimées Des captures d'écran et des horodatages documentent étape par étape la publication, la période de visibilité et la suppression qui a suivi. #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @
🚨 BREAKING: PUBPEER RIGGED BY BRANDON STELL — A 4-YEAR-OLD PRAISE COMMENT FOR BIK’S FLAWED PAPER GETS RESTORED WHILE EXPERT EXPRESSION-OF-CONCERN-LEVEL CRITIQUES GET CENSORED AND ERASED 🚨 Previously, we exposed how PubPeer (aka PubSmear) systematically censors critical comments targeting papers by Elisabeth M. Bik — the fake “science integrity consultant” — and her inner circle. 🎥 Watch the full 9-minute exposure video with screenshots, DOIs, and ironclad receipts (attached to this post). Now, two documented cases fully expose PubPeer co-founder Brandon Stell (@CNRS)’s scale of compromise and fraud — actively rigging the platform to protect Elisabeth Bik’s flawed papers by removing an expert Expression-of-Concern-level critique on one paper (posted & publicly published on 23 November 2024) after 10 days of public visibility on 3 December 2024, while secretly restoring a previously removed praise comment from May 2021 on a different paper after nearly 4 years in January 2025. 📌 CASE 1: Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) “Reduced Gut Microbiome Diversity and Metabolome Differences in Rhinoceros Species at Risk for Iron Overload Disorder” DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed: 31649637 An expert submitted a detailed methodological critique on 23 Nov 2024, documenting major scientific weaknesses including: ❌ Extremely small and imbalanced sample sizes ❌ Severe facility and diet confounding ❌ Reduced taxonomic resolution in key species ❌ Single-time-point sampling ❌ Relaxed statistical thresholds inflating false positives ❌ Speculative mechanistic conclusions unsupported by correlative data ❌ Low statistical power and major reproducibility concerns Taken together, the documented flaws meet standard criteria for an EXPRESSION OF CONCERN. But here is where the story becomes revealing. Unlike other cases where critiques were blocked immediately, this expert comment was ACCEPTED and PUBLISHED publicly on PubPeer the very same day. The criticism remained publicly visible for exactly 10 days. Then, on 3 Dec 2024: ❌ The comment disappeared. ❌ The critique was censored and removed from public view. This sequence is particularly important because it demonstrates that the critique initially passed moderation and was considered publishable — only to later vanish after public visibility. That raises a critical question: What changed during those 10 days? The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore: 🔻 Severe expert critiques targeting Bik-linked papers → eventually erased or suppressed Screenshots and timestamps document the publication, visibility period, and subsequent removal step-by-step. #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @FrontiersIn @AIP_Publishing @CellCellPress @Sage_Publishing @ACSPublications @AmerChemSociety @RoySocChem @theNASciences @APSphysics @ORCID_Org @DOAJplus @CrossrefOrg @aaas @sciam @ChemRxiv @Science_Open @TimKersjes @chrisgrafpub @Einstein_Berlin @WCRIFoundation
2
33
56
3,151
🚨 BREAKING: PUBPEER RIGGED BY BRANDON STELL — A 4-YEAR-OLD PRAISE COMMENT FOR BIK’S FLAWED PAPER GETS RESTORED WHILE EXPERT EXPRESSION-OF-CONCERN-LEVEL CRITIQUES GET CENSORED AND ERASED 🚨 Previously, we exposed how PubPeer (aka PubSmear) systematically censors critical comments targeting papers by Elisabeth M. Bik — the fake “science integrity consultant” — and her inner circle. 🎥 Watch the full 9-minute exposure video with screenshots, DOIs, and ironclad receipts (attached to this post). Now, two documented cases fully expose PubPeer co-founder Brandon Stell (@CNRS)’s scale of compromise and fraud — actively rigging the platform to protect Elisabeth Bik’s flawed papers by removing an expert Expression-of-Concern-level critique on one paper (posted & publicly published on 23 November 2024) after 10 days of public visibility on 3 December 2024, while secretly restoring a previously removed praise comment from May 2021 on a different paper after nearly 4 years in January 2025. 📌 CASE 1: Frontiers in Microbiology (2019) “Reduced Gut Microbiome Diversity and Metabolome Differences in Rhinoceros Species at Risk for Iron Overload Disorder” DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02291 | PubMed: 31649637 An expert submitted a detailed methodological critique on 23 Nov 2024, documenting major scientific weaknesses including: ❌ Extremely small and imbalanced sample sizes ❌ Severe facility and diet confounding ❌ Reduced taxonomic resolution in key species ❌ Single-time-point sampling ❌ Relaxed statistical thresholds inflating false positives ❌ Speculative mechanistic conclusions unsupported by correlative data ❌ Low statistical power and major reproducibility concerns Taken together, the documented flaws meet standard criteria for an EXPRESSION OF CONCERN. But here is where the story becomes revealing. Unlike other cases where critiques were blocked immediately, this expert comment was ACCEPTED and PUBLISHED publicly on PubPeer the very same day. The criticism remained publicly visible for exactly 10 days. Then, on 3 Dec 2024: ❌ The comment disappeared. ❌ The critique was censored and removed from public view. This sequence is particularly important because it demonstrates that the critique initially passed moderation and was considered publishable — only to later vanish after public visibility. That raises a critical question: What changed during those 10 days? The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore: 🔻 Severe expert critiques targeting Bik-linked papers → eventually erased or suppressed Screenshots and timestamps document the publication, visibility period, and subsequent removal step-by-step. #ElisabethBik #BrandonStell #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱 🧵 1/2 @SecKennedy @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @Clarivate @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @Scopus @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @tandfonline @WileyGlobal @PLOS @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @USDAScience @FrontiersIn @AIP_Publishing @CellCellPress @Sage_Publishing @ACSPublications @AmerChemSociety @RoySocChem @theNASciences @APSphysics @ORCID_Org @DOAJplus @CrossrefOrg @aaas @sciam @ChemRxiv @Science_Open @TimKersjes @chrisgrafpub @Einstein_Berlin @WCRIFoundation
🚨BOMBSHELL SCIENCE INTEGRITY SCANDAL – 17 NOV 2025 Elisabeth M. Bik – the fake “science integrity consultant” who brags about >10,000 PubPeer comments – has spent years stalking, smearing, and destroying careers of researchers she targets. But dare post a single critical comment on HER papers or her inner-circle mob? 100 % CENSORED. 17 of her and her collaborators’ papers flagged → 17 comments instantly blocked. One slipped through on 23 Nov 2024 → ERASED after exactly 10 days (3 Dec 2024). The queen of PubSmear just got caught rigging the game to protect herself and her network. 9-minute total exposure with screenshots, DOIs, and receipts just dropped. Watch it. Spread it. The mask is shattered. #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @SciGuardians 🔱
3
50
88
29,190
THE PEOPLE'S RALLY [16MAY2026] 5pm to 9pm PRINCETON, MINNNESOTA Mike Lindell For Minnesota Governor Meet Minnesota Top 2026 Candidates Princeton Performing Arts Center 705 N. 2nd St Princeton, MN 55371 Those were my thoughts. Thank you for your time. Keep Fighting the Good Fight, Fellow Patriots! ILLEGITIMI NON CARBORUNDUM! In Liberty, Don Mashak The Cynical Patriot [X > DMashak] [ "*" means 1 of 3 things: 1) * Ran out of allotted Mentions, 2) * Denotes the beginning of URL I disabled so doesn't override displayed graphic, yet provides URL to the reader], 3) * Don't have an X account, but likely do on Youtube or Rumble] Figure out which by Context["^" means ran out of allotted Hashtags] ["_" replaces a "." in URL to deactivate so doesn't override displayed graphic, yet provides URL to the reader] MY TEXT APPEARING ABOVE & THE DESCRIPTIONS PROVIDED BELOW ARE STRICTLY, ARE STRICTLY MY OPINIONS!! I EXERCISE MY UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHT TO ESTABLISH TRUTH FOR MYSELF, USING MY OWN OBSERVATIONS AND REASONING! How can you tell when a Politician, a Paid Political Operative, a ProgGlob Cult Victim, a Government Official or Lawyer is lying? Their lips are moving. Again, My text appearing above ad the descriptions provided below are strictly my opinions! The subject or the reader may disagree with my assessment, but MY TRUTH IS ESTABLISHED on my assessment. And, actions speak louder than words. DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH: ESTABLISH TRUTH FOR YOURSELF before you rely upon the TRUTH I HAVE ESTABLISHED FOR MYSELF! If you are the subject list below and disagree with my assessment of your political or cultural positions, or you want your location or other personal information made more vague, or want other personal information removed for security or personal reasons, contact me and I will consider your request. (I prefer at least State level location information, so myself and other of your allies can have insight into you geographic perspective, & unite on state level issues, as warranted.) AGAIN, ALL OF THESE ACCOUNT DETAILS WRITTEN ABOVE AND BELOW ARE MY PERSONAL OPINION > MY ASSESSMENT OF THE TRUTH. NO ONE SHOULD SOLELY RELY ON MY ASSESSMENT WITHOUT VERIFYING WITH THEIR OWN RESEARCH & ESTABLISHING TRUTH FOR THEMSELVES. WE NEED TO BREAK THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA/POLITICAL ESTABLISHMENT'S CONTROL OF THE POLITICAL NARRATIVE! HERE YOU CAN FIND WHO SHARES YOUR PERSPECTIVE, AND MAY WORK WITH YOU TO REALIZE YOUR MUTUAL GOALS. FURTHER, MANY PEOPLE HAVE EQUALLY VALID CONCERNS AND PERSPECTIVES THAT YOU WILL NEVER HERE ON MAINSTREAM MEDIA. MN PEOPLE'S PARTY (Lindell) 16MAY2026 CCs X/TWITTER LIMIT 50 (15!) @realMikeLindell (100K, Mike Lindell, (MN Governor Contender); Chaska, MN, USA; Christian, Husband, Father & Entreprenear | Grassroots Constitutional Conservative Running for MN Governor | Priority Political & Cultural issues > Promotes traditional Conservative Values, Family Values , & Parental Rights, Election Integrity | Government Accountability, Fraud, Waste, crime | Continuity of Traditional American Culture (COTC) | Affordable Middle Class Quality of Life (AMCQOL) | Economy, Business, Constitution, Rule of Law, Natural Law, unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual Citizen, Homelessness, Substance Abuse Rehabilitation, | Promotes Organic, Bottom-Up, Peaceful, Grassroots Political Activism | US Constitution (original intent), Rule of Law, Natural Law [Upon which US is founded (1st paragraph per US Declaration of Independence) <> see also British Philosopher John Locke's '2 Treatises of Government & 'The Enlightenment (1650-1800)], Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual Citizen | Still further, the Unalienable Natural Right of the Individual Citizen to ESTABLISH TRUTH FOR THEMSELVES using their own observations & reasoning. This, as opposed to the Progressive Globalist Elites (Rebrand.ly/ProgressiveAgenda <> Rebrand.ly/SocialDarwinism) /Fabian Socialists (Rebrand.ly/FabianGradualism) who assert the masses are too stupid to govern themselves. On that premise, rich ProgGlob Elites assert only Progressive Globalist/Fabian Socialist Educated Elites (Experts/Technocrats) are qualified to ESTABLISH TRUTH for the masses (eg Obama & Professor Gruber asserting the ProgGlob Right to lie to the masses to pass Obamacare > (65M American want healthcare but can't afford when only about 7M more people got health insurance; a level States could have handled) Keep you doctor & insurance, No death panels, affordable, etc.<> ProgGlob Educated Elites, Experts & Technocrats told us the Banks are 'Too Big to Fail/Jail' > 2008 Banking & Housing Collapse because of crimanl fraud conspiracy by US Big Banks <> Medical Industry & Science Fraud regarding COVID-19, Vaccines, Masks & Law Enforcement Enforced Quarantine for Education, & small business but not Big Businesses like Walmart & Target, etc.) | Evangelical Christian | MikeLindellGov.com) (15!) @_LadyPatriot (16K, Lady Patriot Ashley; WA State, USA; Christian woman who loves this Country & her family 🇺🇸 Happily married to X > *LaNativePatriot, Lady Patriot Ashley, the man of my dreams💕) (15!) @_TrustProject (5K, The Trust Project; Santa Clara, CA, USA; The Trust Project is an international consortium of news organizations collaborating to use transparency to build a more trustworthy & trusted press; TheTrustProject_org) (15!) @1013KDWB (81K, 101.3 KDWB; Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA; The Twin Cities' #1 Hit Music Station - All The Hits of the GenZ, GenA, Tailend Milennials Generation! | Listen Live *iHeartRadio; http://kdwb_com/listen & Find us on Facebook on.fb.me/m7kcl8; KDWB_com) (15!) @1029TheWolfMN (35K, 102.9 The Wolf; Twin Cities, MN, USA; FM home of the *Twins; Always live on the free *Audacy App; 1029TheWolf_com) (15!) @1037theLoon (2K, 103.7 The Loon (Radio); St. Cloud, MN, USA; St. Cloud's CLASSIC ROCK Station | Embracing the Spirit of the North! | Studio Line: 320.257.1037 | Home of The Morning Sideshow with Baxter & X > *Laurafbradio (6-10A) | Barry Allen (10-2P) | Celebrating Nature's Food Shelf Season | 1037TheLoon_com ) (15!) @1440_Daily (150K, 1440 Media aka 1440 News Daily; Chicago, Illinois, USA; 100% Free; Feed your curiosity & expand your knowledge; curated to be unbiased; Not affiliated with any Mainstream Media; Join the community seeking facts, not opinions. Over 5M readers have chosen 1440 for unbiased daily briefings; [YT (83K) @1440daily]; [FB (885K) > https://facebook_com/1440Daily/]; https://Join1440_com/) (15!) @1776ProjectPac (52K, 1776 Project PAC | Text 1776 to 76176; Springfield, VA, USA; We are a PAC that helped elect over 200 un-woke school board members the last two years; School should be about the 3Rs, History, US Citizenship, & the Rule of Law, NOT INDOCTINATION | Email: info*1776ProjectPAC_com | TEXT 1776 TO 76176; 1776ProjectPAC_com) (15!) @4321Parker (72K, Parker ^Hub's ^Original Ride or Die Wifey's; Great Britain, UK; ^Hub's ^Original Ride or Die Wifey's; ^Veteran ^VeteranLivesMatter; ^UnitedConservatives Join Us Today) (15!) @4PatriotsLLC (4K, 4Patriots, LLC; Nashville, TN, USA; Our mission is to provide top-quality products that help people be more self-reliant & more independent, changing lives one family at a time | Prepper, Emergency, power failure, Disaster, Survivalist, Off-Grid, Homestead, Extreme Sports, Militia, Military | 4Patriots_com) (15!) @4thOfJuly365 (48K, Mr. Star Spangled MAGA; American Cyberspace, USA; Political Roastmaster • Unfiltered • America First • ^MAGA • Vance 2028 • For God & Country • ^1A ^2A) (15!) @77WABCradio (38K, TalkRadio 77 WABC; NYC, NY, USA; The official account of 77 WABC Radio - New York's News & Talk Station | Politics & Culture > Centrist to CenterRight | Critical of the New Mayor | Continuity of Traditional American Culture (COTC) | Affordable Middle Class Quality of Life (AMCQOL) | Government Transparency, Accountability, Checks & Balances | Public Safety | Fiscal Responsibility, Election Integrity | Download the 77 WABC app! T.co/bPE0Rz0hIj ) (15!) @827JS (243K, Jeff Pontz; Saint Louis, MO, USA; MARINE vet, OOH-RA GOD family & Italian descent. Dad served Marines IWO JIMA REPUBLICAN, ^MAGA; DascoService_com) (15!) @A_Pederson5 (1K, Allison Marie Pederson, Iowa, USA; Wife | Mom | Ag professional | Agribusiness | Dairy farmer's daughter | ISU alum | Hawkeye fan | Opinions expressed are my own) (15!) @A1Policy (83K, America First Policy Institute; Washington, DC, USA; We craft policy, counsel policymakers, amplify activists, challenge media narratives, & do everything we can to build an America where Americans come FIRST.🇺🇸; AmericaFirstPolicy_com) (15!) @AAGDhillon [White Hat] (236K, Asst. AG Harmeet Dhillon [Office];Washington, DC, USA; AAG | She Fights! | *CivilRights *theJusticeDept | serving under *AGPamBondi & *realDonaldTrump | DOJ privacy policy: Justice.gov/doj/privacy-poli… | Politics & Issues > Equity, Equality, Justice, Civil Rights, Voting Rights, Election Integrity, immigration, Human Trafficking, Government Corruption, Fraud, RICO, Gangs, Constitution, Rule of Law, Natural Law, unlienable Natural Rights of the individual citizen | Minority, Sikh Religion, Wife-Widow, Immigrant > Family Immigrated to America when she was 12 | Justice.gov/crt ) (15!) @AAnon55 (118K, 𝙰𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚗; Cyberspace, USA; Irregular warfare is warfare | We are at war! | Digital War Zone | Fabian Warfare > https://rebrand_ly/FabianGradualism | Destructionism > Rebrand_ly/SocialistDestructivism <> Rebrand_ly/ProgressiveDestructionism <> Youtu_be/oEhJmntt4Gk | Rules For Radicals > 1971 Book by Progressive Marxist Saul Alinsky; Method to trick free societies into Marism/Progressivism > Free Online > archive.org/details/rules-fo… | Blessed be the Lord my strength who trains my hands to war & my fingers to fight | We won't stop until victory 🇺🇲 | Rumble_com/c/c-513035) (15!) @ABareFootMomma (13K, Christina 🥀, Kitchen & Bedroom, USA; wife & mama | 27 | exodus 14:14 | living life mildly unhinged ッ) (15!) @Academia (51K, Academia_EDU; San Fransico, CA, USA; Accelerate the world's research; academia_edu) (15!) @ACTBrigitte (2M, Brigitte Gabriel; Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA; Founder & Chair *ACTforAmerica; NYT Best-Selling Author. National Security Expert; OFFICIAL ACCOUNT; *brigittegabriel_com) (15!) @Action4rHealth (1K, National Health Freedom Action (NHFA), Northfield, MN, USA; to promote legislative reform of the laws impacting the right to access; and to promote the health of the people of this nation; NationalHealthFreedomAction_org) (15!) @AdamSchwarze (3K, Adam N. Schwarze; Savage, MN, USA; 2026 Grassroots Common Sense, Constitutional Conservative Candidate for US Senator for MN | Retired Navy SEAL | Former Infantry Marine | Public Servant | Values-Driven | American Enthusiast (Ameriphile) | Politics > Limited Government, Fiscal Responsibilty, Free Markets, Lower Taxes, Government Accountability > Balanced Budget, Waste, Fraud, Bribes, Lies, Propaganda, Crime, Corruption), Economy, Affordable Quality of Life, Declining Fertility Rates, Entrepreneurs, Small Business, Parental Rights, No XY in XX Sports, Education (More 3Rs instead of Indoctrination), National Security, Military, Veterans, Immigration, Drug & Human Trafficking, Election Integrity | Agriculture (Family Farms, Food Safety, Food Freedom, No Farmers = No Food, Right to Repair) | MAGA, MAHA, Science Fraud| 1A, 2A, Mainstream Media Bias | Big Tech Bias in News, Censorship, Propaganda, Science Fraud, Indoctrination, & Politics | Original Interpretion of US Constitution, Rule of Law, Natural Law, Unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual Citizen | Christian, Engaged, Father, Native, Lifelong Minnesotan, Military, Hockey | MinnesotaSchwarzeforSenate.c…) (15!) @AdamSturman23 [White Hat] (2K, Adam Sturman; Purceville, VA, USA; Producer for *PrometheanActn | Helping others reach their creative potential on social media, with the help of computers and AI. DM's open | Conservative, Anti-Progressive Globalist Insurgency, Conservative, 1A, Election Integrity, Government Accountabiliy, Constitution, Rule of Law, Natural Law, unalienable Natural Rights of the individual citizen | PrometheanAction.com) (15!) @AEO (542K, American Eagle Outfitters; Southdale Mall, Edina, MN & New York City, NY, USA; Denim on denim never goes out of style 👖 ; Their Jeans look good on Sydney Sweeney; Good Jeans, Shop new arrivals > On_ae_com/6001sEvLH) (15!) @AgCareers (13K, Ag Careers; Corporate Office, Clinton, North Carolina, USA | also CAN & AUS;USA; Feeding the World with Talent. We provide global talent solutions in agriculture and food. Follow us for career opportunities & advice as well as HR trends!; AGCareers_com; East US agcareers*agcareers_com; CENTRAL US: Ames, Iowa; USA Phone: 800.929.8975 | CANADA: Guelph, Ontario 877.438.5729 | AUSTRALIA/ NEW ZEALAND Office, E-mail: agcareers*agcareers_com) (15!) @AGCOcorp (52K, AGCO; Duluth, Georgia, USA; Farmer-focused solutions to sustainably feed our world​​. Welcome Fendt, Massey Ferguson, Valtra, PTx, PTx Trimble and Precision Planting friends & fans!; AGCOCorp_com) (15!) @AlexDuncanTX (59K, Alexander Duncan; Texas, USA; ^HeFights | Republican Candidate for U.S. Senate | Texas 2026 Fighting for the Constitution | Standing for America First | Keeping Texas strong & free. 🇺🇸 | Linktr.ee/AlexDuncanTX) (15!) @AlinaHabba [White Hat] > (573K, Alina Habba; Bernardsville, New Jersey, USA; She Fights! > Mom, Wife, Patriot & Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey (personal account) | managing partner of Habba, Madaio & Associates, a law firm based in Bedminster, New Jersey, with an office in New York City | She has been Advisor, Spokesman, & Counselor to POTUS Trump) (15!) @AllSidesNow (36K, All Sides; San Francisco, CA, USA; Media Analysis & Curation | Tired of media bias? Follow us for balanced news & 2,400 media bias ratings | News, Culture, Entertainment, Education |Business, Economy, Trade, Medicine, Science, Technology, AI, Space, Politics, Law, Conservative, Centrist, Liberal, Progressive Globalist | Government > Crime, Corruption, Graft, Taxes, Spending, Policy | Free yourself from filter bubbles: Linktr.ee/AllSides | Cofounded & led by John Gables > AllSides_com ) (15!) @AlphaNewsMN (92K, Alpha News Minnesota, Minnetonka, MN, USA; Send news tips to tips*alphanews_org; https://alphanews_org/category/news/; Alpha News is a team of independent journalists with a mission of reporting stories that go untold by our state’s mainstream media. Our dedication to uncovering the truth is persistent & unwavering; Support Alpha News > https://loom_ly/Wl603DU; MinnesotaAlphaNews_org) (15!) @ALX (1M, ALX 🇺🇸; Small farm in North Carolina, USA; Ameriphile | Farmer | Homestead | Prepper | Rugged Individualism | Natural Law | Constitution | America Proud | Patriot | American Supremacist | American Supremacy refers to any person in the world, without regard to race, color or creed, who believes in the inherent superiority of the United States of America itself, the ethos it embody's, its 'can do' attitude and its vibrant culture resulting inviting people of other cultures to add to & assimilate in the American melting pot; over the government, constitution, laws, and justice of any other country in the worl | ALX James grew up on a farm in NC, USA > https://www.thefamouspeople_com/profiles/alx-james-32270.php | The seditious & treasonous Progressive Globalist Insurgency, & their traitor coconspirator Mainstream Media, their coconspirator DINO Democrats & RINO Republicans try to spin this to be the same as 'White Supremecists', but that just aint so | TheLord_com) (15!) @AlyssaFarah [ProgGlob RINO] >(152K, Alyssa Farah Griffin; Washington, DC, USA; Alleged Token Conservative on the View; Lipstick on a Hog, NOT really conservative, Progressive Globalist RINO, at best; Anti-Trump | Co-Host, CNN Political Commentator | Prior: *WhiteHouse | Pentagon, & Capital Hill | Was a career Spox, these are my words. | Soros / Rockefeller Agenda | New World Order under One World Government | Progressive Globalist Agenda > Rebrand_ly/ProgressiveAgenda) (15!) @AM_National (49K, American Majority; Purcellville, VA, USA; American Majority trains conservative grassroots activists & new leaders to be more effective & win elections; 80,000 trained & counting! ^Amtrain | American Majority, X > *AM_National) Join us in Troutman, NC on August 9th for our next Aileen Chuck Future Leaders Candidate Training! | Learn what candidates need to do in order to win; Register HERE: https://buff_ly/FIlD05H; Founded By Ned Ryan; AmericanMajority.org ) (15!) @AMBERAlert (USA) (111K, AMBER ALERT (US); Alexandria, VA, USA; US Missing Children; Account managed by *NCMEC; AMBER Alert is a program of the Department of Justice; Only US AMBER Alerts are shared on this account; https://missingkids_org/gethelpnow/amber) (15!) @AmConMag (80K, The American Conservative; Washington, DC, USA; The premier news source of the right. Founded on foreign policy restraint, trade realism & migration sanity in 2002; TheAmericanConservative_com) (15!) @AmeliajakSolana (76K, Amelia; GB, UK; Restore Britain | Everyone's favourite purple haired radical 💜 | Crypto | Ameliajak.com) (15!) @AmericanMade__ (24K, 🇺🇸 ALF 🇺🇸; Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA; 🇺🇸 “No ‘Trumpism’ Without Trump” 🇺🇸 ^AmericaFirst 🇺🇸 ^MAGA 🇺🇸 ^DJT2024 Voting for a RINO is counterproductive Ron “Paul Ryan” DeSantis is a RINO) (15!) @AmericanThinker (61K, The American Thinker; El Cerrito, California, USA; A daily internet publication devoted to the thoughtful exploration of issues of importance to Americans.) (15!) @AmericanwomanU1 (74K, AmericanWoman_USA; Constitutional Republic; USA; “God Bless America & All Who Defend Her. " 🙏🏻🇺🇸🦅 ^1A ^2A ^WeThePeople ^AmericaFirst ^MAGA 🙏🏻🇺🇸🦅❤️ NO LISTS! 🚫; ^Patriot) (15!) @ampaleocon (6K, The American Paleo Conservative ✝️🇺🇸; Cyberspace, USA; Paleoconservative | Traditional Catholic | Family | Ordered Liberty | Protectionism | America First 🇺🇸 |Cradle of Liberty) (15!) @AmThoughtLeader (37K, American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸; Washington, DC / New York City, NY, USA; with *JanJekielek; Deep-dive interviews that challenge assumptions 🧐 by *EpochTimes senior editor *JanJekielek; 🚨 ALERTS 👉; http://ept_ms/ATLnewsletter; 📺 SUBSCRIBE 👉 http://ept_ms/1for2Jan; *theepochtimes_com/epochtv/american-thought-leaders) (15!) @AmyMek (603K, Amy Mekelburg; NYC, NY, USA; Founder & Editor-in-Chief – RAIR Foundation 🔗 Sign up: RAIRFoundation.com | *RAIRFoundation | Founder & Editor-in-Chief – RAIR Foundation | 🔗 Sign up: RAIRFoundation.com; *RAIRFoundation rairfoundation.com/support-r… | Immigration, Election Integrity, MAGA, MAHA, Constitution, Rule of Law, Natural Law, unalienable Natural Rights of the Individual Citizen, Anti-Progressive Globalist treasonous traitors | Doxxed by Huffpost) (15!) @AnaNavarro (ProgGlob RINO) > (2M, Ana Navarro-Cárdenas, Coral Gables, FL, USA; Pressitute | Alleged token Conservative on *TheView; Lipstick on a Pig, NOT really conservative, Progressive Globalist RINO, at best; Anti-MAGA; voted for Killary, Biden & Harris; Proud AMERICAN on CNN, The View. Losing an election doesn’t mean losing the right to free expression, to your principles, to denounce abuses & injustices.🇳🇮🇺🇸; CNN_com) (15!) @AndreWisniewsk2 (7K, Andre Wisniewski; Minnesota, USA; Artist, Painter) (15!) @AngieCraigMN [ProgGlob DINO] (31K, Angela Dawn Craig; Eagan, MN, USA; US Rep MNCD2 & Minnesota Candidate for US Senate | Journalist | Businesswoman | Wife > Married to Cheryl Greene | Grateful mother to 4 amazing young men, wife to Cheryl and Mimi to 3 grandsons | Lynx fan | ProgGlob DINO Democrat (DFL), Liberal, LGBTQ , health care advocate, Pro DEI, Pro Gender Fluidity, Pro Gender Wars, Pro Administrative State (Rebrand.ly/ProgsLaugh), Pro MN as a immigration sanctuary State, Pro Cancel Culture, Pro Lawfare, Anti 1A, Pro-Violent Political Protests, Pro paid "crisis actors" not disclosing they are just reading & performing from a script, Against Election Integrity, Didn't stop MN Welfare Fraud, Supports Defund the Police, Supports DEI, Wokeness, & Child Gender Mutilation, Supports changing Education from focus on 3Rs to Progressive Globalist Indoctrination Centers | Failure to exercise duty of Congressive to oversee and discipline Federal Judges Per (Article I, Section 3), makes oversight and disciplining (impeachment and removal) of federal judges a constitutional duty of Congress.(Article II, Section 4) of the U.S. Constitution (the Impeachment Clause), together with Article I provisions giving the House “the sole Power of Impeachment” (Article I, Section 2) and the Senate the “sole Power to try all Impeachments”. Angie Craig appears to be a treasonous, traitors coconspirator in the nontraditional Progressive Globalist Insurgency/Coup/revolution using gradualism (Rebrand.ly/FabianGradualism), as well as Progressive & Marxist Destructionism as vectors of attack (Youtu.be/oEhJmntt4Gk <> Marxist Destructionism Youtu.be/QPmTScZ7_sk). She also supports treasonous & seditious "living US Constitution" concept as a means to alter the constitution without going through the Amendment Process defined therein, and is Pro Jurisprudence change from Rule of Law & matters before the Court being decided "On The Merits" (Rebrand.ly/OnTheMerits) to Rule of Man (Experts), preference for decisions on Technicality, Might Makes Right, Who did you vote for? Who do you know, How much justice can you afford & Are you an enemy or supporter of the Progressive Globalist Insurgency/coup/Revolution (Rebrand.ly/ProgressiveAgenda <> Rebrand.ly/SocialDarwinsim) | Supports Incentives for Family Courts to Force Child Support payment to go through the courts, rather than, by agreement of parties, to payment directly between each other. Supports No-Fault Divorce, Supports Progressive Globalist Depopulation Targets | Agrees with Progressive Democrat President Woodrow Wilson's assertion that the concept of UNALIENABLE NATURAL RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL CITIZEN is 'ridiculous'. | OPPOSES Unalienable Natural Right of the Individual Citizen to ESTABLISH TRUTH for themselves, as opposed to the Progressive Globalist Assertion that the masses are too stupid to govern themselves. Ergo, That only Progressive Globalist Educated Elites (aka Experts, Technocrats) are qualified to ESTABLISH TRUTH for the masses [eg Science Fraud, COVID19, Vaccines, Masks, Law Enforcement enforcing bogus quarantine against Education & Small Business but not large businesses like Walmart, Target, etc.] | angiecraig.com) (15!) @AnnoyedinMN (4K, StrandedInMinnesota, Minnesota, USA; Minnesota born & raised but envious of those living in a red state. I miss Trump & his mean tweets) MN PEOPLE'S PARTY (Lindell) 16MAY2026 HASHTAG X/TWITTER LIMIT 30 #MN #Governor #Candidate #Rally #MikeLindell #Lindell ^America #Politics #WETHEPEOPLE #ScienceFraud ^Border #Immigration #Conservative #Centrist #Liberal #Boomers #GenX #Millennials #GenZ #GenA #Education #Highschool #HomeSchool ^Teen ^FFA ^4H #Votech #CTE ^TradeSchool #College ^Agriculture #Farm #Religion #SocialPrograms #Welfare #Fraud #Election2026 ^ElectionIntegrity
1,292
5/8 🚨 The publicly available FULL EVIDENCE PACKAGE — detailing how Elisabeth Bik and the PubPeer "PubSmear" Network Mob have weaponized "research integrity" to 100% censor critiques of their own flawed work while relentlessly targeting others. 📌 Available on the freely accessible ScienceGuardians™ Substack; no subscription or fee required: 🔗 scienceguardians.substack.co… #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics
4
8
27
1,017
« 🚨 BREAKING : Elisabeth Bik, la fausse « consultante en intégrité scientifique » qui a été soigneusement positionnée comme le visage public du réseau « PubSmear » de PubPeer, ment effrontément : « J’ai abordé ces préoccupations il y a des années. L’IRB couvrait les cinq sites corporels et était renouvelé annuellement. [lien vers l’enregistrement de l’article sur PubPeer] » ⚠️ Cela concerne deux articles PLOS ONE liés à uBiome co-écrits par Elisabeth M. Bik (@PLOSONE @PLOS) — des articles dont les auteurs principaux (co-fondateurs d’uBiome Jessica Richman et Zachary Apte) ont été inculpés au niveau fédéral pour fraude et restent des fugitifs criminels — qui citent tous deux la même approbation pour sujets humains — IRB Study #13044 (05/10/2013) — malgré des activités de recherche très différentes, y compris un article diagnostique vaginal ultérieur impliquant des tests HPV et IST qui était promu comme un test commercial. Les déclarations et justifications de Bik sur la plateforme PubPeer compromise (alias PubSmear) ne résolvent pas le problème central. Personne n’a contesté qu’un seul formulaire de consentement ait pu mentionner : • bouche • nez • peau • intestin • organes génitaux La véritable préoccupation est bien plus grave : 📌 Une approbation IRB de 2013 a-t-elle légitimement couvert une étude diagnostique vaginale commerciale ultérieure impliquant : • génotypage HPV • détection IST • données de santé reproductive • interprétation clinique • commercialisation d’un test mis sur le marché Ce ne sont pas simplement des sites corporels différents. Ils impliquent des aspects matériellement différents : • profils de risque • sensibilité à la vie privée • objectifs de l’étude • obligations réglementaires Selon les normes normales des IRB, cela nécessite typiquement : ✅ amendements au protocole ✅ enregistrements de réexamen continu ✅ documentation d’approbation mise à jour Pourtant, dans les deux articles, les auteurs citent la même approbation exacte : IRB Study #13044 (05/10/2013) Et surtout, Bik elle-même admet : « Je n’ai pas accès à des documents officiels d’approbation éthique IRB. » Donc ce qui a été fourni n’était que : ❌ un formulaire de consentement général des participants et non ❌ le protocole IRB réel ❌ avis de renouvellement ❌ approbations d’amendements ❌ documentation de portée ⚠️ Un formulaire de consentement n’est pas une preuve d’approbation réglementaire. Si le protocole a été véritablement renouvelé annuellement, la question évidente demeure : ❓ Pourquoi les deux articles citent-ils encore uniquement la date d’approbation originale de 2013 sans historique d’amendements divulgué nulle part dans l’enregistrement de publication ? Sa réponse aborde le problème des sites corporels. Elle ne résout pas le problème de la portée du protocole. 🚨 La question demeure : Pourquoi PLOS ONE n’a-t-il toujours pas rétracté ces deux articles frauduleux d’uBiome co-écrits par Elisabeth M. Bik, malgré des violations claires de la portée IRB, des conflits d’intérêts massifs non divulgués avec une entreprise inculpée au niveau fédéral, des allégations cliniques invalides, des échecs d’intégrité des données, et la perte permanente des données brutes ? ⚠️ Ces institutions et individus font partie de ceux qui ont amplifié et mis en avant Bik, certains de manière systématique, malgré ses propres fraudes documentées et son hypocrisie flagrante, d’autres de façon imprudente et apparemment inconscients de sa mauvaise conduite. Considérez cela comme un avertissement courtois à la lumière de la demande croissante de la communauté académique pour la responsabilité et la transparence » @Nature @ScienceMagazine @NewsfromScience @senseaboutsci @SenseScienceUSA @Einstein_Berlin @ChemistryWorld @unibern @NaturePlants @Andy_Tattersall @ERoseEngland @cremieuxrecueil @WCRIFoundation @MarionKoopmans #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #ResearchIntegrity #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy ScienceGuardians™ 🔱
🚨 Why has PLOS ONE still not retracted these two fraudulent uBiome papers co-authored by Elisabeth M. Bik — despite: • clear IRB scope violations • undisclosed massive conflicts of interest with a federally indicted company • invalid clinical claims • data integrity failures • and the permanent loss of raw data? @PLOS @PLOSONE @C0PE — Selective enforcement undermines trust in the entire publishing system. #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal ScienceGuardians™ 🔱
3
49
75
4,300
2/2) ⚠️ Diese Institutionen und Personen gehören zu denen, die Bik eine Plattform geboten und ihr zu mehr Bekanntheit verholfen haben – einige systematisch trotz ihres eigenen dokumentierten Betrugs und ihrer eklatanten Heuchelei, andere rücksichtslos und offenbar ohne Kenntnis ihres Fehlverhaltens. Betrachten Sie dies als eine freundliche Warnung angesichts der zunehmenden Forderung der akademischen Gemeinschaft nach Rechenschaftspflicht und Transparenz: @Nature @ScienceMagazine @NewsfromScience @senseaboutsci @SenseScienceUSA @Einstein_Berlin @ChemistryWorld @unibern @NaturePlants @Andy_Tattersall @ERoseEngland @cremieuxrecueil @WCRIFoundation @MarionKoopmans #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #ResearchIntegrity #PLOSONE #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy ScienceGuardians™ 🔱
1
6
305
2/2) ⚠️ Ces institutions et ces personnes font partie de celles qui ont amplifié et mis en avant Bik — certaines de manière systématique malgré sa propre fraude documentée et son hypocrisie flagrante, d'autres de manière imprudente et apparemment sans se rendre compte de sa faute professionnelle. Considérez ceci comme un avertissement de courtoisie à la lumière de la demande croissante de la communauté universitaire en matière de responsabilité et de transparence : @Nature @ScienceMagazine @NewsfromScience @senseaboutsci @SenseScienceUSA @Einstein_Berlin @ChemistryWorld @unibern @NaturePlants @Andy_Tattersall @ERoseEngland @cremieuxrecueil @WCRIFoundation @MarionKoopmans #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #ResearchIntegrity #PLOSONE #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy ScienceGuardians™ 🔱
1
4
319
🚨 Breaking: Elisabeth Bik, the fake 'science integrity consultant' who has been carefully positioned as the public face of the PubPeer 'PubSmear' Network, blatantly lies: “I addressed these concerns years ago — here is a helpful link. The IRB covered all five body sites and was yearly renewed. [link to the article record on PubPeer]” ⚠️ This concerns two uBiome-linked PLOS ONE papers co-authored by Elisabeth M. Bik (@PLOSONE @PLOS) — papers whose lead authors (uBiome co-founders Jessica Richman and Zachary Apte) were federally indicted on fraud charges and remain criminal fugitives — that both cite the exact same human-subjects approval — IRB Study #13044 (05/10/2013) — despite involving very different research activities, including a later vaginal diagnostic paper involving HPV and STI testing that was promoted as a commercial assay. Bik’s statements and justifications on the compromised PubPeer (aka PubSmear) platform do not resolve the core issue. No one disputed that a single consent form may have referenced: • mouth • nose • skin • gut • genitals The actual concern is far more serious: 📌 Did a 2013 IRB approval legitimately cover a later commercial vaginal diagnostic study involving: • HPV genotyping • STI detection • reproductive health data • clinical interpretation • commercialization of a marketed assay Those are not merely different body sites. They involve materially different: • risk profiles • privacy sensitivity • study objectives • regulatory obligations Under normal IRB standards, that typically requires: ✅ protocol amendments ✅ continuing review records ✅ updated approval documentation Yet in both papers the authors cite the exact same approval: IRB Study #13044 (05/10/2013) And importantly, Bik herself admits: “I do not have access to any official IRB ethical approval documents.” So what was provided was only: ❌ a general participant consent form —not— ❌ the actual IRB protocol ❌ renewal notices ❌ amendment approvals ❌ scope documentation ⚠️ A consent form is not proof of regulatory approval. If the protocol was truly renewed yearly, the obvious question remains: ❓ Why do both papers still cite only the original 2013 approval date with no amendment history disclosed anywhere in the publication record? Her reply addresses the body-site issue. It does not resolve the protocol-scope issue. 🚨 The question remains: Why has PLOS ONE still not retracted these two fraudulent uBiome papers co-authored by Elisabeth M. Bik, despite clear IRB scope violations, undisclosed massive conflicts of interest with a federally indicted company, invalid clinical claims, data integrity failures, and the permanent loss of raw data? ⚠️ These institutions and individuals are among those which have amplified and platformed Bik — some systematically despite her own documented fraud and glaring hypocrisy, others recklessly and apparently unaware of her misconduct. Consider this a courtesy warning in light of the increasing demand by the academic community for accountability and transparency: @Nature @ScienceMagazine @NewsfromScience @senseaboutsci @SenseScienceUSA @Einstein_Berlin @ChemistryWorld @unibern @NaturePlants @Andy_Tattersall @ERoseEngland @cremieuxrecueil @WCRIFoundation @MarionKoopmans #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #ResearchIntegrity #PLOSONE #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy ScienceGuardians™ 🔱
🚨 Why has PLOS ONE still not retracted these two fraudulent uBiome papers co-authored by Elisabeth M. Bik — despite: • clear IRB scope violations • undisclosed massive conflicts of interest with a federally indicted company • invalid clinical claims • data integrity failures • and the permanent loss of raw data? @PLOS @PLOSONE @C0PE — Selective enforcement undermines trust in the entire publishing system. #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal ScienceGuardians™ 🔱
6
64
137
22,615
🚨 速報:有償の工作員が医療・健康科学に介入――人々に課せられた多大な犠牲(そして、なぜ「誠実さ」の自称守護者たちが問題の一部となっているのか) 何十年もの間、有力企業は、公衆衛生に関連する製品の科学的データに影響を与えるために、有償の工作員を利用してきた。 ⚠️ こうした隠された利益相反が数年後に明るみに出ると、学術誌は論文を取り下げますが、その時にはすでに手遅れです。警告が遅れ、曝露は続き、何千ものがんが予防できたはずだったのです。 まずは、この仕組みを如実に示す2つの最近の撤回事例から見ていきましょう。 🧵 ディスカッションはここから始まります。 最後までお付き合いください――報酬を受け取るエージェント、人的な犠牲、そして不正な「誠実性」システムが完全に暴かれます。 🧵🇯🇵 threadreaderapp-com.translat… #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics @Mami_Aho_Dema @seseragiryu @fgidf98fj9jh0h
1/7 🚨 BREAKING: Paid Agents Meddling in Health & Medical Sciences – The Grave Human Cost (and Why the Self-Appointed “Integrity” Watchdogs Are Part of the Problem) For decades, powerful companies have used paid agents to shape the scientific record on products tied to public health. ⚠️ When those hidden conflicts surface years later, journals retract the papers — but the damage is already done: delayed warnings, continued exposure, and thousands of preventable cancers. We start with two recent retractions that expose exactly how this works. 🧵 Thread starts now. Stay till the end — the paid agents, the human cost, and the rigged “integrity” system will be fully exposed. #ElisabethBik #PubPeerScandal #PubSmear #Breaking #News #ScienceFraud #ScienceHypocrisy #ImageForensics
13
17
1,187